Jump to content

NickelCity

Community Member
  • Posts

    6,184
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by NickelCity

  1. Honestly? That's not snark I'm just surprised by that. I haven't often heard him described as some sort of beefcastle but I don't see many people saying he's "slight". Obviously this is just my own experience.
  2. I've thought about this a little bit, and my own opinion is that limiting selections to players - especially qbs - who fit a certain mold is reducing your already minuscule chance of drafting a quarterback who will turn out adequate or better.
  3. I think the Broncos are going to get demolished, and I hope to God I'm wrong as hell.
  4. The Bills fan in me is glad for our own records. But I respect the Seahawks and often route for them.
  5. Let's all smoke some adhesive and oregano and call it synthetic weed.
  6. I'm not sold on Bradham at all. But we just need so many LBs...
  7. Makes losing Henderson a bit easier to take, though I'm still not happy about that.
  8. Not surprised by this at all.
  9. I like Kevin, he's always seemed like a nice guy in our limited interactions, and I wish him success in the NFL. He's played mostly well at Stanford. I worry about how his arm strength will translate to the pro-game, and I really don't like his release. I think he's improved his over the middle accuracy, but the long balls seem hit or miss, and the sideline outs take foreeever to get there. Not convinced about his going through all of his progressions on a frequent basis. Played behind our awesome OLines, and worry there could be some shellshock.
  10. I hope we're never on hard knocks, personally.
  11. Absurd. He is not unquestionably the best pro prospect. Lots of work he needs to do. A LOT.
  12. I put RT after LB and S, but it's a need to be sure.
  13. He does seem to be pushing for his boy quite a bit.
  14. EDIT: 26 beat me to it...(i posted the same image)
  15. I'm just worried about the sheer amount of starting LBs this team needs.
  16. I appreciate the time it took to write that up, but even with regression to the mean on D, I thought our offensive production (and the emergence of Taylor) warranted a better record and a shot at a wildcard. Upset that Rex couldn't/wouldn't adjust the D to fit personnel. Long, long wait to see if the players we get to fit his scheme make a difference. 9 months. Ugh.
  17. You don't like this move? I'm SHOCKED!
  18. Happy about this. I think he's been excellent bringing in talent.
  19. Don't know enough about them to evaluate them as prospects, but I wouldn't be mad at the type of player you're describing. This defense is screaming for one (or two).
  20. Just hours ago, in reference to Carson Wentz, you wrote: Now this thread. Epic stuff man, it must be the (almost) offseason around here!
  21. I don't think he wants to go anywhere. Either that or he's great at keeping it under wraps, because even off the cuff and away from reporters he indicates he wants to be at Stanford for a long time.
  22. I am a SF Giants fan and, to a lesser degree, the Warriors. I was elated by both, but to compare either to my Buffalo fandom would be ludicrous. Neither is in the same stratosphere.
×
×
  • Create New...