Jump to content

billsfan714

Community Member
  • Posts

    3,237
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by billsfan714

  1. Lenny Bruce would get arrested in the 1960s for language.  Some people being offended by certain comedy is over 50 years old. it's nothing new.   I was in high school in the late 70s, Carlin got arrested for the 7 words you can't say on television routine.  Now people don't get arrested anymore, but like i said some people being offended is nothing new at all.   The more things change, the more they stay the same.  Some people were upset at Cheech and Chong for drug references in the 70's.  Glad I came up with guys like that and the GOAT--Richard Pryor.  Watch live in concert, still relevant today, came out in 1979.   The language never bothered me, funny is funny.

    • Thank you (+1) 1
  2. 17 hours ago, boyst said:

    Giselle bunchen is Also reportedly upset with the roast and how she was handled by the production/(unfunny) comics.

     

    Really, from clips I saw only Bledsoe roasted him truly, appropriately, and in the nature of a roast. A lot of the other schmucks went after everyone else but Tom. 

    After reading your posts, one question....have you ever seen a roast before?   Its what they do, they go after other people on the stage as well as the subject of the roast.  They get good jokes in but also say nice things about the person being roasted.   It's also for adults so there will be some swearing.   If that's not for you, that's fine, but maybe shouldn't opine on it.

    • Thank you (+1) 1
  3. I wonder how these trades score on the trade charts.   I thought the returns were also a little weak.  Like improving a 7th for a 7th seems like worth single digits on trade chart.  But i did see plenty of mocks with Adonai Miichell who is 6'2 and 205 and runs a 4.34 and hes still there.

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Agree 1
  4. 44 minutes ago, Albany,n.y. said:

    JP Losman was the result of Donahoe not having the guts to offer enough to get into the top 10 and draft the QB he really wanted, Ben Roethlisberger.  If Donahoe had offered enough to move up from 13, as Beane did later to move from 12 to 7, Bills history would be drastically different. 

    So, by including JP Losman, you are supporting trading up.  NOT trading up earlier in the draft was the problem, not the panic move for Losman when Donahoe lost out on Roethlisberger.   

    Here I thought we traded up for Losman and the number one the next year we traded away in the trade up could of been Aaron Rodgers.   Who I believe is still in the league.  

  5. Just now, dave mcbride said:

    Well, since you asked, in the 2019 postseason, he had 302 total yards in three playoff games and caught a bomb on KC's game winning drive (by beating Richard Sherman badly) that put the Chiefs in the red zone. He had 5 catches for 98 yards in the SB.

    Great drop the season totals on us.   

    • Eyeroll 1
  6. 5 minutes ago, Blackbeard said:

    He didn't have Allen tossing him the ball.

     

    But regardless, we have a generational talent at QB.  We won't see another QB of his skill in our lifetime on this team.  I think you have to gamble and go for it.  I'm all for trading up.  I think having Allen at QB calls for it.

    How did he do with Mahomes, Rodgers and Goff, not exactly stiffs there.  My point, Watkins was way overrated, and was a terrible trade up and it was in what was considered a good WR class.

  7. 15 hours ago, stevestojan said:

    The weirdest part about our modern conspiracy theorists is that they seemingly believe every conspiracy. It’s like they do it just to be argumentative. They’d likely get more traction with their whacked out ideas if they were a bit more selective. 

    Totally agree.   While there is nothing wrong with skepticism, that same skepticism should also be applied to the conspiracy theory and the motive of the people peddling it.   You will frequently find it's money.   Buy my book, watch my movie/documentary, buy my miracle cure, listen to my podcast, watch my youtube channel.    There's plenty of grift money to be made.   

    • Like (+1) 1
    • Agree 1
  8. The Kennedy assassination is the mother lode of conspiracy theories, and increased distrust in the government.   Depending on your bent, it was the CIA, the mafia, the KGB, the fatal shot was an accidental shooting from a secret service agent discharging his weapon from a car in the back of the motorcade.   I recently watched a documentary on amazon, where the gist of it was Kennedy faked his own death and put a squib (movie special effect for a gunshot) on his head and was living with Aristotle Onassis---that's why Jackie married him.   There's 5 right there.

  9. 23 minutes ago, GETTOTHE50 said:

    he doesnt leave any stone unturned and takes calculated shots/gambles.

     

    hes the best GM in bills history and i hope we never lose him.

     

    he has what it takes. hes one of the few surgeons of a GM in the league.

    Until he gets to one superbowl, let alone 4, no he's not.

  10. On 3/30/2024 at 7:29 PM, JerseyBills said:

     httpsnames://torotimes.com/posts/houston-texans-make-major-jump-in-stefon-diggs-next-team-odds-01ht5m9ag0r9

    So I would never say never but we all know there's pretty much no chance Stef is traded , unless it's an offer Beane just can't refuse, but what I find interesting here are the odds on where Diggs starts in 2024 and as a gambler I'm likely going to put my $ where my mouth is because these odds are great and it's easy easy $.

     

    From article - When DraftKings Sportsbook first released odds on Stefon Diggs’ next team in February, the Buffalo Bills were big favorites (-300) to retain the four-time Pro Bowl wide receiver while the Houston Texans were 10-to-1 to land to get him (or +1000).

     

    For non gamblers you'd need to spend 300 to win 100 on Diggs staying in Buf and spend 10$ to win 100 if he landed in Hou.. 

     

    Back to article - 

    There’s been a shift in those odds over the last month with Houston jumping up the board, though the odds are still projecting a return to Buffalo. By March 18, DraftKings’ new odds had Buffalo as the favorite (-230) and Houston up to +550 - again as the third-favorite - behind the Dallas Cowboys (+400).

    With the Cowboys being stagnant in free agency, they’ve dropped to +850 to land Diggs while Houston’s price has been bumped to +350 in the latest market shift. Those odds carry an implied probability of 22.22% that Houston would make a giant splash by giving quarterback C.J. Stroud an elite outside weapon next season. 

     

    So now, big difference , you can now spend only 230 to win 100 for Diggs staying in Buff and Hou dropped all the way to +350, 👀👀 meaning instead of winning 100$ on a 10$ bet , now , a 10$ bet will only win you 35$ if Diggs landed on Houston. That's a MASSIVE DIFFERENCE 

     

    Just caught my eye and very interesting to see the numbers move that significantly, especially towards Hou .  I know what I'm doing, I'm 100% putting 1150$ to win an easy 500$ on Diggs starting the season as a Buffalo Bill. Maybe much more. 

     

    Just wanted to give my gamblers an easyyyy money maker that is Bills related!🤑

     

    Edit- For the record I didn't put any $ on this but definitely would have at some point in off season. 

    Also, don't gamble unless you have a great system and are doing tons of research or if you follow someone that has a stellar betting record, they're rare but they do exist

    Obviously, you know what you're doing.  SMH

  11. 2 hours ago, Nephilim17 said:

    I don't think that's accurate by a long shot. Or, if it is, you have to look at NET difference which is we take on an extra 3 million but clear like 27 million next year.

    With a stud in the draft, I'll do that any day.

    Here's the numbers, its reality.

    DEADMoney.png

  12. I love how the Bills will contribute x amount for the stadium, when really it's the season ticket holders paying the PSL's that are paying that.   Its like when you go to a store and they ask if you want to contribute an amount to a charity.    Then the company will write a check. with their name on it, like they donated the money, when in reality it was all their customers and not the business donating that money.  

    • Agree 1
×
×
  • Create New...