Jump to content

ganesh

Community Member
  • Posts

    15,895
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by ganesh

  1. Moulds has had 10 TDs in the last three years (3.3 per year average). That and the fact I've had it with this topic is the reason I'm actually glad he's gone. We can now talk about something else besides Moulds for a change. Bills fans don't need to pine for players that were looking for the door.

    652274[/snapback]

     

    Exactly.....Moulds TDs % is way down....Even when he had DB for two years...

    Plus he failed to protect his young QB last year....Just for a lack of leadership

    he should be gone.....Thanks for the memories EM...and Good luck with

    the Houston Texans...

  2. DT and guard are far bigger need areas than OT, which is pretty well set right now. gandy and peters are going to perform better next year than anyone the bills draft at the position.

    651609[/snapback]

     

    On what basis ? Gandy proved that he is a avg LT, who doesn't make mistakes

    but cannot over power anyone.....

     

    As far as Peters, the last I checked the stats, he helped in 1 100 yard rushing

    game in about 10 starts.

  3. Somebody remind me why the Bills let Sammy go. Was it because of the breakout potential of Burns?

    651476[/snapback]

     

    No. Sammy wanted an oppurtunity to play more RB and he wasn't going to

    get it here with TH and WM as 1 and 2......and Miami did not have a RB, so

    there was more oppurtunity to play RB there....and in fact he might even

    have started a few games for them.....

     

    He was a good ST player while here....

  4. I knew my sig would stir up some controversy.

     

    Back in 2001, Travis Henry didn't provide enough of an upgrade over Antowain Smith to have been worth a 2nd round pick.  In 2003, Willis McGahee didn't provide enough of an upgrade over Henry to have been worth a 1st round pick.  The offensive line suffered because of this excessive attention to the RB spot.  A decent back behind a great line will do better than a great back behind a lousy line.

    651441[/snapback]

    Agreed...Case in point....a washed up Bettis, an average Staley and a

    undrafted FA Speedy Parker all were able to run over teams regularly with

    that dominating OL the steelers put in front of them.

  5. thats crazy.

     

    trade away a young tallented #1 CB AND draft picks for a college player who hasnt even stepped on to a nfl field, much less played in a NFL game.

     

    remember the last top 5 OT we drafted? everyone said he was a lock to be a beast at OT... hes not even on our team anymore.

     

    resign clements. and draft a player who falls to us. most likly, a great player will still be on the board at our pick.

    650892[/snapback]

     

    Another Top 3 OT who was a can't miss in the draft, Robert Gallery, is struggling to win the RT or RG spot with the Oakland Raiders.....

     

    I agree...we should re-sign Clements and address other issues...We need to trade down, if at all.....Not trade up......Too many holes to fill...

  6. I found a video tape of that game (Bills/Packers 8/20/05).  You are correct, Marv had some nice things to say about Losman's performance, but warned a few times, that he was still very raw....

     

    What I found more interesting, however, was watching Craig Nall in the second half.  While the Packers didn't score, Nall made a couple of really nice, hard throws, in the middle of the field, granted, against the scrubbiest of the Bills scrubs.  He was actually pretty impressive, albeit pre-season. If you recall, in that particular game, the Bills defense was blitzing on nearly every down.  Nall hung in the pocket  pretty well, and made some plays.  No happy feet!  I wonder if Marv had this game in mind, when he went after Nall...

    650961[/snapback]

     

     

    One other issue that might go against JP is how much Marv values Van Millers thoughts...If I remeber Nick (From England) mentioning that Miller kept bitching in the PressBox about how JP is very inaccurate QB....If Marv values opinions like that then JP is really going to be in the dog house....

     

    Again, my question is where is Juron's voice in all this ?

  7. Options

    1) Marv spoke with J.P.  He told him that they want him to be the bills QB, so ignore what they hear in the media, because its a draft ploy.  Then Marv "leaks"word they are looking to trade JP, in hopes some team leapfrogs us, takes a QB and someone falls to us.

    2) Marv really doesnt like JP.  He feels he has no leadership skills, and there is no way he will ever succeed.  Hard to believe.  JP is a hard worker with exceptional talent.  That did not transfer to the field last year, but its hard to believe you can give up on a guy after what we saw last season.

    3) Marv wants to take a QB, but he knows he cant with JP, KH and Nall on the roster.  He has to open up a spot, and it makes to get rid of JP, as nall and KH wont be a distraction and would be willing to help a new QB.

     

    I dont know whats true..but knowing marv and JPs personality, I suspect #1 might be the truth here.

    651042[/snapback]

     

    Where is Dick Jurons opinion in all this....Are we going to have an autocratic rule

    again

  8. Isn't Faine the constantly injured, underachieving and lazy center from the Browns?  And wasnt he the one the Browns were SO satisfied with...they immediately bolted out in FA and signed a big name replacement for him?

     

    Yep...sounds like a Bill to me.

