dayman

"no name"

Bills 2 Jets -0

Jets never had a QB when they built up and now their window is starting to close. As chaotic as they seem they could still be ok this year despite what Jets fans will say. In any event...Sanchez is the problem.

...so there's 1 guy....time to spend some high picks on O and hit on them.

Also a look at some panthers picks I didn't bother doing pats or panthers...on a different board where I posted this fans of other teams just started looking at their own stuff and posting...just good to see some picks of other teams...obviously this here is just offense in general ours would look different if I did that. Just figured I would post although it means nothing really. cam: 1st double trouble: both 1st (their RBS) tolbert: undrafted smitty: 3rd lafell: 3rd olsen: 1st gross: 1st silatolu: 2nd kalil: 1st hangartner: 6th i think bell: undrafted average is a 3rd rounder... (i did bell and tolbert as 8s) I assume they will struggle when it's all said and done b/c I don't think we're very talented. It's that simple. I'm not bashing I hope we do ok but I don't see a lot of talent at QB or WR on this team and don't expect a great offense throughout the entire course of the season. I think we can get hot, and if the defense plays well and gets timely turnovers we can win some games maybe even creep into playoffs...but the bottom line IMO (people can disagree of course) is that when I look at this passing game...I don't see much or expect much even if we find a way to string a few games together at some point. And here was an interesting post going the other way re: picks haha: Jacksonville Jaguars: 2011 season Blaine Gabbert- 1st MJD: 2nd Mike Thomas: 4th Jason Hill: 3rd Marcedes Lewis: 1st (Throw in some random 3rd string WR): 8 Average of 3.16; 2.2 if you remove random undrafted guy. A 3.16 was the worst offense in the league last year. ...I won't post any more but SF has a lot of 1s and sucks also (as a 9ers fan posted on a different board)..and like I said to start w/ it's not some proof or anything...it's just interesting to look at our team and realize that compared to draft itself we basically have a "free" passing game in terms of draft picks....so when we struggle...I'm no surprised. Investment doesn't always pay off...and there are steals..but when across the board you have made no investment that is still on the team or contributing then how can you complain?

Looking at the Pats for some perspective...great offense w/ a few famous low picks playing... Brady: 6th Lloyd: 4th Welker: Undrafted Branch: 2nd Gronk: 2nd Hernandez: 4th Edelman: 7th Slater: 5th Ebert: 7th Holley: Undrafted Taylor: Undrafted Averages a 5.5 starters - (taken as: brady, branch, gronk, hernandez, welker, lloyd) - 4.3

Where you are drafted doesn't really mean a whole lot. Where everyone on a unit was drafted may mean a little bit more. It's late and I can't sleep so what the hell. Let's have a look. Fitz - 7 Jackson - 2 Johnson- 7 Jones – undrafted (8) Nelson – undrafted (8) Graham – 3rd Hagan – 3rd Martin – undrafted (8) Kamar Aiken – undrafted (8) Naaman Roosevelt – undrafted (8) Marcus Easley – 4th Chandler – 4th Total average – 5.8 Total average minus a rookie and guy who signed yesterday – 6.5 “Starters” (taken as: fitz, Johnson, jones, nelson, chandler) – 6.8 hmmm...we have basically a starting 3 WR crew with TE that is basically 7th round "talent." This comes from a talent pool as a hole that is not much better...and w/ out a rookie and backup QB signed yesterday is basically the same. Obviously that's not the whole story, not by a long shot. But something to think about when we go out there and struggle. In a pass happy, score at all costs league, this is where what we have came from in a league wide draft....basically the last round.

hehe typical LAMaybin

In response to Mike messing up and that being un-mike-like...Mike's been messing up over and over this season. Mike is good, but he's good in a controlled atmosphere and in making sure that controlled atmosphere is what he's working with. Walt changes the game. Walt is chaos, oddly enough he thrives in chaos...and Mike can't lock things down. Also...as for turning his back on Walt...c'mon now who in the world would think Walt would kill Mike... Behind the scenes on Mike's death and goodbye to the crew... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KYwQ7mW_JHE&list=FLJcAGGviXfI58PvYeu1JWdA&feature=mh_lolz

Herman Cain's Daily Show appearances are nothing short of comedic gold.

Talked about how he's spending his own money and actively investigating the "coordinated conspiracy to discredit his character" during the GOP primary. Says he won't say more b/c he doesn't want to jeopardize the ability to pursue this in the future since he doesn't have the rock solid proof yet, but he says he's got an idea and is spending money and investigating it now and is not letting it go b/c his "character and reputation are much more than dollars." I don't know why I thought it was interesting...I guess I just figured it's politics plain and simple and someone wanted him taken down could have been any number of other GOP candidates....so it seemed odd that he would say these things as if it was somehow special what happened to him given that he just fell under attack and it happens to everybody.

