Jump to content

TakeYouToTasker

Community Member
  • Posts

    19,668
  • Joined

Everything posted by TakeYouToTasker

  1. So, now that the picture is clear, let’s make it abundantly clear how unfathomably ***** and racist the OP was acting when he made this thread, when he accused Kyle Riitenhouse of being a “white supremacist domestic terrorist”. - Rittenhouse worked for the business he was defending. - Rittenhouse lived 30 minutes away. - Rittenhouse observed absurd levels of trigger discipline. - Rittenhouse was rushed by Gaige Grosskruetz, 26. A member of The People’s Revolution Movement, a Communist organization, and a convicted felon for whom it is a felony to possess a gun. Grosskruetz was chasing Rittenhouse, with the stated intention of “unloading the entire magazine into (Rittenhouse)”. - Rittenhouse fired a single shot into the arm of Grosskruetz. - Rittenhouse was attacked by Joseph Rosenbaum, 36. Rosenbaum, a convicted pedophile, registered as a sex offender in two states, attacked Rittenhouse, knocking him to the ground and tried to disarm him before he was fatally shot for his efforts. Rittenhouse fired two shots at Rosenbaum. - Rittenhouse was attacked by Anthony Huber, 26. Huber, a convicted wife beater, attacked Rittenhouse with a skateboard while he was already on the ground. He is on video hitting him in the head and face with a weapon. Rittenhouse fired a single shot into Huber, killing him, ending the assault. - Rittenhouse showed incredible restraint from a defensive firearms training perspective. He was justified in shooting each aggressor far earlier than he did. - Rittenhouse, in a crowded area, under riot conditions, fired only four shots, eliminating all three threats with no collateral damage. As far as the OP goes, Rittenhouse was in the wrong. The pedophile, the wife beater, and the convicted felon, all Communist revolutionaries, all assaulting him, atleast one with the expressed intent to murder him, are downtrodden heroes. Oh, that and Rittenhouse, according to him, is a white supremacist. Without evidence. Carry on.
  2. They’ve been trying for years. The Giants actually even rescinded his invitation to participate in the World Series reunion. He doesn’t care, and refuses to be cancelled.
  3. Update: the second individual killed was Anthony Huber, 26. He was recorded hitting the shooter in the head and face with a skateboard. In addition to being a Communist scumbag, Huber also enjoys a lengthy criminal record including battery, and multiple instances of domestic abuse. So he’s a woman beater. So, again leftists, who wants to go first to defend this Communist wife beater with a documented violent history of assault?
  4. Update: the first individual who was killed was 36 year old Joseph Rosenbaum. In addition to being a Communist piece of *****, Rosenbaum was also a registered sex offender, convicted of a sex crime involving a minor. IE a pedophile. Is it really any wonder that the overlap of deviants and criminals with Communists trying to tear down the social order and impose their own is so strong? So, which of you leftists wants want to get in line to defend the pedophile Communist assailant?
  5. I disagree. Strong people stand up to Communist revolutionaries. He’s not a moron, at all. He’s a principled person who stood up for traditional American values against a mob hell bent on destroying them. They deserved to die, and he helped them on their way.
  6. It’s all on video. Including him being tased to no effect. Perhaps, if you’d take the time to inform yourself instead of making “skeptical” faces, you’d know this.
  7. They tried. He fought with them. This was after they arrived knowing he was a violent felon, who had prior beaten and taken a woman captive, wanted on three separate warrants, one of which was a felony warrant. He fought them off, brandished a knife, and then reached into a car to retrieve something during the fight. That’s when he got shot. Tell me what sorcery they should have used.
  8. Don’t confuse intent with willingness. It’s both moral and just to shoot Communist revolutionaries, especially when they assault you. Oh, I think you’ll find that the overwhelming majority of Americans think it’s perfectly reasonable to shoot Communist revolutionaries who are burning down US cities, especially after they assault you while you are defending the business you work for. That’s about as traditionally American as it gets. And of course people like that support the President. Their alternative is supporting the clowns who support the Communists.
  9. Hardly. Explain how your argument doesn’t hinge on the notion that people who oppose a Communist revolution are obligated to simply sit there and take it. Also important to note that the “out of state” nonsense is an absolute canard. He lived 30 minutes away, and stated in an interview that he worked at the business he was defending.
