dubs

You beat me to it!

haha. None of this is true. None.

I gotta give credit to the Dems for this again. They have singe handedly exposed two professions as frauds: federally elected officials and the bureaucracy AND overeducated useless people kudos!! ? the longer this continues, the more people are waking up.

not that it matters, but Ivy League.

Lesson learned

thanks for demonstrating your lack of perspective. being critical of the size, scope, bloat, and corruption of the current federal government doesn’t mean that you’re advocating for no government. the choice isn’t between a federal government that is increasingly encroaching on liberty, funds the excessive lifestyles of unaccountable bureaucrats, breeds corruption because of the power and money that flows through it, and has shown time and time again how ineffective and unnecessary it is or anarchy.

If there is a positive to come out of this entire fiasco, it really shows how worthless and unnecessary the the majority of the federal elected official and government really is. At what point do the NPCs start to realize they don’t need most of government in their lives? But in reality, government needs The citizenry to fall in line and continue to pay for their useless existence

that’s not true. At best it’s unclear. There is precedent for impeachment of district judges for conduct before he was in office. If Dems thought they had him on that, we’d have seen this charade last year. Point is they don’t, and Tibs still can’t point to a single “crime” committed by this president. No one can.

what are you talking about? im entertaining your theories here. You’re not making any sense. The Dems are currently going through this impeachment inquiry about Ukraine. This Cohen fiasco happened last year. If what you’re saying Is true, why didn’t they just or don’t they just impeach on this obvious campaign finance crime (you’re words not mine)

Im just playing out Tibs logic. he said trump committed a crime via Michael Cohen, but he can’t be indicted in court. My question is then why don’t the Dems impeach based on the crimes Tibs is saying Trump committed?

What’s impeachment then? If he committed a crime, impeach. It’s really simple. Then when he’s out of office, indict.

You didn’t share a single crime of Trump. seriously, with all the scrutiny and vitriol from the Democrats, why haven’t they tried to impeach him based on Michael Cohen’s crimes, if what you say is true. Let me save you some time, the answer is because they can’t prove any crime that trump committed. DR has said it a thousand times, at least, and it’s true. You’ve dug in so hard on this that you’re blinded. I honestly don’t care very much about Donald Trump. What I do care about is the uncovering of how corrupt Washington DC is and it’s exposure to the citizens of this country. I’d feel the same way if Pete B or Obama or anyone exposed this. what we are seeing is how far the establishment will go to protect their own lives that’s funded by taxpayer dollars and brokered through influence peddling and lack of accountability.

hahaha. You are such a buffoon. Seriously, quit while you’re behind, way behind. Russian Collusion - FAIL Russian Investigation Obstruction - FAIL Campaign Finance Violations - FAIL Quid Pro Quo w/ Ukraine - FAIL Bribery - FAIL Extortion - FAIL I know I’m missing like 10 emergency breaking news walls are closing in scandals, but you get the point.

If you can make a compelling or even coherent argument that Trump is a criminal, I’d be all ears. Seriously. Pro tip: it helps to have actual evidence to reference to indicate guilt of said crime.

It’s truly amazing this is still going on. I’ll get the Dems credit for one thing, they absolutely do not quit.

seriously, prove it. I read the Axios debunked article and it was nothing but assumptions, and conjecture essentially based on the legal strategy of snark.

prove it

wait: axios said it was “debunked”. Nothing to see here I guess. ? Why it matters: Republicans are using a debunkedconspiracy theory that Ukraine meddled in the 2016 presidential election to justify President Trump's decision to freeze congressionally approved aid to the country.

ha. I agree. I think it means: Rong Time to Put A Balloon in this Game.

There is actually a really good article in the WSJ about the Ravens attack and how unique it is. It comes down to the options Jackson has on every play and how confusing it is for a defense to figure out who has the ball. first, their efficiency and effectiveness comes from their run game (obviously). But because they are in the pistol or shotgun 95% of the time, and each play has options, they can’t be defended by the traditional means (IMO). I think it all comes down to making Jackson think for a second before the decision. That might mean holding the line rather than rush up field at the snap. Clogging the middle (Hash to hash) of the field which makes the quickest decisions more difficult, and causes him to look to the sidelines more. The longer Jackson is indecisive for, the better for the defense.

possibly. I think you can still clog up lanes and create congestion and confusion. but again, this is just an amateur take on it. Not dying on this hill or anything.

I like that. Maybe get Luiget in there too. Johnson. Shaq: Luiget: Star: Philips: Oliver. White Hughes: Edmunds: Milano Hyde.

This could be totally stupid because I’m not an NFL defensive coordinator, but, here goes... Id clog the line and keep everyone in their lanes. I’m talking 4 or 5 linemen in the gaps, 2 or 3 LBs playing off the line and crashing, a safety in the middle and two DBs. The second it’s apparent it’s not a run, drop the LBs, a lineman, and clog up the middle passing lanes. Make Jackson stay and throw to the sidelines or in really tight windows.

You never know. I still don’t think Jackson is a good passer. I think defenses just haven’t figured out a way to make him one dimensional. Granted, that’s a really tall task and no suggesting it’s easy. It’s not, no one has done it yet. But I think that possibility is out there.

Going to be a tough game. Defense’s toughest test yet. I still think there is a way to shut the ravens down, similar to the Playoffs last year. Just not sure how.