erynthered

Obama ran and is running on a theme. "Change" Thats their point. Do I need to explain further?

Just an FYI. That info is in the link provided by the starter of the thread.

Maybe BLZFAN4LIFE has a patent pending for that particular maneuver.

You should be. 4 of your liberal friends on the SCOTUS nearly trampled the Constitution.

Thanks alot!

There was this idiot in my old neighborhood who use to walk his two large labs around the block every morning. The dogs had decorated my lawn a few times before so I asked nicely if he would clean up their mess, he refused. At the time I had three dogs myself. The next time his dogs did "their business" on my front lawn. I picked up the mess, then waited till nightfall. Around midnight I deposited His dogs "business" in his mail box as I drove by it. I think what pissed me off the most was when I was playing with my then two year old daughter on the front lawn, she stepped in his dogs " Business" Never a problem again. Mail call!!

Thats the size of Ronnie Lotts lot!

Since you only have the pup till Tuesday, get these and dont worry about it anymore. http://www.petdiapers.com/diaper/cdiaper/

Maybe not. But it sure might give them some closure.

I responded to your sarcasm at about the same time you responded to Jarhead. I hadn't seen the other post. Thats why I chided you.

No. This was a dumb thing to say.

He obviously has no respect of the Constitution. This is a Historic Day.

Time for another Paver?

Found it: http://www.supremecourtus.gov/opinions/07pdf/07-290.pdf

If someone finds the ruling, could you post it please. I'm having difficulty finding it. I'd like to read it. Another article on the ruling: http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/suprem...2008-06-26.html

http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5jZOi0Qx...z-wL-wD91HQBVO2

THE GASH STATION

Then he has a soccer game to play in with his mates.

Nice.

Maybe he knows because he may be one of those people.

There is audio of it. I heard that guy yesterday. Sickening.

God. Why did I open that link! I HATE that kind of music.

I didnt read the ruling, sorry. My take is that the SC thought that the Rapist would start to take out the only witnesses to their crime. I mean more often, as I know they do that too. And I agree with you chknwing334, if someone raped one of my daghters I'd have a hard time staying away from the accused if you know what I mean.

Saving for retirement? Saving for Collage for my kids? Saving for a nice Vacation? Saving for that repair thats needed on my home? Thats so passe. Even Frivolous!!

A little loopy today? Dude, you're way, way off base with that statement.