yall

Did anyone go to the Toronto show last night? My buddy and I were gonna go, but the weather sealed the deal on us staying in town...

Now that makes sense. Thanks for the explanation.

I think we know what tarring and feathering is... but I still don't get this thread at all. Is it soem kind of joke or puzzle?

Maybe Lemmy's coco-puffs violate a zoning ordinance! Those of us in Buffalo feel your pain though. Sabbath/Ozzy has cancelled here a few times too.

Well it sounds like he probably got in more trouble for having the kiddie porn.

Having seen them 4 times now, I'm really glad I don't have to hear Run to the Hills and Number of the Beast for the ump-teenth time. I'm pretty sure this is the first tour since 1982 where they haven't done those two songs, and I say it's about time!

Just wanted to give this a bump to let those interested know that they are playing all of the new album during the tour. That's right, the whole album, front to back. Toronto, October 16th... see you there!

Wasn't he pissed about how some stuff he said in Columbine was taken out of context? If anything, those guys have very little loyalty to either side of our 2 sided fence.

Try substituting A1 Sauce for the Worchestershire. Old bartender trick. Some people like horseradish too...

Well the guy getting stomped didn't sign him. Does he deserve what he got? A suspention for the remainder of the year would have been best.

Actually, a few people have told me they heard Different World on the radio here in Buffalo.

I second the motion. Great album from front to back. Metal fans should run, not walk to get it. It's interesting too that in 30 years and ~60 million in album sales, this is their 1st album EVER to crack the top 10 on the US Billboard charts. For those interested they'll be close pretty soon... coming to Toronto on October 16th. Here are the other dates... there are a few more in the States aside from NY and NJ, but not many... http://www.ironmaiden.com/homepage.php?sec...=0&subsection=0

That may have more to do with runs that are stopped short of the mark. As far as JP's completion % on third down, according to TV anyway, he is currently #1. Edit: 1st in completion %, not conversion %.....

If the beer snobs among us are looking for something different, try Weihenstephan. It's made by oldest brewery in the world, dating back to 1040 AD. Great stuff.

Having been a DNC employee, I fully agree. I do not want them owning the Bills. It's amazing they are still in business. And I'm pretty sure that's only because they have enough money and connections to strong-arm people into giving them contracts.

Ever gonna answer those questions monkey-boy? I bet not....

I found myself thinking the same thing while at the game sunday. Especially when it looked like there were a couple of good opportunities to do so.

front to back? no. iv'e browsed my way through a bunch of online versoins though. didn't amount to anything more than curious research.

Good little article. It scratches the surface of the contradictions found in the koran, but doesn't go very deep. As mohhameds life changed, so did his preachings. They weren't very consistant at times. And he also wasn't exceptionaly good at practicing what he preached either. That's why I find the whole thing pretty dubious.

I don't know, I guess that's dependant upon how you define things. As I recall, jesus saw himself as a jew, but a bit of a reformist one at that (which is also up for debate, but that's for another thread). You could make the argument that he was the first christian, but it wasn't as though he refered to himself as such. But his actions and speech did define what we know as modern christianity. Which brings me back to my long standing question: Was mohammed violent?

Thanks allah you responded this way, I'm quite happy you took the bait. Since mohammed violated the koran, he too could not have been a muslim right? http://www.faithfreedom.org/oped/AbulKasem51209.htm But hey, we're getting off track. The one thing I've been asking for is for you, or anyonce else to answer this: Was mohamed violent?

You either can't or choose not to read. Which is it? A muslim can choose to ignore a passage from the koran if they so choose, and still consider themselves a muslim, can they not?

If you aren't going to contribute, why bother at all? edit: And what part of my arguements do you consider to be "flailing about"? I'd much rather you attack my arguemenrts logically, than have you insult me. But if you have nothing to contribute, why not just butt-out, instead of trolling?

Why not? As I stated islam requires reformation. I'm not advocating the elimination of islam or muslims, no matter how silly or hypocritacal of a belief syatem I think it happens to be. There are peaceful muslims, just as there are are bad christians (jeez this sounds familiar...). But the difference is the peaceful muslims are the ones who ignore the bad parts of the koran, the hadith, and the life of mohhamed. But just because there are good muslims, doesn't make islam good. Why can't you understand that?

Actually, if I'm stating isalm is bad, aren't I sort of saying being a muslim is bad? Should you be surprised? (Even though I don't hate muslims as mentioned back on page 3 or something like that, I just don't like the religion). And no, it isn't racist, no matter how badly you want it to be. Replace "islam" and "muslim" with "satanist" and "devil worshipper" and see if it's still racist. Nope, it isn't. Sorry, you lose that one.