Rocky Landing
-
Posts
7,450 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Rocky Landing
-
-
His failure to show up in the big moment in the AFCCG might be his death knell. It doesn't really matter if he has great hands, if his head gets in the way. Beyond that, his YAC are not great, either.
-
1 hour ago, YoloinOhio said:
He’s a minimalist so this checks out
I love that part of his story. I remember reading an article on him years back that revealed he barely had any furniture in his apartment, and kept his clothes on a rack that consisted of multiple sets of the same outfit, which IIRC, were gray jeans, and black shirts.
And about a year after that, I recall a color commentator during a game making some comment about him "playing for a contract..." and I yelled at the screen, "you have no idea what you're talking about!" As a player, I don't believe he even keeps track of the score during a game. He plays every play in the moment, whether it's five minutes into the game, or five minutes from its resolution.
-
1 hour ago, Royale with Cheese said:
Milano is my favorite Bill outside of Josh Allen.
I hope he can stay healthy all year, especially if this is his final year.
He's right up there with Fred-X and Kyle Williams.
-
3
-
-
17 minutes ago, Einstein said:
Guess I have to hold your hand and walk you through this.
The study *you* linked looked at players already cut or players who were up for a second contract. It was looking at players who didn’t receive a second contract. In other words, you can’t count players a GM drafts last year, because the “hit” rate would be 100%. No-one let’s go of a player one year after drafting them.
The 40% number listed was all non-Allen draft picks. Not “hit” percentage. By your studies metric, Beane’s non-Allen hit” rate is 33%. Which, let me do some quick calculating here, would mean that Beane is below average.
math
Math, indeed. Not really sure where you came up with 33%. Of the five first-round, non-Allen picks Beane has made, three of them are still on the team. Two (Groot and Oliver) have signed contract extensions. Two (Edmunds, and Elam) are gone. Kincaid wouldn't really work into that study. He's not a player who "didn't re-up with their drafting team," as he's only been in the league two years. And of course, we didn't have a first round pick last year.
Be that as it may, your original point that Beane's first round draft record supports the notion that Beane would be fired, were it not for Allen, is nonsense. Of Beane's five first round picks not named Allen, only one of them (Elam) could really be considered a bust. Edmunds left the Bills, and signed a $72M contract with the Bears.
Although, I suppose if Beane hadn't drafted Allen, and instead gone for "Right Josh" Rosen, he might have been shown the door not long after. But, he didn't, did he?
-
1
-
-
53 minutes ago, Einstein said:
According to your article 43% is average.
So he would be below average...You said "40% of Beane’s first round picks aren’t even on the team anymore," which (let me do some quick calculating here...) would mean that 60% are on the team. The article says that 43% is average. But, if you look at the article, the positions that they have targeted in the first round would have an even lower average than that.
Math
-
7 hours ago, Einstein said:
I don’t know how anyone could disagree with this.Without Allen, 40% of Beane’s first round picks aren’t even on the team anymore.
Which isn't as bad as one might think.
-
Beane may not be an "elite GM" (whatever that means...), and McDermott may not be an elite HC (although, I see improvement every season), but I will say this: The two make an excellent team. That's not something every team in the NFL can boast. From the moment they arrived at OBD, they have consistently been on the same page, and that has paid dividends. (Who here remembers the contentious relationships between Nix/Whaley, and the revolving door of head coaches from the drought era?) Just taking last season as an example, The Bills' defense outperformed expectations with a roster built on-the-cheap with personnel that fit into a shared vision. You can't overstate the value in that.
-
A fan favorite. He'll be sorely missed.
-
1
-
-
I was a huge fan of Hollins, and I was happy when he was signed. I hate to see him go. In the end, he was exactly what I thought he would be in terms of his role, but he far exceeded expectations. A real clutch player, effective end zone guy, and down-field blocker.
That being said, while he did exceed expectations, his use as a blocker may have proved redundant, and his main flaw-- his ability to gain separation-- was certainly real. We have a strong enough TE room that we don't need a WR to be played like one.
Still... sad he won't be a Bill.
-
1
-
-
6 hours ago, Doc Brown said:
Just because he's advocating for himself on social media doesn't mean he isn't a good teammate/person etc... McDermott went out of his way to compliment Cook for the work he put in to get better. I only see downside to using social media when it comes to contract negotiations but it's not egregious enough of "engaging in behavior that I don't believe Beane or McD will tolerate." How dare he stop following the Buffalo Bills on Instagram. Hell, if he gives us Diggs like production for four years if we extend him he can send all the cryptic tweets he wants. He seems like a quiet guy though so once he gets his money he should stop all the social media nonsense.
