Not at all, was just more of a testament to how yahoo has done a good job of keeping people coming back to their site. I know yahoo is still a top 5 search engine but has fallen a few pegs over the last decade. I think fantasy football aspect has kept them in the game is all.
I play in one fantasy league at work every few years, nothing against fantasy fb at all but not my cup of tea, but just think it's funny that yahoo is still the main one that everyone uses.
I went 1 loss in each qtr of the season with game 17 being a toss up if the Bills are fighting for home field or not (which I'm hoping they already clinched).
12-5.
I think it's only illegal if he's under contract with another team.
Say the Bills told obj that they were interested in him while he was under contract with LA, that's what the tampering rule covers.
Telling a FA they are interested in him sticking around is the same as Beane calling me up and saying they are interested in me sticking around.
I understand what you are saying but it's more of a "playing the odds" type of deal when you make your roster instead of looking at it as "well, he's better so we keep him and cut him because he can back up 2 skill positions if they both get hurt at the same time"
The likelihood you need him vs not needing him is tipped toward not needing him. *knocks on forest*
That's the case for most teams when they lose skill position players.
Hodgins at 5 or 6 needed to prove he was an asset on ST. He didn't so kumerow got the spot.
I thought that was the earliest he would be able to come back if he was put on the 53 and then IR'd. I know if they IR him without putting him on the 53 he's done for the year. Or I have everything messed up with IR.
I guess I don't see the purpose of this. Wouldn't an injury settlement cover it and just keep Jones or is he not eligible for it?
Would think they would want to keep Jones on ST for those first 6 games.
These numbers seam low to me.
2022 projection: 4,098 passing yards, 33 TDs, 13 INTs (678 yards/7 TDs rushing)
Hopefully the ints one is right though, or high.