Jump to content

Bangarang

Community Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    18,231

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Posts posted by Bangarang

    Why the Bills don't "need" a traditional X receiver

    in The Stadium Wall

    Posted · Edited by Bangarang

    I like Kincaid a lot, but he's still just a 2nd year TE. Knox at this point is nothing more than a complimentary piece on offense to me and not someone I'm going to put a lot of hope in being a big factor for us.

     

    Right now, our WR room is Shakir, Samuel, Shorter and Hollins. That's pitiful. Even if we trade up for a guy like Odunze, I still think our WR group isn't that strong. 

    • Like (+1) 2
    • Dislike 1

    Diggs traded to Texans for picks

    in The Stadium Wall

    Posted

    6 minutes ago, Captain Hindsight said:

    Luckily we don't plan a game next weekend. Plenty of time to get that sorted out 

     

    Even with one of the top WRs in the draft I'm still not a fan of our WR room. We'd be praying he has an elite year otherwise the offense is probably going to struggle pretty consistently 

    • Agree 1

    2024 WR Draft Class

    in The Stadium Wall

    Posted

    9 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

    Having two #2s next year and no Diggs makes a trade into the top 15 this year using #28 and our 25 1st rounder much more likely IMO.

     

    Still a pretty weak room if you ask me. It's hard to see how this team got better so far. 

    • Agree 3

    Dalton Kincaid’s 1st season highlights

    in The Stadium Wall

    Posted

    53 minutes ago, ddaryl said:

    About an 80% catch target ratio

    Not shabby for a rookie 

    Shakir also was about 80% 

    Gabe never hit 60% in his career

     

    Gabe's ADOT was 15 yards. Shakir's was 8.9 and Kincaid's was 6. Gabe's role was much different than both of those guys so I would expect his catch percentage to be lower but admittedly it probably shouldn't have been as low as it was.

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Agree 1

    CURTIS SAMUEL A BILL

    in The Stadium Wall

    Posted · Edited by Bangarang

    17 minutes ago, Chandler#81 said:

    and you know this ‘how’, exactly? Your crystal ball or your crystal meth?

     

    His entire body of work maybe? Or is it the meth you're taking that makes you think a guy who's been a complementary piece on offense for the last 7 years is going to suddenly emerge and become a bonafide #2 guy? Do you also believe Mack Hollins is the replacement for Diggs as well?

    • Like (+1) 1

    We are set at WR. Maybe we’ll grab one in Round 6.

    in The Stadium Wall

    Posted

    3 minutes ago, BringBackFergy said:

    OK, I'll amend it: We now have a younger, speedy WR like Tyreek Hill minus the cash payoffs to injury victims.

     

    Why are you so desperate to put them in the same sentence as if they are comparable players? 

     

    If you're expecting Samuel to be a good #2 then you're setting yourself up for major disappointment.

    • Disagree 1

    We are set at WR. Maybe we’ll grab one in Round 6.

    in The Stadium Wall

    Posted

    2 minutes ago, BringBackFergy said:

    All this talk about "We need a young deep threat" in the 1st round.  Stop trying to control that which cannot be controlled. Our younger, speed threat is now on the team.

     

    Tyreek Hill, Age 30, 40 time: 4.29

    Curtis Samuel, Age 27, 40 time: 4.31

     

    Fair comparison.  Look for Brady to use Samuel with a lot of motion and 15 yd slants which go for 30 - 40 yds.  Would you take Tyreek Hill as a suitable #2? Yes.  I give you a younger Tyreek Hill already on our team.

     

     

     

    What a ridiculous comparison

×
×
  • Create New...