I know it's not an apples to apples comparison to Diggs. And I'm not suggesting he's some kind of locker room cancer. Perhaps "teammate" was the wrong word for me to use. I'm sure players advocate for themselves all the time, but at OBD, it's done behind closed doors. I honestly believe that's the way Beane/McD prefer it. But Cook, regardless of how flexible it may be, seems to have publicly drawn a line in the sand. One would expect that isn't out of the blue, but comes on the heels of conversations they've already had. And if Cook's "$15M" post was done without provocation, it's a bit of a blindside.
-
3 hours ago, FireChans said:
I think there’s far more pressure to extend Cook now than 2 days ago
Why?
-
Perhaps not an apples to apples comparison, but Cook's actions are reminiscent of Diggs behavior, and they were willing to eat $30M+ to let Diggs go. Beane has a history of rewarding players who show themselves to be good teammates, along with being good players. Cook is engaging in behavior that I don't believe Beane, or McD will tolerate. It's a precedent that they have not allowed to be set, and as good as Cook is, I don't believe they're going to set it now.
-
2
-
1
-
1
-
2
-
-
Man, if when I was that age, we could have been arrested for putting a family member in a choke hold, we would have had a helluva lot of legal bills...
-
1
-
-
He's not elite, but he's a solid starter, and I think he still has plenty of potential to improve. And, I don't care how much he gets paid, I only care how it affects the cap. I like this move.
-
1
-
-
There are varying measures of what people consider a "successful season." One of those scales (the one held by the OP) holds that a successful season ends in a Super Bowl win-- period. Others might consider making it to the Super Bowl some measure of success. Miami Dolphins fans are currently talking about, maybe next season, making a "deep playoff run..." as a successful season. Jets fans would just like a return to relevancy.
During the drought years, before Allen showed up, I used to joke on this site about how we would perennially win the offseason.
Personally, I don't share @Hermes perspective. I'm not sure where I fit on the scale of what I would consider a "successful season," but I will say that I consider this last season-- one in which few pundits, and media analysts had us winning the division, much less getting one score away from the SB-- to be successful. I think any season where a team far exceeds expectations should be considered successful.
This last season has made me especially optimistic for the next.
And I certainly don't think there is one successful team, and 31 failures per year. That's a glass 31/32 empty. I can't live like that. I'm definitely a "glass half full" kinda guy (even if it is half full of sh!t...)
-
4
-
1
-
1
-
3
-
-
I think it’s a good idea.
-
1
-
1
-
-
6 hours ago, JakeFrommStateFarm said:
LA may be a stretch.
But I thought So Cal was really nice about an hour outside LA. I liked the Huntington beach area.
But close enough to LA to continue to grow her career but not in the middle of the city.
I know that Josh lives in Encino I believe and she is pretty close to there.
Not Encino-- that's in the middle of the San Fernando Valley. He has a house in a gated community in Dana Point, which is South of Huntington Beach. If Josh Allen lived there year-round, he would not be playing football (unless he didn't mind driving about 3 1/2 hours every day).
-
1
-
-
8 minutes ago, FireChans said:
Do you think Hailee lives in Buffalo full time?
Of course not. Neither does Josh.
-
2
-
-
34 minutes ago, JakeFrommStateFarm said:
After marriage and children, Josh will want to live in the LA full time.
This is to support his wifes acting and music career.
Are you suggesting that Allan would only be willing to play for the Chargers, or Rams, and that he would go out of his way to engineer a deal in one of those franchises? Seems like a stretch.
He doesn't have a home in LA now. And there really isn't a reason for Hailee to live there full time, either. Motion picture production is way down in LA, but even if it were booming, it's a part time gig for someone like her, and a lot of the productions she would be involved with wouldn't shoot in LA anyway. Even animation voice work is largely done remotely these days. There's no reason to live in LA full time. Plus, the city is a sh!thole. Trust me-- I live here.
-
2
-
-
Especially now that there are three wildcard teams, and only one playoff bye per conference, getting the #1 seed is huge. It's not unreasonable to say that it was one of the largest factors that got KC into the Super Bowl.
-
1
-
-
40 is the new 30. And 50 is the new 40. And by the time Josh is 40, that 40 will be the new 30 from the previous 30, which will be the new 20. Probably by the time Josh hits Social Security age (which will have been raised to at least 70 by then) That 70 will be the new 60, at least three times removed, meaning that Josh should be a dominant NFL quarterback well into his "Golden Years," which by then will be "the new 80" which will, of course, be around 90 years old.
Math.
-
5
-
-
6 hours ago, Ralonzo said:
-
-
3 hours ago, JohnNord said:
He wasn’t a liability though and he’s played well enough to start next season. Go ahead and bookmark this comment. Cole Bishop is going to be one of the starting safeties next season.I would be happy if you're right.
Has Cook talked himself OFF the Bills for 2025
in The Stadium Wall
Posted
This raises valid questions: How much of Cook’s success can be attributed to working behind a stellar O-line? And how does that consideration affect the value McD/Beane place on the position?