  10. He was there to prevent trouble by presenting himself to prevent private property from being destroyed by Communists. Your entire argument is dependent on the idea that people who oppose Communist revolutions should just sit back and take it. News Flash: the ones out looking for trouble are the Communists. If the Communists weren’t having a revolution, no one would be out with guns shooting Communists. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes; ***** around, and find out.
  11. Private property. Not his, but someone’s. Are you really making the argument that only the property owner has the right to defend their own property, and that anyone else is simply obligated to be a bystander? And so what if he did want to use his gun? He didn’t assault anyone. He responded when being assaulted. I think Communists should be stacked in mass graves. I’d be thrilled to shoot a Communist who attacked me, my loved ones, or my property while in the act. Enjoyment doesn’t somehow make defense Into murder.
  12. To defend private property from violent Communist mobs. Which is a moral and just thing to do. What is it with you folks who think people who oppose what’s been happening are supposed to just sit back and take it? Do you not realize that was a stupid assumption? That the majority of the country, especially once you get away from the coasts, don’t relish being victims, and will instead refuse to be victimized, incorporating lethal force as necessary? The left has been pushing for this for months, and now it will reap what it has sowed. This won’t be an isolated incident.
  13. Excellent post. You beat me to it. The OP is just a racist hack with an axe to grind, and a Communist to boot. His grievance is that “white people”, not people in general, but “white people”, are defending property from Communist thugs. And he has a problem with this, because “white people shouldn’t be powerful enough” to defend themselves from useless flesh sacks like himself.
  14. Nope. Not how this works. Individuals are free to defend private property, their own or someone else’s. While he was defending the property he was rushed by an individual with a gun, and shot him in the arm. He was then assaulted by two other individuals, shown here kicking him to the ground, and hitting him in the head with a skateboard. Those two she shot, and killed, while on his back, being assaulted. He was aggressed by all three. That only two of them died is the only shame here. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
  15. You, as always, are a liar. First the “Boogaloo“ is a libertarian term for Civil War II, where libertarians attack the stare when it violates their rights. It is not in any way associated with white supremacy. It was labeled a white supremacist concept by leftists who label everything against them racist. Second, the individual in question was defending private property, a gas station, when he was attacked. The first person he shot, described as “a medic with a cell phone” can be seen here: I wonder what caliber “cell phone” that is? He was seen charging the man who shot him, brandishing his gun. As for the two men who died? They rushed him, kicking him to the ground, trying to disarm him, and hitting him on the head with a skateboard before he shot them.
  16. Happening now. You wanted your Civil War? You got your Civil War.
  17. According to some sources large groups carrying “long rifles” are slowly converging on Kenosha.
  18. Blacks are not getting shot more often than whites in similar instances.
  19. So, stack them in piles. Just don’t empower a fascist government to do it, because those guys also need to be stacked in piles. It’s not binary.
  20. No, I don’t. You believe it’s the proper action of the state to imprison political opposition. I do not, because I do not believe the state has just authority. I think it’s good and proper to dig mass graves for Marxists, as they state that their goals are to violate your rights. Much in the same way it’s perfectly moral to shoot someone for brandishing a weapon at you unprovoked by aggression or threat of violence.
  21. This after the left refusing to concede in 2016, the staging a coup, and the launching of The Resistance. I’m ready to start seeing these #######s thrown out of helicopters. Leftists always lie and their lies are always projections. You cannot co-exist with these types. I won’t mourn them when the shooting starts; as they have more value stacked in piles in large holes than they do standing and breathing.
  22. The NFL couldn’t begin to pay his salary. He earns approximately $34.1m/yr in salary alone, plus he’s one of the few teams sports athletes in the world who owns the complete rights to his own image, which any team he signs for will have to negotiate to use. It is speculated that his entire compensation is between $80-$100m/yr.
×
×
  • Create New...