At the end of the day all they had to do was stop them with 1:50, but they couldn’t.
Offence was bad but scored when it mattered most.
Defence was bad throughout and couldn’t stop them when it mattered most
Ya. Not saying his opinion is the holy gospel, but it’s a better guess than 99 percent of us including you and me. (Unless you have a doctor of physiotherapy degree)
There’s no doubt the O sucks.
But I’m sorry, When you have a lead with 1:50 against the worst offence in the league, you have to stop them.
NES offence has played many of defences when key players were injured, it’s not like the bills are the only injured team in the NFL
? The bills had the LEAD with 1:50 left and NE HAD to pass. The bills literally made them one dimensional and they couldn’t stop them.
So respectfully, what you are saying doesn’t add up at all
Last time I checked we still have Von, Floyd, Rousseau, Poyer, Hyde.l, Epenasa, Phillips.
How much money for those players to contain the worst offence in the nfl?
I get “this”.
NE also had what, 4 starters out on defence?
Lets stop making injuries as an excuse to the fact you can’t slow down the worst offence in the NFL.
ONE punt all game
That game definitely cost them division, maybe playoffs.
Mcd has officially shown he can’t overcome the injuries on defence , and this offence is still as Jekyll/Hyde as you get