    648361[/snapback]

     

    May be a change of scenery will help him.....The guy had good credentials

    coming out of the draft.

  9. From CNN/SI Trades & Rumors section

     

    Cleveland center Jeff Faine, who is on the trading block, has expressed an interest in joining the Packers, but it would take at least a fourth-round pick for the Packers to get him and it's unclear whether they would be willing to do that.

    -- Milwaukee Journal Sentinel

     

    May be we get the 4th from houston for EM and give it to Cleveland for Faine.

  10. You know, that imo was a great post until the last sentence, because I know so little about Nall, and watching Holcombe start for an entire season would probably wreck what little is left of my rather weak stomach.  :doh:  ;)

    647876[/snapback]

     

    Right on the Dot........JP was benchd becaused a coward coach wanted to

    save his job and also wanted to give in to the demands of veteran players

    like a Moulds....JP did not do himself a favor by not playing well....but with

    the kind of team we had, there was not going to be a chance for him to

    get that shot.

  11. I agree, the maturity problem seemed well documented, if this is how it plays out  perhaps it was just Teflon taking another reach.

     

    From what I've witnessed since JP became a pro is if he does have a maturity problem I think it has a lot to do with his expectations. The combination of a lack of humbleness and the inability to back it up will not go along very well with NFL players, especially when it's coming from a QB.  JP acted as if he should be held to the standard of a hall of fame QB, and openly discussed his goal of being the best ever. Both of these feelings would be positive with a player who had the humbleness to keep those thoughts inside but JP didn't. Veterans know how difficult the NFL is and I don't see them siding with a guy who has these outlooks when on the field he can't muster anything to back it up.

    647850[/snapback]

     

    I don't know where this "JP is not humble" came from.....Every time we lost,

    JP took lot of blame on himself...He was not blaming his coaches or his horrible

    OL or lack of a running game......It is really idiotic to say that JP acted like a

    HoF QB....There is no proof to something like that....

  12. All very valid points made by the guy. One thing that was interestingly missing from the results though was any mention of zone , or even double coverage. The analysis leads one to believe he (or any receiver) gets man coverage on every down...

    645155[/snapback]

     

    The biggest thing I see the difference between Moulds and other Top-Tier

    WRs is the # of TDs he gets....especially in the redzone

  13. Alright kids, if Houston is the front runner for Erics' services. Would it be out of the realm of possibility that we trade our 8th, our second rounder and Eric for the #1 overall. and maybe a comp. pick for next years draft maybe a 3rd or something.I doubt it but just throwin it out there. Would like some feed back.GO BILLS!FINS SUCK!MARINO SHOULD ROT IN HELL AND DIE OF GONAREA or however you spell it.

    643135[/snapback]

     

    And what do you plan to do with the #1 overall pick ?

  14. I'd take it.

    642453[/snapback]

     

     

    1st we need draft picks to address multiple positions...I hope this regime

    does not throw draft picks away like the previous one.....Plus Walker will

    sit out until he gets the mega contract......We have to avoid giving the

    big contract to the new WR.......Evans contract will be coming up soon....

  15. i thought GB wanted moulds plus our 3rd round pick plus a 4th next year, in return for walker and GBs 5th this year.  I don't think Walker for a 5th rounder str8 up id realistic.

     

    Brandon Lloyd went to washington for a 3rd + a 4th in 2007.  Walker is worth at least that much

    643247[/snapback]

     

    If Walker and Lloyd are worth that much, don't you think EM is worth at least

    that especially if the team is desparate to make the splash of its own

  16. What's going to hurt us is Mike Gandy started 16 games at left tackle and Bennie Anderson starter ( I believe 15 ) at LG. Jonas Jennings and Pat Williams signed huge contracts, but Jonas didn't play 1 snap for the 49ers. That's going to hurt the Bills chances of getting anything higher than a 6 or a 7.

    642686[/snapback]

     

    Add in Holcomb who started 8 games

  17. All Peterson cares about is being .500 to keep arrowhead full. Thats his goal year in and year out. The Chiefs haven't improved in major need areas in a long while.

    643048[/snapback]

     

     

    Looks like TD is in disguise....May be Lamar Hunts wants it that way and

    if Carl is given his wish, he will probably field a different team...

     

    One thing though, every year the Chiefs are in the fight to make the

    playoffs....but with San Diego and Denver also playing very well it has been

    hard for the Chiefs make that extra step, considering the talent they have

    on the O side of the football....Lot of that blame should go Trent Green....

    TG puts up the #s, but I can never see him as a team leader to lead a

    team....sort of a ROb Johnson.

  18. He easily is, and I'd love to keep him around and even have him retire as a Bill, but sometimes you do have to go in a new direction. I think this is one of those times. The money due to moulds could be better served along the trenches thats my only issue with it. Otherwise I'd love to have him stay.

    643031[/snapback]

     

    My only concern is that, will the new regime spend the new cap money on

    quality OL and DL ?

×
×
  • Create New...