B-Man
-
Posts
69,611 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by B-Man
-
-
WELL, THAT HARSHES THE NARRATIVE:
Income Inequality In America Is Lower Than It Was 50 Years Ago.
Related: US Household Incomes Increased More in 2018 Than in the Previous 20 Years—Combined.
Democrats have a plan to fix that, though.
-
‘Catching on yet?’
Black lawmakers call Florida’s new anti-riot bill a heartless return to the Jim Crow era
ANY attempt to rein in leftists will be this.
-
1
-
-
-
29 minutes ago, billsfan89 said:
Having Confederate statues up is the equivalent of Germany leaving up Statues of Nazi's and defending that in the name of if you let them take down the Nazi statues then they will just go after the Bismarck statues. It is a very foolish argument as each issue is isolated and mostly regional. Once again if you can't stop them anyway why not at least let them do the right thing in this instance? Just a question to you personally do you feel that the statues should be kept up?
As I have stated previously in the thread, I never saw the point of having up Confederate statues in cities, I mean for God's sake, they were the losers.
But certainly the ones that are there on old battlegrounds that honor the bravery of those Americans should stay up, but again I fear that they will not.
My basic answer is that we should legally remove those statues that the majority of Citizens think should come down. (and surely you feel that the majority of Americans feel that way, right?
Instead, over the past few years, the mob on the Left has made those decisions for us, you may disagree of course, but anyone following this issue closely would not.
Thanks.
-
4 minutes ago, BillStime said:
Exactly - it has nothing to do with election security. Thanks!
So my answer about giving compensation, i..e. bribing, on line, that is illegal in all states is NOT about election security ? really?
I mean you could try and argue the point like a normal poster, but to hilariously proclaim that it makes your point !!
You are sad and lost.
Not unlike:
-
1 minute ago, BillStime said:
You did not answer my question. How does dictating who and where water can be provided MAKE ELECTIONS MORE SECURE?
It is basic.
Probably why you cannot grasp it.
Giving out water (food, cigarettes, money, any compensation) to someone in line to influence their vote has ALWAYS been illegal.
Water can be brought to the line by the voter, or donated water given to the person in line by someone in authority.
These rules hold for ALL lines, not just your invented "non-Whites" lines
It can't be simpler, but sadly, I know that you (and Tibs) won't understand.
-
1 minute ago, billsfan89 said:
I just don't see the "hold the line" argument. If you take down Confederate statues because they are absolutely horrible (and you can preserve history without them) then how does that stop you from stopping them from taking down a Lincoln statue? They are two completely different things. Also it isn't like all this resistance to tearing down Confederate statues are stopping the "wokeists" from going after other landmarks so what success is "holding the line" even having?
I appreciate the response. But again I am rather mystified by your belief that we can just stop "them" from going after Lincoln or others. Have you not been paying attention over the past decade.
Schools want to rename halls now because the students are offended that the people were slaveowners, even though that certainly wasn't why they were chosen.
I really do not see how you can keep claiming that the movement to take down Confederate statues is different from the others..........It is not.
Thanks.
I cannot respond to Tiberius's post as it is (even more than usual) incoherent.
-
9 minutes ago, BillStime said:
How? Because the data shows that nonwhite Georgia voters have to wait in line for hours to vote. Why? Too few polling sites.
HA! You "stopped" reading past the first line. Talk about a weak asssss response.
And what's a lie?
You always make it so easy.
Look back, I clearly said to the other posters that there was "no need" for them to read past the first line but I had.
AND the LIE is the first line about water, but again you KNOW that. 😂
I also like your incredibly racist implication that there are NonWhite voting lines ...............what a hoot.
Sure some areas are majority POC, but 100% ? You keep digging that racist hole son.
-
6 minutes ago, billsfan89 said:
One has nothing to do with the other.
I don't have any problem with the Confederate statues being taken down from public places, you, and 716 are assuming that.
But the left taking down other statues and names DOES have something to do with that
It is the, now demonstrable result of backing down to mob rule. Vote to take down a Rebel statue--------fine, but surely I don't need to post the many videos of leftist tearing down confederate statues with NO consequences.
And what did that lead to ? tearing down Columbus, Washington, Christ, again many videos out there and again hardly any arrests.
That is not "the left doing other annoying things?" as you so poorly characterized my takes.
Actions have consequences
Take down the Confederate states if that is what the majority of Americans want...............I will not split them into groups as done by most here.
