All_Pro_Bills

Another serious terror threat averted by quick thinking and aggressive police work.

Or making you're own pipe out of spare household items? Tin foil, an empty toilet paper roll, and some tape might work. These drug giveaway programs simply do nothing to cultivate innovation and creativity skills and thinking. Although they do eventually kill a lot of people.

Its like I've concluded the reason we have so many laws is because we have so many lawyers. Collectively working to make life more litigious to facilitate full employment for their compatriots.

All these governments run their undercover teams through the same training and education curriculum. The main objective is to alter and modify consensus public opinion in their favor and eliminate or minimize public support for the protesters or their grievances. The media can bombard the public with images of violence and threats to public safety. They need to drill it into their heads that the government's main concern is the safety of the average citizen. Which is hysterically funny! That way when they move in with violence to crush the "terrorists" the public is okay with the idea. But the goons in Ottawa aren't there yet. They need to incite or manufacture some violent acts by the truckers. Storming Parliament? That sounds like the current go-to move. Like you said storming the seat of government power sounds familiar but I'm just not quite sure exactly where we've seen this recently! But I do recall the Reichstag fire. That worked out pretty well for the ruling party but not so much for everybody else.

The lefties that followed her into the restroom last year are alleging she didn't wash her hands properly. Which is a violation of bathroom etiquette not to mention COVID safety procedure. Her careless behavior is putting people in danger and demonstrates radicalized thinking. Not to mention her complete disregard for their agenda and their inability to coerce her to submit to their ideology. And if that fails... did you know she's a racist?

And asking prospective candidates to submit a hair sample so he can perform the sniff test which candidates are required to "pass" in order to move forward to the next round of "qualification" assessments.

Me spinning? Okay then. Please point me to a source that might provide a listing of all the convictions for illegal activity in relation to contacts with foreign nationals and government agents during and after the 2016 presidential campaign. That should settle it.

Your reading comprehension must be off today. Please turn over all your Russian collusion evidence to the DOJ today so they can initiate prosecution of crimes. Because for some reason after 5 years of investigation and accusations they don't seem to have anything solid for indictments and charges. That's not what happened. You're misinterpreting history. The bolded statement above is pure conjecture. As no U.S. law enforcement or intelligence agency, such as the FBI, was granted access to the servers by DNC officials and there was never any evidence or conclusions from law enforcement about how the e-mails were hacked or download or copied along with who had perpetrated the actions. So saying Russians gave it to Wiki is one possibility but that unverified. Another is somebody on the inside downloaded or transferred the files and then provided them to Wikileaks. How those e-mails found their way off the DNC servers and into the hands of Wikileaks has never been factually verified.

Only under very specific circumstances would I expect Russia to invade Ukraine and right now I don't see those circumstances being present. The only party sounding the alarm here is the Biden Administration. Statements from officials in France, Germany, and even Ukraine express little concern for an eminent invasion. Watching ABC World News Tonight you'd be led to believe its going to happen at any moment. My read of Putin and an examination of Russian ambitions is he has two strategic objectives here. 1) Integrate Russia economically with Europe, specifically closer ties with Germany and 2) systemically eliminate U.S. influence in the Middle East. Both of these goals, pushing the U.S. out of specific spheres of influence in place since the end of world war 2, are supported by efforts already in motion, for example NordStream2 and OPEC+. Middle East relations with Iran, Saudi Arabia, Syria, etc. Neither objective stands to benefit by moving aggressively to attack Ukraine. In short, I think Ukraine is just a diversion. This is nothing more complicated than a game of Empire. Russia wants to extend their influence, the U.S. wants to contain them and maintain the current arrangements. And while we tussle with Russia, China is quietly and discreetly extending their influence everywhere. Essentially taking over and colonizing big swatches of Africa and extending their influence in other places like South America, the Middle East, and Greater Asia in search of procuring markets and securing resources. While we focus on sideshows like Ukraine. If we want to win this game there needs to be some focus on critical and key interests and not a reflex action to engage in every little dust-up around the planet.

I thought I was pretty clear. Its DOA. Nobody cares about fake collusion stories at this point. Is that clear enough?

