-
Posts
5,944 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by CountDorkula
-
-
18 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said:
Sweet
Apparently everyone on Twitter is a wind expert now.
-
30 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said:
Reid Ferguson said yesterday he didn’t think it would take long for a new punter to get acclimated. Not sure if he’s just being optimistic but he seemed confident.
Catch snap, kick ball.
Not like its a O or D player who has to learn play calls.
-
1 minute ago, 4merper4mer said:
Although I agree with your overall assessment of both attorneys, this lawyer did later correct himself claiming he misunderstood the “before the draft” portion of the question.
I mean the questions was very clear and he answered with an Emphatic "You better believe he did"
Me thinks he just got caught and had to walk it back.
-
1 minute ago, SoCal Deek said:
And in the meantime he’s going to work at the local car wash? It’ll be interesting to see how long the love for his ‘family’ lasts. 😉
He's made 20 million dollars in the last 13 years. I think he'll be okay.
-
1
-
-
10 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:
Nobody was criticising Beane at the macro scale. But him having to admit he screwed the pooch on the person evaluation as much as the talent evaluation on Ford, then the Araiza situation, then having to cut a guy he gave a pretty guaranteed FA deal to 5 months ago (including a dummy year to kick some cap dollars) is a bad week by anyone's standards. It is arguably his worst week as a Bills GM.
He has had more than enough good weeks to compensate it and many very good weeks, but nobody is nitpicking here. People were just pointing out a fact - the last week has been a bad one for Brandon Beane - he himself would acknowledge that, I guarantee you - and some fans are too sensitive to hear that.
Nobody is saying Beane sucks or Beane should be on the hotseat or Beane is a disaster. It started in the cuts thread as a very simple statement "Beane has taken a few Ls recently." That should not be a controversial statement. It is a matter of fact that he would agree with. I still don't want to swap him for someone else.
Yea but you know this board. Any criticism is not allowed.
Or if you do criticize people turn it into threads/posts like this.
I guarantee you if you asked Beane describe your last week, he'd probably say one he'd like to forget.
-
3
-
3
-
-
2 minutes ago, marck said:
Please mods close this topic
SO yo had to click on this topic, go to the last page and then post this message.
You could have also just not have clicked on the link to open this topic, but here we are.
AKA "LAMP LAMP LAMP"
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, PromoTheRobot said:
How much evidence became inadmissible thanks to the "Clarence Darrow of Twitter" Dan Galleon?
I think it might be the other way. Arazia Lawyer can not now claim that any of this information is "Privilege" because its all public.
-
5 minutes ago, Forlorn hope said:
Matt arazia was released because 48 hours ago he became a legal liability. How and when a corporate body weighs what legal vulnerabilities are acceptable depends on a multitude of factors.
Yes some of the journalist questions were from a political persuasion and extremely stupid and or sensational in trying to create institutionalized momenteum against due process ( from a legal standpoint and cultural standpoint.)
It's been discussed ad nauseam this is already gaining traction in university in order to create less individual rights and civil rights in order for a centralized state to accuse you of anything and everything without being able to create legal recourse. Think tanks, university, media have all centered on this. This is the whole point of " believe all women" saga.
So when a crisis like this happens, as Marxists revolutionaries always do, they don't let it go to waste.
These ppl don't look at it as a human issue or search for the Truth. It's how can I take advantage of this crisis to create political power. The ends justify the means
{insert Billy Madison clip}
-
So just so I’m clear, female media members and Marxism are to blame for Matt Araiza being released.
seems reasonable enough
-
1
-
-
2 minutes ago, Since1981 said:
employers and mine can fire me for any reason other than race sex color religion. It’s the correct move here for his employer and the organization.
(P.S. SDPD, eeek, slow but that’s another matter)
but I was told earlier that Arazia could sue the Bills if they cut him.
-
Just now, GoBills808 said:
Again, I don't need the courts to decide how I should feel about something.
remember that time a drunken lawyer hit and kiled a girl, went home and tired to hide the evidence was found not guilty.
The court decided he wasn't guilty, so now im cool with that whole situation.
-
Just now, ExiledInIllinois said:
What if the court finds him innocent. Will the moral do-gooders accept it.
The road to perdition is paved with good intentions.
DeShaun Watson was also found innocent.......... so.........
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, Kellyhero68 said:
Some interesting questions,
1. She spoke to the police who conducted an investigation in October but did not press criminal charges YET.
2. The police did a forensic examination for rape in October. If his DNA was found wouldn't he have been arrested last year?
