aristocrat

Can you point to one post saying that we want him to go free? No you cannot. The juror should not have put this trial in jeopardy in the first place. There was plenty of evidence for Chauvin to be convicted. The person you should be upset with is the juror. The prosecution put together a case that a non biased jury would have convicted Chauvin. Now there is at the very least the apperance of improprietary in one of the more important trials in recent history. Now try and and form a response without making this about Trump.

Because this is literally the basis for our entire Judicial system. Two things can be true here....Chauvin murdered Floyd, and the trial might have been harmed by this juror. It is very important to get the conviction the correct way. Not by cheating or any other illegal way. They need to get it right. Has nothing to do with whatever side you are one and don't make it about that. You are arguing and name calling for the sake of doing it and purposely not even looking at what happened in the trial and that is shameful.

isn't that literaly what the democrats did with trump? so what exactly is the difference?

Just don' trade him to Miami. The Broncos could put something together around Chubb and some picks I'd imagine.

it's his only move. loses every argument. calls you a racist. he also will cut and paste part of a sentence you write to make you look racist.

The problem is either the Dems are incompetent with the border crisis or are causing the suffering down there on purpose. Having a border is something that is perfectly reasonable and is something the dems have long agreed with. The issue is they went so far against Trump the last four years the people coming to the border believe they can just come over and will have no issues. The problem is people die along the way and it's the weakest and most vulnerable who die...kids. Immigrion is perfectly fine when we do it legally and regulated. Especially during a pandemic when we don't know what strains of this virus could be headed are way.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/chauvin-juror-defends-participation-washington-230418703.html Mitchell said he answered “no” to two questions about demonstrations on the questionnaire sent out before jury selection. The first question asked: “Did you, or someone close to you, participate in any of the demonstrations or marches against police brutality that took place in Minneapolis after George Floyd’s death?” The second asked: “Other than what you have already described above, have you, or anyone close to you, participated in protests about police use of force or police brutality?” Such a high profile important case and it is starting to look lke he could get a new trial. This is so irresponsible on this guys part to throw a wrench into the trial. Plenty of evidence for there to have been a conviction.

This is the kind of stuff that leads to what Stalin did.

As I understand it she just got out of years in prison for tax fraud and then committed voter fraud while on probation for that crime. The more crimes you commit the harder your sentence usually becomes. The guy in the picture apparently had no criminal record. What a narrative though.

if he ran the 40 at 265 and hit 4.68 imagine if he lost that 20 pounds he put on he's probably under 4.5

You’re having a great day. Combo of sweat and jpg....sign me up

so he decided his sophomore year in high school he wanted to graduate high school early and then did so. impressive.

apparently his brother was born in buffalo and lived in buffalo during th 90s

tyreke had 172 yards against us in that title game. we could use a db that can cover him or another guy so we can lock down those chiefs and bucs wide receivers. if we can cover the wr's an extra second our d ends can get those coverage sacks.

This all could have been avoided by not drafting Love last year. They had other more important holes to fill and perhaps could have had the piece to beat the bucs.

again, you are changing narratives. desperately grasping at straws. that was not what we were talking about. i have debunked you at every point and you continue to just try and change narrative. we didnt invent slavery but we fought to end it. and end it we did. we ended jim crow. we've admitted interning the Japanese was wrong. kkk is barely even a thing anymore. i think at last count something like 29 total groups in the country and membership is in the thousands maybe but i cant really find info on membership. crack epidemic lead to your guy Biden passing some ***** laws and I am sad he was allowed to continue to have power in this country but we have a lot of people actively fighting him thank goodness. i dont know much about 4chan and others so cant really make an educated comment on it. rodney king, awful. Again, read my previous post again about things continuing to get better. I'll add. The entire world was a racist place when America began as the great experiment. The idea off all people being equal was the goal. It is impossible to have happened overnight but I wish it could have. You need to understand that the idea is to always work towards perfection but that it can't happen overnight. Wish it could but that's not reality. So your idea that we are a racist country is not factually correct.

Well if they did do it at their jobs it is pretty easy to spot and in this day and age of social media they ruin their careers pretty quickly with that stuff. So again your example is flawed. You make all these claims and have zero proof of it. You make up these hypothetical situations and proclaim them as indisputable fact when they are not. Just to be clear. Racism does exist. I am 100 percent against it. It is also ok that there continue to be less racist people in this country as time goes on. You probably need to hear that it's a great thing that it's happening and it is in fact happening. You can use history books as proof.

See you keep changing subjects here. You called it the underbelly of society or something these people that act racist in their basement but apparently normal during the day. Yes, of course if people in power act racist in public towards minorities and actively discriminate against them they are not treated equally. But you just used an example of Chauvin which was not considered a racist incident according to the DA. Again, not my words. So you used an example that was not racist.

hang on. you keep bouncing around from narrative to narrative. we were talking about the people who only did it in their basements. your words. in the words of the DA btw the Floyd killing was not a hate crime. not my words btw to be very clear as i know your next comment would be to call me a racist.

lol again, one time i misspelled it. spelled it correctly 100 other times. let it go it doesn't mean i am racist misspelling one time. is this person in power actively passing bills to hurt minorities?

hang on a second. you are the one who made the claim about the uncle in the basement or however you phrased it. the underbelly or however you said it. come on man keep up.

Hang on. Now you're changing the narrative. I know the game you're trying to play. It's very predicable.