But be prepared, once unleashed, wokeism is hard to stop .........that much is being demonstrated in every town, big and small, across the country today.
Thanks.
-
3 minutes ago, BillStime said:
You can't handle the truth anyhow.
You lie.
And then you give a weak ass response.
so typical.
-
2 minutes ago, BillStime said:
How does forbidding the distribution of water to people make voting more secure?
No need to read past the first line.
BillZtime KNOWS that this is NOT true, refuted in every newspaper, but he leads off his spin with it.
-
3 minutes ago, billsfan89 said:
Draw the line at people who were in the Confederacy shouldn't have statues of them in public spaces that many including black people pay for.
But the Left won't stop there.
As argued on page one of this thread
and demonstrated time and time again over the past few years.
-
1 minute ago, Over 29 years of fanhood said:
Whats is it going to take to get people to support a Ban on assault sporks ???First you have to overcome the powerful N.S.A. which has bought Congress.
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, BillStime said:
Why are red states cracking down on voting rights? Why Jim?
They aren't.
Any attempt to repair the broken system is met with fake cries of suppression................but you knew that.
and blue states are holding the line too
-
1 minute ago, Chef Jim said:
Racist Bill?? What makes it racist?
Voters need to use ID's........................racist
-
WaPo fact-checker throws MORE Pinocchios at Biden after he repeats Georgia election law lie
There's no way he could not know this by now, right? It's so farfetched, common sense would tell him it can't be true.
-
1
-
-
AOC wants everybody to remember who ‘helped build these cages in the first place’ (and then it gets awkward)
-
-
You can never be too woke.
‘Obama Is Another Oppressor’: Immigration Activists Protest School Name Change
Immigration activists in Waukegan, Illinois, balked at a proposal that would rename a local middle school after former President Barack Obama.
“I will not be part of renaming a school after someone who did not and does not represent the undocumented community,” Waukegan school board member Edgar Castellanos said at a board meeting, according to ABC 7 Chicago. The school board is currently debating a proposal to rename Thomas Jefferson Middle School due to the third president’s ownership of slaves.
Throughout his presidency, Obama drew criticism on the immigration issue from Republicans and Democrats. Obama implemented the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program by executive order, held unaccompanied minor children in facilities and deported a record 409,849 illegal immigrants in 2012.
“If you’re removing the name of Thomas Jefferson—one oppressor—the name of Obama is another oppressor and our families do not want to see that name,” activist Julie Contreras of the group United Giving Hope told ABC 7 Chicago.
“That’s millions of families that were affected and separated, many of whom reside right here in Waukegan. The fear that many of my friends faced of never seeing their parents again after coming home from school still resonates with me,” Oscar Arias told WBBM NewsRadio.
Obama is the latest Democrat politician to come under fire from school board activists. The San Francisco Board of Education considered renaming Dianne Feinstein Elementary School, along with 43 other schools, although it paused the renaming campaign to focus on reopening schools.
https://dailycaller.com/2021/03/31/barack-obama-oppressor-school-name-change/
-
Same lame pictures over and over..........no imagination.
-
1
-
-
Some lucrative tax breaks for corporations are good (apparently)
😆
-
-
-
1 minute ago, Tiberius said:
So they can't be sued if they make the perfect tool for murderers to murder more people.
Exactly
Guns are legal.
Protected by the constitution for individual American Citizens.
If you "enough is enough" fanatics want to change it.............go ahead.
Combating imaginary racism with actual racism??
in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Posted
"No mention of the perps race in the headline. That is weirdly the most obvious clue to their race nowadays. #JouralismDiesInWokeness."
Says one of the commenters on the Washington Post article "New York authorities file hate-crime charges in attack on Asian American woman."
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/new-york-asian-american-attack/2021/03/31/a583e1ca-924b-11eb-a74e-1f4cf89fd948_story.html
There isn't even an attacker in the headline. The only human beings in the headline are the "authorities" and the "Asian American woman." The evildoer disappears. There's no attacker, only an "attack." But if there are hate crime charges, then the human mind is all important. "Attack" stresses the outward action. "Hate" requires a hater. There is a shadow of a person in the word "hate," the gesture at a mind.
But this person is depersonalized — depersonalized because he is black. If a white man had stomped on an old Asian-American lady, he'd get full recognition in the headline. Is that racist?