3. She wrote about it in her journal, which the police were not interested in. And his name is never mentioned.
4. We only heard about this AFTER he made the 53-man roster.
5. She admitted being drunk, semi unconscious, and face down but seems to remember him by name.
I am saying he is guilty or innocent, but these questions need to answered before anyone passes judgement.
its kind of sounds like you are.......
-
Just now, Buffalo716 said:
I stand for the truth… If he’s guilty he should be held accountable
but Just because he didn’t have high draft stock didn’t mean he didn’t have an NFL future… He absolutely was the most high profile of the players named… And he had an NFL future
Something none of the other players named had a chance of
yet they are still named in the lawsuit no?
Lets ask rape victims if money just magically makes the torture go away.
-
Just now, TampaBillsJunkie said:
May or not be, but the team already made up its mind. He is on record saying there was mutual consent, but she's a minor so that's no good either.
The Bills are not the law, they do not need to prove innocence or guilt, they need to care on if having him on this team is worth the circus this will bring over the next months.
they decided its not worth the risk
-
Just now, UKBillFan said:
Allegedy. So many in this thread have decided he is guilty.
I haven't seen that, I've seen most saying cut him and move on, its not worth having him on this team right now.
If he was to be found guilty and was still on this team, the Bills are in a much worse position. Risk i not worth it.
This is not a two weeks and its over. This is going to be a several month process.
-
1 minute ago, jkirchofer said:
When will you get it was never about the money. It's about holding someone with privilege accountable when the justice system fails.
He's a football player, obviously its only about the money. {Rolls eyes}
He was a college senior with little draft stock when the first movements were filed, so it debunks the whole damn thing.
-
1 minute ago, mannc said:
Well, looks like Dan Gilleon accomplished his goal...now his client gets to sue and try to collect from an unemployed 22-year old...
Yea, cause that's what matters in all of this.
-
1 minute ago, stevewin said:
Thats a nice bit of legwork/reporting by TG
TG is the best reporter we have.
plus he’s not an insufferable *****.
-
1
-
1
-
-
1 minute ago, Alphadawg7 said:
Thats a bit dramatic lol. I mean a 17 year old hooked up with a college kid, happens every day in every state in this country. Of all the things with this case, this is the least of the concerns. Not like he was 35 years old or something here. Not to mention, there are sworn statements from eyewitnesses stating she said she was 18 and went the local college that had the same name as her HS.
I agree with this people need to really stop focusing on the age part of this and more focus on the forceable sex rape and gang rape allegations
-
2
-
-
1 minute ago, BeastMaster said:
But according to his lawyers investigators...she was telling people she was 18 YO.
That changes things...but you can still go ahead and make bolded posts and be outraged if you like.
And according to Araiza he doesn’t remember anything about that night so he wouldn’t have known she was saying she was 18…..
-
2 minutes ago, YoloinOhio said:
It is because, as he said, they learned more in the 24 hours leading up to the game than they knew previously. That’s why he was in Carolina, expecting to play, and no other punter on the roster. It was a last minute decision to not play him. That’s why McD couldn’t sleep. It was the details in the civil suit that they didn’t have until Thursday evening
I find it highly coincidental that a team that had won 10 straight preseason games wasn’t even competitive in this one and got shut out by Panthers back ups. Coupling that with the McDermott press conference something doesn’t sit right.
-
1
-
-
2 minutes ago, BeastMaster said:
So if he had sex with a drunk girl (typical college experience) and she then goes on to later go in a house and get attacked, this is a position that none of us could be put into?
Well considering there are thousands of members on this site and not one of them has come forward to say I was wrongly accused of something very similar to this I’d say it’s a pretty safe no
-
2 minutes ago, hondo in seattle said:
I don't know this young lady but Brian Bank's false accuser didn't shy away from the scrutiny.
Maybe 90% of rape allegations are true but not all are. Araiza's lawyer says it's a money-grab. Maybe so, maybe not. I'd love to see what the police have.
With all due respect to his lawyer, law 101 is never admit guilt. Also it is his job now as his lawyer to drag this girl’s name through the mud as much as he can to prove his innocence
-
1
-
Matt Araiza accused of rape, served with a lawsuit.
in Off the Wall
Posted
SO are you on other chat boards or social media platforms trying to unwind the facts of other sexual misconduct and rape cases, or only this one?