FireChan

Someone's a witttle upset. Is your avatar Tim Graham because you strive to be as thin-skinned and moronic as him?

Nope, wasn't a designed drop in coverage, sorry. http://www.nfl.com/videos/nfl-game-highlights/0ap3000000391270/Q4-Kyle-Williams-grabs-interception Kyle rushes the passer immediately off the snap. Only breaks off of his blockers once Cutler has rolled out to the opposite of the field, then Kyle takes a wide pursuit angle through the middle of the field because he can't get to him in time. Any other times you think it happened?

Show me a designed play where Kyle drops back in coverage in 2014.

This never happened.

He quit because of disagreements in philosophy. He was hired as DC under Fisher.

You need to relax, pal. Why did you cut out 3/4's of your nonsense when you reposted it? Did you recognize it for its stupdiity? That's what you wrote. And you call me childish? This is a tantrum, through and through. According those other idiots' stupid logic, I'm right. As I said above, it's embarrassing. And yes, you put both brown and killing gays in your "definition" (your words) of a terrorist. This is why I told you you gave me an example, not a definition. You protested, not me. Being brown and killing gays is how you define a terrorist. Sorry you put yourself in such a bind. I think I could agree with that, yeah. He's just a wacko

Great points. Stick the the pot and NBA threads homie.

Has a coordinator ever quit because they weren't promoted? Serious question.

Over my head? You know who will never have the freedom to buy assault weapons? 50 people in Orlando. Because they're dead. Find my deeper meaning, hombre. Oh the irony of needing me to spell out why the Orlando shooting doesn't fit the criteria I posted after insulting my intelligence. Here's a hint, "conducted either by an organization with an identifiable chain of command or conspiratorial cell structure (whose members wear no uniform or identifying insignia) or by a small collection of individuals directed by some existent terrorist movement and/or its leaders; and perpetrated by a subnational group or nonstate entity." Where was the direction? Where was the identifiable chain of command? Group of individuals directed by a movement? Perpetrated by a sub-national or non-state entity? Oh. I bet 9/11 didn't have that either though! Oh.

Huh? I'm lacking direct discussion? Where's the refutation of my definition that you promised? It's simple. You keep shouting "50 dead" because it's supposed to make us sad and act irrationally. No thanks. You are no different than the ones who shout "50 dead" to try to take away guns.

Sure it is. When was our last "terrorist" attack or mass shooting on US soil? 50 dead is a drop in the bucket in terms of # dead, not to mention it's an attack that is nigh impossible to prevent. Thinking about it any other way is clouding your mind. Yet, we need to make sure this guy is called a terrorist because.....why? Are we going to stop bombing the ME because that's why he said he did it? Are we going to fight ISIS harder, because he pledged allegiance to them, even though they had nothing to do with the attack? No, and no. Why die on the "this guy is definitely a terrorist" hill?

Nice one dude. Appeal to emotion. Helps keep a clear mind, I know. Here's my definition of terrorism, modified from Bruce Hoffman's. "Terrorism is: ineluctably political in aims and motives; violent—or, equally important, threatens violence; designed to have far-reaching psychological repercussions beyond the immediate victim or target; conducted either by an organization with an identifiable chain of command or conspiratorial cell structure (whose members wear no uniform or identifying insignia) or by a small collection of individuals directed by some existent terrorist movement and/or its leaders; and perpetrated by a subnational group or nonstate entity." Go ahead. I consider 9/11 a terrorist attack. Enjoy chasing your tail.

FTFY. I'm sure she'll be a Bernie-lite now after she's gotten their votes.

It's not surprising. Use words you mean and be precise. Painting with broad strokes is never a good move, no matter how much fear-mongering you try to spread. If you're going to post pages and pages about how some folks don't represent your group of people just because they say they do, I'm going to challenge you when you say it's clear he's a terrorist because he said so. Sorry, i know some folks hate being kept honest.

Huh? Bernie's been portraying himself as the overlooked underdog his whole campaign. He was the one playing off of "the government thinks I don't have a shot." Yeah, a man of principles like Bernie would support you voting for someone you find morally reprehensible because they are the only one "with a chance to win." That's how idealistc, conscientious and moral men behave. Sure thing birddog. That's why he's packed up the whole campaign right?

The powers that be or the "Left" believe retarded things, so me believing retarded things is okay. Why? Well because the "Left" does it! This is honestly an embarrassing post. I wouldn't cite it ever again. Go sit in the corner and think about what you've done.

You haven't given a definition, but an example. The condescending thing doesn't work when I'm wiping the floor with you.

Perhaps? You, without a shred of self-awareness, just said its no use voting with your conscience, morals or ideals if that candidate can't win. You, an admitted Bernie supporter because of his conscience, morals and ideals. In short, you're a !@#$ing moron. Bernie would think you're the problem with America. Think about that.

We know.

If they're brown and kill gays, they're terrorists? I don't think that even necessitates a response. Glad to see your hypocrisy exposed again, though. Donald Trump isn't a TRUE Republican. WBC aren't TRUE Christians. But that gay Islamic guy? Totally a TRUE Muslim, folks.

You said "so many other players." That's 2.

That's 2 players over 10 years, John.

Huh?

Oh no, you're the one throwing it around. You define it. Matter of fact, define Republican, Christian and Muslim while you're at it. Let's see how consistent you can be.

What? This is horrible, cynical take out of you.