dayman

who mods the moderators?

Notice OC is nowhere to be found tonight lol

CNN shows 49/49 in NC according the GOP exit polling...that is shocking

Well some other guy on CNN was quite clear and said they thought they were behind by 5 in the latest and final look

CNN guy says source told him Romney thought they would lose Ohio by 5 points in the final analysis

So will Fox get into exit polling early this year?

Obama, Nelson, and a no party affiliated House candidate

http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20121106/METRO02/211060410/Southfield-Twp-voter-appears-die-then-asks-Did-vote-?odyssey=tab|topnews|text|FRONTPAGE Man dies while voting, saved, first question "did i vote?"

Spinach artichoke dip in oven, 12 pack in fridge, time for a late night of election coverage.

pretty sure Clinton always carried Arkansas

Before I go to sleep I shall bump this to the top...update a final prediction...if you don't have flash it just gives Obama 201 and Romney 191 since you don't have flash you can't really change that but I will post the swing states so you can do them as you wish if you would like: FL 29 NC 15 VA 13 PA 20 NH 4 OH 18 MI 16 WI 10 IA 6 CO 9 NV 6 Assign them a candidate and add it up yourself if you can't use flash

First Poll before 1st debate: Will Win Obama: 19 ( TheNewBills, DC Tom, drinkTHEkoolaid, BiggieScooby, fjl2nd, /dev/null, erynthered,Albany,n.y., Max Fischer, ajzepp, In-A-Gadda-Levitre, ....lybob, The Big Cat, B-Large,Fezmid, Joe Miner, chicot, Duck_dodgers007, PastaJoe) Will Win romney: 11 (KD in CT, B-Man, Rob's House, meazza, TheMadCap, PearlHowardman, Dante,Cinga, Wacka, VABills, 1billsfan) Want to win Obama: 13 (TheNewBills, BiggieScooby, fjl2nd, /dev/null, Albany,n.y., Max Fischer, In-A-Gadda-Levitre, ....lybob, The Big Cat, B-Large, chicot, Duck_dodgers007, PastaJoe) Want to win Romney: 17 (DC Tom, KD in CT, B-Man, Rob's House, meazza, drinkTHEkoolaid, TheMadCap,erynthered, PearlHowardman, ajzepp, Dante, Cinga, Wacka, VABills, 1billsfan, Fezmid,Joe Miner) Poll 2 October 18 after VP and 2nd Debate (by /dev/ who has no appreciation for transparency being the secretive corrupt man he is so mere numbers) Will win Obama (14 votes [50.00%]) Romney (14 votes [50.00%]) Want to win Romney (22 votes [78.57%]) Obama (6 votes [21.43%]) Most recent poll before this Nov. 2nd also /dev/ who once again does not believe in open polls b/c he is clearly communist so no names Will win Romney (19 votes [63.33%]) Obama (11 votes [36.67%]) Popular vote Romney (23 votes [76.67%]) Obama (7 votes [23.33%]) Will it go to courts? Yes (11 votes [36.67%]) No (19 votes [63.33%]) Also be sure to update your electoral college prediction thread if you are not a loser and only have an ipad and can't use flash.

The last in the long line of highly scientific and accurate PPP polls to decide the fate the free world. Go

Surprisingly quite the ground game where I live in Florida. Many Obama people going around. A few Romney folk as well but honestly where I live in Fla will go Romney whether or not he wins the state....I think Obama is out to lower the margin up here so South Florida can carry him more easily if this is even a possibility (which it probably isn't).

I'm throwing CO into Obama corner last minute :Romney: Fla, Va, NC Obama: Co, IA, WI, MI, OH, PA, NV, NH http://www.270towin.....php?mapid=bovO 290-248 Obama

No interest in that sprt of thing. I've seem some forum speeches from both Bush and Clinton fairly recently where they aren't campaigning and just talk about whatever...those were good. Bush is hilarious.

T-Dog and Lori bite it in a zombie assault is pretty brutal.

!@#$ing christ tonight was just brutal

Haha seriously. It's pathetic honestly some of the posts on this board that paint the picture of the fictional democratic candidate supporter in any given election as nothing but minority, welfare, moochers. In any event, these people are idiots, threatening to riot. No more idiotic than the the other idiots who threatened civil war if Obama wins again. idiots are idiots EDIT: although I will admit it's is more badass to threaten civil war than riot

b/c we are the ****ty Bills and they are the 7-1 Texans

IF we were lucky and stayed healthy and caught breaks along the way and it was a typical year where 9 wins gets you in as that last ****ty wildcard team who gets beat right away...yes...it is conceivable that Fitz could lead us to that at best case scenario. That is basically the argument for Fitz. Also the offense is just built around what Fitz can do, there is no actual reason other than "we can't do it" that we don't have a more attacking passing game. In fact, if our WRs, crap as they may be, could take advantage of the field a little more and make the D fear a deep threat...they would play better especially Stevie and hopefully TJ. Also, w/ a bigger stronger QB Chandler would do much better. Bottom line, it's been over for quite some time. I will be absolutely disgusted if Fitz starts week 1 next year.

