PatsFanNH

NOT arguing the QB part but Jimmy G got hit plenty in the Az game... Hmm wasn't Romo from the same school? (Eastern Illinois) IMO and MY OPINION ONLY Jimmy G passed the eye test looks comfy in the pocket and makes the right decision with the football quickly. (I think he was averaging under 3 seconds a throw) Tanahill after 5 years still holds onto the ball to long Fitz throws a lot of dumb passes and no arm strength Tyrod is hard to say he makes amazing plays but then misses wide open receivers in the middle of the field.. This could be Jimmy G to with more time but was Tyrod ever a quick hmthrower in the pocket?

Start with the last one (good post by the way) there is NO RULE against the Patriots hiring a company that Brady owns. I knew about it but since there is no infraction to speak of ..as for the injured and extra players, never heard it even mentioned up here even once. As for Deflategate, I think we both can agree that horse been beaten to death, I will not convince you nor will you convince me.. I admitted to Spygate as fact. And I have never ever once brought up other teams cheating.

That's a good question I do not know.

Neither does the person making the accusations! FACT: NFL stated they control the headsets inside the QB helmet.. Stated after Pats v Steelers game when their idiot coach tried to start something... LOOK IT UP!

Weird I rarely bring up my team, except when needing an example of defending them from stupid attacks. So it's obvious your basing your opinion on this one thread.. Which has really been derailed..

I have never heard Flutie say that it read anything about it. How do you Prove a lie is a lie? You can't Prove Somethibg isn't happening. By far the most ridiculous argument I have ever had with any fan base

What facts have been presented? A 10 year old article with an UNNAMED Source? I mean we know how accurate Mortensen is with his unnamed sources after all.. So as the accuser YOU are to provide evidence of wrong doing, which has not been provided at all an unnamed source from a reporter who has already been proven to have gotten bad information before from "unnamed" sources is hardly proof. NFL came out after last years Pats v Steelers game saying they were in control over the headset and monitoring signals into he headset.

I am not going to argue with you, it's obvious you have your own set of "facts" that no matter how many times your proven wrong you will stick to. So go keep believing your silly lies because if you had ANY clue you would know how absurd your accusation is. Hint: Jimmy G was averaging less than 2 seconds before he grew the ball.. NO ONE CAN RELAY WHAT THEY SEE THAT WUICK. Brady averages roughly about 2-3 seconds but yes instead of being able read a D it's some person way up in the box seats radioing down in less than 3 seconds who to throw to.. DUMBEST CONSPIRACY EVER!

You spend all day at work discussing conspiracy theories in football?! Wow that's an odd job. I also never asked you to explain anything, just saying relying on an article almost 10 years old and nothing ever came of it is rather well lame. But go ahead believe silly conspiracies theory.

Yes and they keep such great records of said pressure. Oh wait they don't. Oh but they know the ideal gas law? Nope they didn't I know they know how fast someone can take air out of 13 balls! Nope oh I know this is it.. They released the true findings and never let any false information remain out there? Hmm NOPE. Deflategate was a joke, Spygate was legit. These delusion of radio waves.. Is just a silly conspiracy theory..

See Denver D isn't as scary as last year IMO. Newton had ample ability put more points on them and failed miserably and well Indy kind of sucks!

Ok I am going stop before I say something that will get me in trouble. But your proof is Mortenson and an OLD 2007 article. I can handle Spygate crap, and even Deflategate (to a point) but this!! COME ON MAN!!

The way the TEAM played on Thursday I am not shocked they dropped to 30. With The Pats having the 3rd string QB IN FOR Thursday I see a short stay at #1 for them.

I was so waiting for the "football for dumbies" lol (see water boy lol)

Except the head set is shut down via the NFL who controls them before the snap. God I love these conspiracy theories, can't just be a QB smart enough pick a teams D apart nope must be cheating.. Sigh

Hmm I probably should ad who would be your coach as that would def determine what type of QB you would have.. (So has be a coordinator or an out of work HC right now) so I would hire Josh McDaniels as I think he is ready for his second shot as HC and could do the job.

Hmm I didn't think of that, but then who would you have as your WB for that fill in year or would you draft one to start?

No BB will not tolerate stupid penalties. The Pats had A safety, whose name escapes me, who made it to the pro bowl that year BUT since he had like 5 leading with the helmet penalties he did not make the team the next year. Hell he traded Randy Moss back to the Vikings for draft position lol

That was my hesitation on Jimmy as well, and Tyrod per bills fans, doesn't see the middle of the field well. But they are better than the other options in the AFCE right now.

You have a choice of 5 QB's Tryrod Tanahill Fitz Jimmy G 3rd pick in NFL Draft this year (probably get the #2 QB out of college) If it's the ND QB (Kizer) at 3 I would take him, otherwise it would be between Tyrod and Jimmy G. My reasoning is this they are both young and have a HUGE Upside, while Tanahill is mediocre at best and gawd awful at times, and Fitz is just to old and well no upside.

I think if what you are thinking was true someone would spill the beans by now... Especially since the refs been screwed more than once by the NFL.

IMO no one would be complaining if 2 things had happened: 1. Watkins wasn't so injury prone. (Which he wasn't in college so Whaley had no way knowing this IMO) 2. You had a QB who can get him the football.

You do know the LEAGUE shuts down communication between the sideline and QB right? You do know THEY have full control over the communication right?

Very true, I would ad the QB has to be able to make quick reads of the defense as 80% of the plays the ball is out within 2 - 3 seconds. Eavesdropping? You mean the paranoid league which can never find anything? Sort of like the headset crap, which is controlled by the league and set up by the league... But sadly people say "Pats are cheating" sigh

Wait your going to steam roll the Cards, but only win by 4 against the Pats who will probably have the third string QB in there? Huh? Did I miss something?