damj Posted July 27, 2009 Posted July 27, 2009 No, he is vastly overrated as a QB ... contain him in the pocket and he is worthless.
Steely Dan Posted July 27, 2009 Posted July 27, 2009 Why start a poll saying "just vote yes or no" but put your own dumb reasons in the poll? Exactly what type of drama do PITA's bring? Beat me to it! Maybe he meant; People for the Intimate Treatment of Animals
Bufcomments Posted July 27, 2009 Author Posted July 27, 2009 Beat me to it! Maybe he meant; People for the Intimate Treatment of Animals And you would be correct sir.....
Bufcomments Posted August 2, 2009 Author Posted August 2, 2009 Results closer than I thought it would be...interesting but.... I was hoping more people would vote
Tcali Posted August 2, 2009 Posted August 2, 2009 A PETA backlash would only be good for the team, and the distraction would be minor. The reason we shouldn't sign Vick is because we have a better QB on the roster than a guy who hasn't played a down in years with a lifetime 75 QB rating. When we want to run the ball, we have three running backs to do that. we have no one who can run the ball as well as Vick though...with the poss exc of Leodis--and hes on the wrong side of the ball..
BillsWatch Posted August 2, 2009 Posted August 2, 2009 Who cares about PITA? Or his fans that word polls so it is caring about PITA or signing a QB who has not played a down in two years and wasn't effective at time as QB. Since you did not state as QB or not I voted yes - hire him to pick up after Buddy. If you want a true poll don't make editorial as part of poll.
Recommended Posts