Bangarang
-
Posts
18,299 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Bangarang
-
-
13 hours ago, MJS said:
That's what I'm doing. I'm discussing people's lack of knowledge and speculating that they know nothing about these players.
Logic had one of the best typing gauntlet times among other posters here. His reply speed is faster than it looks.
-
1
-
-
We've reached EJ Manuel level of mental gymnastics to try and convince ourselves he's going to be good.
Watching his targets and catches, this kid consistently has DBs draped all over him.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
-
I doubt a true difference maker is going to sign immediately after the draft. I wouldn't get my hopes up
-
3
-
1
-
-
No, not at all.
-
He is fun to listen to. Kid says all the right things and will be a fan favorite if he can make plays to help this team win.
-
1
-
2
-
-
Stand up rush LBer similar to Von. Could be a sleeper pick
-
2
-
-
2 minutes ago, VW82 said:
Decent case made here he winds up as a big slot
So we'll have Kincaid, Coleman, Shakir and Samuel all in the slot? We are revolutionizing offense
-
1
-
-
Here's a guy who respects the process
-
Dependable C at UGA. I like the value here
-
1 minute ago, Process said:
Keon Coleman, big KJ Hamler fan
Bizarre. I bet he can't wait to pick Justin Shorter's brain and learn all that he can from him
-
7
-
-
Just now, HappyDays said:
Just from a high level philosophy, drafting a safety and a RB with two of our first four picks is bad strategy. The players might be good. But there is extremely low upside with that strategy. It's the two least valuable positions on the team.
it's not even the fact that we drafted another RB in the 4th. The dude is old and is going to see his rookie contract and that's it.
-
1
-
-
3 minutes ago, The Jokeman said:
Cuz injuries happen and there was a run on the position.
We plucked Ty Johnson off the streets and he was a productive back behind Cook.
-
1
-
1
-
-
2 minutes ago, ColoradoBills said:
Ray Davis.
No. Ty Johnson has earned that spot right now
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
-
He'll be 25 in November. I don't see why Beane is obsessed with RBs this early.
-
2
-
-
A 4th round punter is hilarious
-
1
-
1
-
-
4 minutes ago, davefan66 said:
Shakir will be over 900 yards. His RAC is very excellent. Dude just catches the ball. Watch his highlights - watches the ball into his hands, sucks the ball in and into position for a football move immediately, turns upfield as soon as he has the ball with little hesitation. I feel he is underrated. Samual at 800? I'm good with that. Coleman if he is brought along should get 500 plus yards, if fed the ball could do much better. Kincaid could be near 1000 yards if used properly.
I feel our WR room is better. Diggs was a problem in the locker room, good move to remove that problem. Davis dropped so many balls last year that would have made a difference in games. Glad he is gone so we can stop force feeding a dude that couldn't get the job done.Our WR room is 100% not better. That's utterly ridiculous.
-
1
-
1
-
-
3 minutes ago, BullBuchanan said:
I think there's a difference between game changing players and super stars when it comes to WRs. KC just won back to back Super Bowls with Kelce and a pile of JAGs.
Shakir and Kincaid changed the game plenty last year with big plays. So did Cook. If Shakir can scale his production across more volume, Kincaid continues his progression, and Samuel hits career average numbers, we shouldn't have any issue with having enough receiving weapons to get the ball to, especially when you toss in Cook, Knox, the rookie, and a potential for Shorter to do something.
FWIW I'ma big believer in Shakir. I think he'll post top 30 WR numbers. I also think Kincaid will. If Coleman can be good for 600-700 and Samuel around the same, I think we'll be in a decent spot.Could we still use another guy? Sure, most teams could. It'll only be a problem if we start suffering injuries.
I genuinely hate the KC comparison. We don't have one of the greatest offensive minds in history developing our offense. At least KC had Kelce who admittedly is on the tail end of his career but still draws a lot of attention from opposing defenses. I don't see anyone on our roster doing that right now.
You think Shakir will be a 1,000 yard receiver? Because that's top 30 WR territory. Id be surprised if that were to happen.
I think there's going to be a lot of growing pains on offense now that we're putting a lot of pressure on young players to pick up the slack left behind.
-
1
-
-
Just now, davefan66 said:
Shakir will have a great season. Samuel will be very good. Kincaid will most likely be more of a passing threat this year, as well as Cook.
Coleman will be much better than he is getting credit for.
Allen should elevate the WR room. He couldn't do so with Davis last year, but that was on Davis.
What's a great season for Shakir exactly? I think people are overating him a lot right now.
Samuel will be what Samuel has always been which is a guy who will probably get 600-800 yards with some gadget plays sprinkled in and a handful of TDs.
Our offense is objectively worse right now and I don't see anyone on day 3 changing things
-
1
-
1
-
-
Just now, BullBuchanan said:
Not sure that's needed if your goal is winning a Super Bowl someday.
Game changing players aren't needed?
Where would we be if we didn't trade for Diggs and instead relied on John Brown, Beasley and Gabe to be our top 3 WRs? We are worse than that right now.
-
7 minutes ago, davefan66 said:
I honestly see our top WR's pretty much set.
We have Coleman, Shakir, Samuel, Hollins. Also have Justin Shorter, Isabella and KJ Hammer. I see a 5th rounder if there is someone they like.
Shorter, Hamler, Hollins and Isabella are wild cards as to how good they will be. Should get 1 or 2 out them to be productive. Shorter being the most promising.
Hollins isn't a wildcard, he's a jag. Our WR room is nothing but complimentary pieces. I don't see a single guy that can step on the field and scare defenses while catching 8-10 balls
-
1
-
-
Just now, Ralonzo said:
Who are you drafting here to crack that top-3?
Likely nobody and that's the problem
-
1
-
1
-
-
Just now, Ralonzo said:
It's fine. The top-3 WR are set for the Bills. They can add an upside guy to develop anytime today.
What an unimpressive top 3 it is
-
4
-
-
Shame Franklin is gone
-
1
-
-
4 minutes ago, JakeFrommStateFarm said:
I think Baldy summed it up nicely. Coleman hasn't played WR that long and is still learning "nuances" of the game. He's a bit of a project and needs time to learn.
He can't separate at 4.61 so he'll have a CB or safety in his hip pocket.
But Bills look to throw him jump balls where he can go up and out leap the smaller defensive backs using his basketball skills to box out. That's how FSU used him.
A better Gabe is what it looks like.
We needed so much more than just a jump ball guy. Our WR room is so mediocre.
-
1
-
2
-
1
-
New Bills WR. Former Lion Quintez Cephus
in The Stadium Wall
Posted
One could argue the entire WR room is nothing but jags