Jump to content

Yard Monkey

Community Member
  • Posts

    329
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Yard Monkey

  1.  

    I think it was at the this stage of camp, I am not 100% sure but I think it was at this stage of camp but I could be wrong. Looking into the stat now.

     

    EDIT: It was at the end of camp. Camp is almost over as another poster pointed out.

    Looks like 31 before the start of the 2013 season so 2 weeks still to go for this season. (yes, technically the next 2 weeks are no longer considered "camp" - so what are the next 2 weeks called? :unsure: )

     

    http://www.sbnation.com/nfl/2015/8/26/9210063/nfl-preseason-shortened-acl-knee-injuries-orlando-scandrick-jordy-nelson

  2.  

    Justify that please, because I can far more reasonably say that we'd have 3 fewer wins with Mack than Sammy. Sammy made crucial plays against Miami, Minnesota, and Detroit that delivered wins. Please show me how substituting Mack would've meant (a) also winning those games, and (b) winning two others among:

     

    SD

    Houston

    NE

    KC

    Miami

    Denver

    Ok:

     

    SD: Mack would have strip sacked Rivers for a turnover in field goal range and defended several passes to Gates preventing an SD TD (Bills win)

     

    Houston: Mack would have broken Fitzgerald's leg early in the game "crippling" the Houston offense (Bills win)

     

    NE: Mack would have shut down Gronk making the NE offense impotent (Bills win)

     

    There are 3 more wins for you. Need I go on? How could you possibly ask for a hypothetical response against actual facts...seriously??

     

    That is one of the more pompous responses I have seen here in a while. Oh, and this is coming from someone that is ok with the Watkins trade.

  3. It's not addressing the issues and combating the criticisms when your examples support the opposition. :lol: The complainers are saying he should have passed more and should have done more of exactly the things that Jwhite was showing worked, which if they would have, would have won the game earlier and easier.

    Rarely post and read this site daily. I think your posts are normally on point (well I agree with the,m at least), but you have recently been unfairly all over the OC in my opinion. There was no need to push anything in this game. They picked their spots to push...and apparently chose well...and picked their spots to run clock and keep the Jets honest (by running up the middle)

     

    Don't forget, the Jets front 7 and Rex Ryan pressure packages are very dangerous and could easily have changed the direction of the game with a sack-turnover. With an inconsistent Oline, young/new players at the skill positions (other than Chandler), this was a sound game plan and the OC and play caller (Marrone?) deserve credit in this case.

  4. I think we all know that if EJ was the quarterback tonight, he would have lost worse than Geno. I mean, yeah , the Bills beat these same Bears, and yeah the Bills beat them in Chicago, but tonight was Geno's night.

     

    Except that he lost. And opened the game with a pick six. But at least he's not EJ. :huh:

    ....and he lost at home...but he was exciting! I'm sure Jest fans are excited

×
×
  • Create New...