Jump to content

HurlyBurly51

Community Member
  • Posts

    11,681
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by HurlyBurly51

  1. Every year this question is asked. Every year the games don't sell out but are shown on TV anyway. And every year this question is still asked.

     

    The game is considered a sellout because the NFL counts Rogers fee to the Bills as buying all the tickets.

     

    PTR

     

    Every year, like for the past decade or more? What an outrage someone had the audacity to ask this question again!

  2. The best part about Johnson is he is awesome dude too. Totally cool guy who is very well spoken. It's too bad the Bills aren't as good at 1st rounders as they are finding 7th rounders and UDFA

     

    With your avatar, I had to make the reference to Stevie Janowski :D

  3. Actually yes you do...if you want to know what you are talking about.

     

    PTR

     

     

    Okay, which TD was that? I don't have them all memorized. And also are you basing everything on the snapshot of the catch? What about what led to it? Was there a run fake? What formation was the D in?

     

    PTR

     

    It was the TD where they discussed whether Heap pushed off Scott or not. He basically ran about 20 yards downfield towards the post, stops, Scott just horrifically can't stop with him and stumbles around, and Heap just sits there alone, in the End zone, in between Scott and Whitner as they watch the ball come in and watch him just catch it. No fake, and I don't think the QB ever looked him off. Pathetic.

  4. The DB play is being compromised because they have to cheat up to help the front 7 on running plays. That makes them susceptible to trick plays like the flea flicker. It's a team game and players don't play in a vacuum.

     

    PTR

     

    How do you explain the Heap TD? He just easily sets up in between Whitner and Scott, and they just watch him catch an easy TD. Pretty piss poor. And that's not an isolated incident.

  5. Since his signing bonus is a sunk cost, you might as well keep him for a while. I don't think you'll save all that much by cutting him. Might as well give it a couple more years and see if he blossoms. It doesn't really hurt to keep him, other than him being a reminder of past draft failures.

     

    What business school did you go to? Sunk cost is just that - sunk. You don't make future spending decisions based on how much you've already put into a failing project. It makes no sense to continue spending good money after bad just because of a sunk cost. From a business perspective, if they see no hope for his future development, cut the cord asap.

  6. You have one example and that proves how he is going to handle every personnel decision?

     

    Wow. :wallbash: Hey, here's an idea - let's give him 10 years to see if he makes one personnel decision per year like that. Then we could have another lost decade before moving on to Ralph's next puppet. :wallbash: If you don't think we could move out of the #1 spot in the draft and get far less value than what the market would normally dictate,you just ain't been payin' attention son :wallbash:

     

    I've tried and i'm struggling. Help me out?

     

    Closest I can find is Cousineau, but he left for the CFL. Upon coming back to the NFL the Bills matched the offer he was given by Houston and thus the Bills signed him. His rights were then traded for a first rounder that was used to select Jim Kelly. Which, if this is what you were referring to, was 31 years ago. He's got a pretty good streak going.

     

    That is indeed what I was referring to. A stretch, yes, but it met the criteria for your question :devil:

  7. Since your theory is "proven", just give me 10 examples where Nix has taken less than market value to make a move.

     

    It's pretty obvious, isn't it? Lynch would be the example. And where does this proven example suddenly turn into a request for 10 such examples to validate it? :unsure:

     

    New CBA=Rookie Wage Scale, also has he ever failed to sign his 1st round draft pick?

     

    Yes he has (look it up).

  8. Were you trying to be remotely realistic at all? Because the cost for the #1 overall pick would be their first, second, and likely third or fourth. It has been said before, but trading in/out of #1 just doesn't happen and won't in 2011.

     

    Fix your sarcasm filter. And the point was Nix has proven he'll take less than market value if he wants to make a move bad enough. If he's desperate to move out of #1 overall, he'll take whatever he can get, which will likely be much less than the price you name above.

  9. After the game I found out what was going on. The girl had been being considerate and instead of making 8 people stand up when she needed to leave her seat, she would climb over into the empty row behind and go that way instead. So either some Bills employee saw her doing that, or someone reported it, and security came to tell her to stop. But not the green/yellow jacket security. The sport coat wearing supervisors, three of them. Turns out because the Jags people are in the suite, security is watching our section closely so that our fans don't give a bad impression of all Bills fans.

     

    What's the security issue with that? I wonder if they throw out the guys who run down and over 20 or 30 rows after the game is over and then cut in front of everyone waiting in line in the aisle?

  10. Bullcrap. If we are bad enough to have the number one pick, Ralph will know he needs that franchise face to sell tickets. Trade out of the top spot so we can draft a linebacker or wideout instead of a franchise QB? Please.

     

    I'm with Dr. Trooth on this one (in fact I posted this same message in another thread before his). NO WAY in hell Ralph pays out that kinda cabbage to a rookie. And it ain't $30M - isn't it closer to $50M for a #1 overall QB these days?

×
×
  • Create New...