If by veiled he means a full on hour devoted to blasting the Tea Party in the 2nd or 3rd episode then...yes it was veiled. I like Newsroom though, it's a pretty good show. Started rough but got better.

Paul being on his way out decided wisely that even though they get knocked around, the lasting legacy of his movement has a better chance succeeding if it infiltrates rather than if it breaks off. Nothing to be ashamed about there, politics are politics.

I think I saw some video from the lander's view point...it was (predictably) just a bunch of yellow/orange fuzziness.

Tell me you weren't one of the maniacs voting for "Tea Party Rubio" when he ran against Crist as a madman.

As a Floridian good for Charlie. He was torpedoed by the anti-moderate GOP push to take over our state. And it isn't local money either. We are a naturally red state and that's fine. But we aren't this brand of Red, and Crist was ousted and everyone in Florida knows why and how and by who and how most of us like what we have now. !@#$ the Florida Tea Party plain and simple. Nobody in this state gives a !@#$ about Rubio and Scott is a piece of disastrous **** who would cut of his nose to spite all of Floridian's faces. This state's GOP is coming back to the middle or we're going purple even in state elections. I like this op-ed. I like what it means for our state. And say what you want about Bill Nelson but you would think he's the damn devil if you watch tv and live where I live. Meanwhile...nothing from his side. No superpack in the tank for him. Every commercial break is a superpack add against him, the others are grandma's talking about kids moving back in their homes b/c Obama killed America.

They're both bad NFL QBs it's that simple. At least TJ can be a bad QB in a normalish system. Tebow can only be a bad QB in a dumbed down 1950s system. Tebow is a great guy, great college QB, strong work ethic and possibly a good leader in certain locker rooms...but he's dumb as a brick has a slow release is not accurate and can't play NFL QB. Jackson.

One thing we could have is more athletic LBs. Draft delusions aside...we could have that. That said we wouldn't have a better starting 4 DL than we do now.

!@#$ Walter

I really had a better impression of TJ than you guys maybe I'm wrong? Why do you all think he's so terrible?

Bring back subtitles!

Hehe I have to admit Trump has done it again...rumors he'll "fire" an Obama impersonator at the convention. Obviously a minor sideshow but I will laugh I have to admit. Also if I was Romney I would do more quasi-racist things as a campaign I heard one guy on the radio make a point I agree w/.....small swing voter base in this election as many have said but you can still turn some people on that otherwise might not be and nothing turns on potential conservative voters like knowing liberals hate you...internal Mitt discussions are more politically in-tune than me but they must at least be having this debate...if they think it can work a bit and increase base enthusiasm in what most think is a turn-out election they'll have no choice but to do it. This isn't McCain.

hehe I stand by my original thesis here...once again not predicting a Biden slam dunk or even a "win" (if there is such thing) but a better performance than you all are assuming...he's a goofball and probably a bit retarded and certainly a liability in the hypersensitive media world out there .... but he's capable of making it through a VP debate that nobody cares about ... total prediction nobody can know the future and it's certainly buying low even to make this statement but here I am making it. More importantly I can't stress enough that nobody will care in the end. The politics of the moment distract us but Biden can walk on stage and do a little debate w/ out throwing a bomb either way...and even more true is that Ryan can't possibly walk out on stage at a VP debate and throw a meaningful bomb b/c after all it's a VP debate. And even given that it doesn't matter I still can't stress enough...Biden can do it well enough. There's all kinds of stuff (certainly now) people can use to call him goofy and he is...but there is a long career of stuff that can be shown that he can handle this VP debate don't be so caught up in faux-hype against Biden or for Ryan. I'm no here calling Biden great (God forbid) but let's not get out of hand. And also...I'm not attacking Ryan in this post but the boy-genius man love isn't something that I would just bank on translating into reality both politically or even in terms of governing genius (I know that is devil speak to you guys)...hype all around that means nothing Ryan will be Ryan and Biden won't be a caveman and nobody will care in the end b/c it's VP debate.

LOL only on PPP

hehe, no need I get it I don't stop looking up just b/c I post again when it's quick posting...and like I said I respect both Clinton and Bush (W) but it's easy to be a "statesman" when you have 2 terms and are retired from politics I'm mainly thinking about those still involved be it in government or still active/could be in government soon...most people who know anything about W know his aids contribution is probably the most of any president and the Clinton intuitive and even Haiti efforts w/ both Bush's were noble etc...but generally speaking I'm leaning towards wondering about current active politicians or possible future players who really can be seen as statesman in the moment (no just presidents btw) EDIT: Actually oddly enough while controversial I think Hillary could qualify somewhat btw...now that I think about it...not on some ultra high level but her stock is high