Jump to content

CountDorkula

Community Member
  • Posts

    5,907
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by CountDorkula

  1. 23 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said:

    Hammer said it looks favorable for the game.  He said he can't rule out a shower at 5:00 but it should clear out well before the game....clouds moving pretty quickly.

     

     

    For anyone around the Stadium in the last hour, holy hell was that a storm.  Multiple lightning strikes in a row.

     

    One had me covering in my chair just as natural reaction.

     

    It lit up my house and the thunder was instant and insane. 

    • Like (+1) 1
  2. 18 minutes ago, Buddo said:

    More than just Evans and Lattimore should get some grief for the whole thing.

     

    Lattimore and quite possibly another saints defender, have a chirp at Brady in passing. Brady fires back, but also advances on Lattimore aggressively, who holds his ground.

     

    Fournette then shoves Lattimore, who pushes him back, but with his hands partly on Fournettes helmet - probably why he got ejected.

     

    Evans then blindsides Lattimore, and all hell breaks loose.

     

    Evans should get a suspension, imho. If he does, they probably suspend Lattimore also, for their 'bad blood'.

     

    I think that's unfair. For all that Lattimore may well be something of a catalyst, he's not the guy dishing out blindside hits, after the whistle has gone.

     

    Brady and Fournette should also face punishment, imho - although I see that as just fines.

     

    Brady could have easily chirped back while still walking away, and that would likely have been the end of it.

     

    Fournette was the guy who first got physical in the situation, so bears a deal of responsibilty also.

     

    There's also another Saints defender who got physically involved early, and he probably deserves to be fined also.

    Josh Allen does this, do you think he should face punishment?

  3. 46 minutes ago, Buffalo_Stampede said:

    Which weakens your highest paid players on offense. It’s just a fact. Last year’s Buffalo weather was probably the worst weather I can remember. I don’t think it’ll be that bad every year but when you have a $40+ million  QB and $20+ million WR you want to see them do what they do best. It’s not hand off and block.

     

    The Bills lost the number 1 seed because of weather.

     

    End of rant. 

  4. 1 minute ago, Mr. WEO said:

     

     

    I just said that.  So weaker teams need to plan to use it to their advantage (see:  Bills v NE 2021).  The wind equalized the offenses by taking away the passing advantage of the Bills.

     

     

    "The Elements in Buffalo favor the Bills though"- Every Bills fan. 

    • Haha (+1) 2
  5. 14 minutes ago, LeGOATski said:

    Football is an outdoor sport. Stop sterilizing the game. It's not about being tough for the fans. The elements are supposed to be a factor and that's part of what makes the game interesting. But so many fans aren't interested unless the score is 45-38 or whatever.

    Is that why every major game from college on is played in either a dome or warm weather state?

     

    Fans want elements. Players don't.

     

    Elements cause additional risk for injury for players.

     

     

    48 minutes ago, Rampage said:

    We’re close to being one day closer

    we must be very, VERY close now. 

    • Disagree 1
  6. 1 hour ago, ArdmoreRyno said:

    Wings at BWW in Sherman, Texas are $14 for 10. 

     

    And they are trash. I actually ordered wings from Chili's in Ada, Oklahoma a few months ago and almost threw up. 

     

    Just can't get good wings around here. 

    I was in Flagstaff Aizona and saw a "Best wings in town" sign so I pulled in.

     

    Place was packed, worst wings I've ever had in my life. Size of my pinky and my teeth bounced off the rubbery meat as I tried to eat them. Asked for my check and left. 

  7. Just now, extrahammer said:

     

    SO you're more righteous because you shame people for pointing out facts? Come on... 

    im not saying that at all.

     

    I'm saying people are more invested in trying to prove this case one way or another because the guy was a Bills player. It probabyl came out wrong. 

    Just now, Bandito said:

    Wait for all facts to come out before casting an opinion on those types of things. With that being said in the US you are innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. These cases are very hard to determine what actually happened.

    agreed, my comment wasnt an attack on you, its just people are more trying to prove guilty or not because the dude was a Bills player.

     

     

  8. 29 minutes ago, Bandito said:

    Not really. Facts are still coming out. Some of us still believe in the rule of law and innocent until proven guilty in a court of law, not the court of social media/twitter etc

    SO are you on other chat boards or social media platforms trying to unwind the facts of other sexual misconduct and rape cases, or only this one?

  9. 1 minute ago, 4merper4mer said:

    Although I agree with your overall assessment of both attorneys, this lawyer did later correct himself claiming he misunderstood the “before the draft” portion of the question. 

    I mean the questions was very clear and he answered with an Emphatic "You better believe he did"

     

    Me thinks he just got caught and had to walk it back. 

  10. 10 minutes ago, GunnerBill said:

     

    Nobody was criticising Beane at the macro scale. But him having to admit he screwed the pooch on the person evaluation as much as the talent evaluation on Ford, then the Araiza situation, then having to cut a guy he gave a pretty guaranteed FA deal to 5 months ago (including a dummy year to kick some cap dollars) is a bad week by anyone's standards. It is arguably his worst week as a Bills GM. 

     

    He has had more than enough good weeks to compensate it and many very good weeks, but nobody is nitpicking here. People were just pointing out a fact - the last week has been a bad one for Brandon Beane - he himself would acknowledge that, I guarantee you - and some fans are too sensitive to hear that. 

     

    Nobody is saying Beane sucks or Beane should be on the hotseat or Beane is a disaster. It started in the cuts thread as a very simple statement "Beane has taken a few Ls recently." That should not be a controversial statement. It is a matter of fact that he would agree with. I still don't want to swap him for someone else. 

    Yea but you know this board. Any criticism is not allowed.

    Or if you do criticize people turn it into threads/posts like this.

     

    I guarantee you if you asked Beane describe your last week, he'd probably say one he'd like to forget. 

    • Like (+1) 3
    • Agree 3
  11. 5 minutes ago, Forlorn hope said:

    Matt arazia was released because 48 hours ago he became a legal liability. How and when a corporate body weighs what legal vulnerabilities are acceptable depends on a multitude of factors. 

     

    Yes some of the journalist questions were from a political persuasion and extremely stupid and or sensational in trying to create institutionalized momenteum against due process ( from a legal standpoint and cultural standpoint.)

     

    It's been discussed ad nauseam this is already gaining traction in university in order to create less individual rights and civil rights in order for a centralized state to accuse you of anything and everything without being able to create legal recourse. Think tanks, university, media have all centered on this. This is the whole point of " believe all women" saga. 

     

    So when a crisis like this happens, as Marxists revolutionaries always do, they don't let it go to waste. 

     

    These ppl don't look at it as a human issue or search for the Truth. It's how can I take advantage of this crisis to create political power. The ends justify the means

     

     

    {insert Billy Madison clip} 

×
×
  • Create New...