Jump to content

nkreed

Community Member
  • Posts

    836
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by nkreed

  1. Just now, jimmy10 said:


    I am kind of digging this. If I cared much about the game it would irritate me though. 
     

    I think the line to gain animation is good, it really sticks out with the moving slime...It's not as bad as I think may believe.  It's definitely aimed to get the younger crowd to stay interested. However as a person who dabbles in graphics here and there, its extremely well done,.

  2. 1 minute ago, Warcodered said:

    I'd file that with agreeing to stop discriminating against Black tenants while not having to admit to having done so.

    There has been some awakening on race, by whites, since the mid 80s. I think that while there is blamed to be placed, racism was instituted well before and the policy makes in the 80's just had a different view. As America decides it's finally okay to speak about these ideas is incremental progress. Let's keep making it more of a conversation that or legislative electors understand.

    1 minute ago, Warcodered said:

    It's more of a PPP site.....and oh yeah the Bills too stuck on the side.

    But which bot is going to call me an idiot?

  3. Just now, DCOrange said:

    It could be 0 votes or it could be a little under 9k. Either way, the general belief is that those votes won't help Trump. They'll likely break even or possibly help expand Biden's lead.

    Yes even at 9k votes it's that spread between the candidates that changes the leads. So a 55:45 split in favor of Trump only translates into a max 900 vote difference in change, assuming no 3rd party candidates are voted for.

     

    I am quoting you but not directing that statement at you. I just wanted to make sure that it would be hard to have 9k ballots make major changes.

    • Like (+1) 1
  4. 11 minutes ago, snafu said:

     

    It may not be that difficult. 

    The Supreme Court put out one decision prior to the election.

    — Wisconsin wasn’t allowed to count ballots received after election day

    — They declined to hear the same issue for PA, but it is still an open case in front of SC. 

     

    So so if the Court comes back and says that PA can’t count late ballots then that changes things. I’m not sure what the GA, NC, NV, AZ rules are regarding counting ballots received after Election Day. But the point is that Trump wouldn’t have to change votes. 

     

     

    In PA all of those "late ballots" have been sequestered and have not been counted at all. It doesn't change anything. There is a BIG difference between counting those that were received after Tuesday and counting days after the election. The conservative media has purposely been blurring these lines to make it seem like the ballots counted in PA right now have been received AFTER Tuesday.

  5. 7 minutes ago, DrDawkinstein said:

    Waking up to see we've given Biden a 1100 vote lead in GA!! Let's Gooooo!!

     

     

     

     

    No sarcasm detector needed, but your Desperation Detector should be screaming.

    My desperation detector broke in '16. I have been saying I needed to get a new one since. Thanks!

    20 minutes ago, LeGOATski said:

    oh...he believes it alright. He believes it HARD.

    I guess Trump's team could go after Arizona, too...but they simply weren't prepared to do so. That's the state that took them by total surprise.

    Disputing the election was premeditated by them.

    I don't disagree on the disputing of the election was premeditated.

     

    At this point I don't believe that his disputes can lead to a change in these results, however.  He will need to find Federal statues to bring these disputes to the Supreme Court.

  6. 9 minutes ago, Big Gun said:

    Only if you believe there was no ballot fraud in Wisconsin, Michigan, Nevada, Arizona, Pennsylvania, etc

     

    The fraud is so vast, it will be exposed and Biden will not be in the WH

     

     

    My sarcasm detector hasn't been calibrated in a few hours, care to let me know if it should be going off on this post.

     

    The only thing that strikes me here as possible you believe this is that you included Arizona. It's the only state that hasn't been criticized as having been fraud by Trump. 

  7. NYTimes has this on their live results for Arizona.

     

    We just received more votes from Gila County. According to turnout estimates, around 310,000 votes remain in counties won by Trump in 2016. Clinton 2016 counties have around 70,000 votes left to report. 3m ago

     

    So for context, however here's the 2016 map.  https://www.nytimes.com/elections/2016/results/arizona


    Maricopa was won by trump in 16.  It is likely many of those 310,000 remaining votes.  According to NYT's estimates, the MAX votes that are in all other counties would be 45,498 ballots. That would mean that ~264K votes are coming from Maricopa. I believe that its unlikely that Trump makes that up.

  8. 1 minute ago, jrober38 said:

     

    Agreed.

     

    The Democrat elites need to come to grips with the fact that populism is what people from both parties want and they need to start catering more to their base, which is much farther to the left than where Biden ran. 

    The only benefit I see in them failing to do this would be a change to a Three Party System, which would help the voting process out IMMENSELY!   (IMO)

×
×
  • Create New...