Congrats TC welcome to the club. Honestly it's not bad, it's actually nice after a while to be a numb bills fan. Just watch the game, see who plays well don't worry about winning or who plays bad, and enjoy the rest of the league. If you have something else to do, you can just go do it also. This is the way, the brave new way. Actually it's just the old way coming back, but it's better than what most of us were doing the first few games.

This topic is true. We do indeed have a QB that cannot make all the throws that must be made.

http://www.guardian....nium-enrichment Iran's state media has denied reports that Tehran had suspended the enrichment of uranium at 20% in a goodwill gesture ahead of talks with the world's major powers. "Twenty percent uranium enrichment activities continue as before and no change has happened," the semi-official Fars news agency quoted an unnamed source as saying on Sunday. On Saturday night, Iranian MP Mohammad Hassan Asafari was misquoted by opposition websites and the Saudi-owned al-Arabiya as saying that Tehran had already stopped 20% enrichment. Asafari had only signalled in his comments to Iran's Isna news agency that Iran would be ready to temporarily stop enrichment to 20% if sanctions were lifted. Asafari on Sunday stepped forward to clarify. "The 20% enrichment has not been and will not be halted in Iran," he insisted, according to the website of the state's English-language television, Press TV. Asafari is a member of the parliamentary committee on national security and foreign policy. "Yet … as announced previously, Tehran is ready to temporarily supply its need for 20%-enriched uranium for its 5-megawatt Tehran [Research] Reactor from abroad if the sanctions are lifted," he said. • This article was corrected on 4 November 2012. An earlier version of this story ran with the headline "Iran suspends uranium enrichment" based on Asafari's quotes as reported by al-Arabiya. Sanctions exacerbate Iranian political strife: http://www.telegraph...c-policies.html Ahmadinejad's conservative rivals in the 290-seat assembly have harshly criticised his handling of an economic crisis that they blame as much on his mismanagement as on Western sanctions aimed at derailing Iran's disputed nuclear programme. Economic problems have seen the Iranian rial plummet and oil exports dwindle, exacerbating divisions within Iran's factionalised political system, despite calls from Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei for officials to stop bickering. Last week, Khamenei renewed his demands for unity, saying public infighting amounted to a betrayal of the country. But the stern warning from Iran's most powerful leader has not stopped MPs hostile to Ahmadinejad from pressing ahead with a plan to question him publicly for a second time. On Sunday, according to a statement read in Parliament and printed by the parliamentary news agency, legislators said they planned to question Ahmadinejad on his administration's economic policies. Questions would focus on its response to the rial's fluctuations and what they said was the mistaken allocation of limited government-subsidised dollars, including for the import of thousands of foreign cars. The petition was signed by 77 MPs, Iranian news agencies reported, and will be delivered to the president later on Sunday. Ahmadinejad has one month to answer parliament's questions. If he ignores the summons or attends the session but fails to convince his questioners, parliament could try to impeach him. By law, Ahmadinejad is not allowed to run in a June presidential election, but there has been speculation he will try to extend his influence by backing a favoured candidate. The public questioning could be an attempt by rivals to weaken his standing ahead of the vote. Ahmadinejad has indicated he will use any public questioning to reveal "unspoken" facts that he has until now kept secret, Iranian legislator Hossein Ali Haji Deligani told the Mehr news agency in October. Deligani said that in a meeting with parliamentarians "Ahmadinejad was not at all worried or concerned about a public questioning of the president, and announced, 'I see the questioning of the president as an opportunity to state the unspoken in parliament,'" according to Mehr. In March, Ahmadinejad became the first president in the history of the Islamic Republic to be called before the legislature. During an hour-long session, he responded in a confident and flippant tone at times to questions about his economic record and his allegiance to Khamenei. In recent weeks, he has fired back at the judiciary and legislature, bringing into full public view a feud between himself and the powerful Larijani brothers, who include Ali, the parliament speaker, and Sadeq, the judiciary chief. In a letter to Sadeq Larijani published in October, Ahmadinejad said the judiciary had unjustly imprisoned his top press aide and that it was acting outside the bounds of Iran's constitution.