You're right. Why do people persist in pushing these conspiracies? Such as a crackpot conspiracy accusing a 2016 Presidential election campaign of colluding with Russia to steal the election from one of the worst Presidential candidates ever nominated by a political party that still has faithful believers after 5 years of no proof of anything.

The mistake of the left is getting between parents and their children and thinking they have some "right" to dictate to them what their kids should be learning. It's a fight they're not going to win. Want to test the theory. Go out into the woods and try hugging those cute little baby cub bears. And see what mama bear does next.

Pure self-interest. They all had a vested interest in maintaining the system. What did you expect they'd be saying? Why do people that know much of the governments COVID narrative is false go along with it?

https://babylonbee.com/news/trudeau-orders-all-geese-rounded-up-and-shot-for-honking-in-solidarity-with-truckers https://babylonbee.com/news/4d-chess-truckers-loot-nike-stores-burn-some-cop-cars-so-gofundme-will-reinstate-them

What the simple minded don't understand about the cigarette example is history shows the people supporting the smoking is safe narrative was the establishment, big government, big tobacco, federal and state regulators. All working to protect the industry from harm. They all knew it was harmful but as they were all riding the gravy train (Pink Floyd reference) they were more than happy to play along. The people that brought the truth to light were whistleblowers, independent researchers, medical doctors, public interest advocates, social justice advocates of the era, all bucking the system to expose the truth. And being subject to harassment and attacks on their personal and professional character. Sound familiar? Their actions are consistent with the current experts being branded as spreaders of "misinformation". And the current actions by big government and big pharma follow the tobacco industry and government complicity to a tee. What's more simple minded is casually dismissing and not taking their COVID concerns seriously because your belief and support of authority and the official narrative will not protect you from personal harm to your health if they're conclusions derived from experience and subject matter expertise are correct.

The key tactic for misinformation buffs is to avoid any discussion of details. Keep the conversation at the 40,000 foot level and don't get cornered into a discussion or debate of actual facts. I watched some of the local news at Noon today and their delivery of the story was flawless. They mentioned Rogan and misinformation on Spotify but the reporters couldn't articulate or cite a specific point of contention that was false. What these idiots don't seem to comprehend is that if they're vaccinated the concerns cited by experts impact them too. Believing and going along with the official narrative is not going to protect you from harm if the concerns of opposing experts turn out to be true. Maybe they should listen?

An anarchist attacking people protesting against government order. More like some guy that imagines himself to be an anarchist that in reality supports government authority which is in complete contradiction of the definition of an anarchist which requires a complete disdain for order and authority. I should have originally added that this is an example of the far-left's self-delusional ideology. They believe themselves to be revolutionaries fighting against some systemically oppressive establishment. Their moral and ethical beliefs represent the side of good and right, they are victims and champions of victims. What this self-delusion hides is the fact their views align almost perfectly with the views of the establishment and the authorities. And they control almost every social and political institution and organization they claim to be fighting. How can you be a revolutionary when everything you believe aligns with the best interests of the establishment and authorities in opposition to powerless individual citizens? .

Maybe Trudeau can call Biden and get some of our FBI guys to come up to Ottawa to stage something? Their LinkedIn profiles suggest they're really good at setting up things like kidnapping plots and insurrections.

There are other players that have contracts with cap saving potential. Mitch Morse 2022 cap hit 11.25M, dead cap hit 3.75M Jordan Poyer 2022 cap hit 10.7M, dead cap hit 3.6M (keep) Micah Hyde 2022 cap hit 10.2M, dead cap hit 5M (keep) Daryl Williams 2022 cap hit 9.925M, dead cap hit 3.6M Cole Beasley 2022 cap hit 7.6M, dead cap hit 1.5M AJ Klien 2022 cap hit 5.76M, dead cap hit .4M Jon Feliciano 2022 cap hit 4.97M, dead cap hit 1.5M Of course clearing that cap space would leave room to sign other free agents but also leaves some gaps in the line up. Or are there comparable players already on the roster for less money? And do you trust the Bills front office can fill these holes in the line up via the draft?

Well stated. Along with this you gotta be a mind blowing imbecile to defend the official narrative in light of conflicting information from experts in mRNA technology, virology and treatments, and the human immune system that propose that among other things the production of spike proteins can cause great harm to the human body up to killing you. Rather than demanding answers from officials along with insisting on an open dialogue on the risks and contentions of experts with a different view they decide its better to silence dissenters. Any way you want to shake it they're idiots.

Well, the Raiders are right there in town already. So out of police custody and off to the Raiders team facility.

Say what? The conversation is about what is factually wrong about statements concerning COVID made by Rogan's podcast guests. Which it appears is something you won't address.

Sure it is but I'm still waiting to hear what specifically is incorrect as nobody's proven anybody on Rogan's podcasts is spreading misinformation. Or debunked a single point made. I'd like to hear from scientist and researchers from the CDC, or the NIH, or Pfizer scientists before I'm ready to label any conclusions stated by his podcast guests as incorrect science. To date they haven't entered the conversation to dispute anything stated. What it comes down to is that an open and honest debate and discussion of the science, data, and expert views presented in a judgment free environment by a diversity of voices benefits us all. That's how progress is made and innovations are developed. By objectively looking at alternatives, debating and evaluating the merits of each alternative and choosing a course of action that's most effective. And it seems illogical to oppose those conversations assuming you have a genuine interest in the public good.

Perspective has nothing to do with it. What its about is facts and science presented in a court of law. Opponents of the cigarette industry assembled a fact-based and scientific case through the use of experts and discovery of the industry's records to prove in state and federal courts that smoking directly caused lung and other types of cancer and the industry knew of these effects. All through the use of due process through the legal and court system. To this point nobody has provided a single shred of evidence or refuted a single point presented by Rogan's guests concerning their expert conclusions concerning undisclosed dangers of mRNA vaccines and COVID in general. And what those dangers present to the public and the failure of government and the pharma industry to provide adequate disclosure of risks and acquire patient consent of those risks. What's missing from the argument here is that officials and others charging "misinformation" have proved nothing other than they're afraid to debate details. I've asked several times how anybody could know that guests like Dr. Malone are lying? I sure don't. What exactly they're lying about and what knowledge or expertise anyone might have in order to "know" they're lying? So I'm calling on any expert virologists, immunologists, vaccine experts, or nRNA technology, or Gene Therapy experts on the board to provide some insights. Or is the entire misinformation case depending on Harry and Meghan to provide expert medical advice?

Rogan's "crime" is that he provided a huge audience to experts the State has made great efforts to silence regarding COVID. They've been very successful marginalizing and punishing descent. While they bombard the public with get your shots public service announcements through the media 24/7. Some of Rogan's guests lately have challenged sacred narratives by providing their views on the safety and efficacy of vaccines that cite specific dangers they suggest the government and pharma companies have failed to disclose and may be hiding from the public. Nothing is more dangerous to authority than some expert challenging their edicts and their "right" to push everybody around. And as a result Joe's podcast, which authorities have to this point tolerated has crossed the line and is now viewed as dangerous to the establishment. So now he's spreading the dreaded "misinformation". And in the name of public safety these dangerous ideas must be suppressed. Because they're killing people. So he has to be forced through whatever means are necessary to stop. But here's the thing. The government and pharma are afraid. They're acting out of fear rather than any genuine concern for public safety. It's their safety that's the concern. Are Rogan's experts telling the truth and do they have all their facts straight? I don't know but I'd like to see some intelligent debate out in the open and I'd expect anyone else interested in knowing all the facts would too. A couple of Rogan's guests gave very detailed 3 hour long presentations filled with lots of facts, science, and statistics. But the officials shouting misinformation won't cite you one specific thing that is misinformation or incorrect. Just a blanket condemnation of their ideas. If they know the facts and the fact support the official narrative why don't they just say so? And go into all the details point by point and refute what these speakers have stated? Well, they're not going to engage in any public debate or counter any specific point of contention. Because they're afraid. Because once you get into the details their entire story could potentially fall apart and they can't risk that happening. So play the misinformation card, and if that fails see if they can brand him a racist. Wait and see.