BeastMode54 Posted March 24, 2009 Share Posted March 24, 2009 If Peters doesnt get a new deal and they trade him, Pettigrew might make more sense. We will need strong blocking and that is what he provides. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlbanyBill Posted March 24, 2009 Share Posted March 24, 2009 I used to be all about Pettigrew but I'm hoping we can fill other holes than TE first Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_ROOKIE_ Posted March 25, 2009 Share Posted March 25, 2009 I think we may draft this guy at #11 after hearing DJ at the coaches breakfast, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ans4e64 Posted March 25, 2009 Share Posted March 25, 2009 ya, but we'd have to give up at least a fourth, probably a third to get Scheffler. Â And that's a bad thing? Â Scheffler is a better TE than anyone sitting there in the 3rd and 4th rounds. If you're going to use one of your picks in rounds one to four on a TE, you might as well use your last one and save the earlier picks for the more pressing needs. Not to mention Scheffler is a proven NFL TE/receiving threat, as opposed to taking a chance on someone who's never played a down of NFL football and hoping he pans out. Â I'd gladly trade a 4th rounder for Scheffler. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted March 25, 2009 Author Share Posted March 25, 2009 And that's a bad thing? Scheffler is a better TE than anyone sitting there in the 3rd and 4th rounds. If you're going to use one of your picks in rounds one to four on a TE, you might as well use your last one and save the earlier picks for the more pressing needs. Not to mention Scheffler is a proven NFL TE/receiving threat, as opposed to taking a chance on someone who's never played a down of NFL football and hoping he pans out.  I'd gladly trade a 4th rounder for Scheffler. Did I say that?  maybe it would be a good idea to read the post that I responded to, then get back with me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ans4e64 Posted March 25, 2009 Share Posted March 25, 2009 Did I say that? maybe it would be a good idea to read the post that I responded to, then get back with me.  Yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted March 25, 2009 Author Share Posted March 25, 2009 Yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thewildrabbit Posted March 25, 2009 Share Posted March 25, 2009 ya, but we'd have to give up at least a fourth, probably a third to get Scheffler. The thing is, Scheffler gives the Bills that deep middle TE receiving threat that Jauron mentioned that the team needs. I'd be be thinking more of a great blocker then receiver at this point because the Bills don't have a dominating blocking TE atm.They really need to keep Edwards from getting killed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magox Posted March 25, 2009 Author Share Posted March 25, 2009 The thing is, Scheffler gives the Bills that deep middle TE receiving threat that Jauron mentioned that the team needs. I'd be be thinking more of a great blocker then receiver at this point because the Bills don't have a dominating blocking TE atm.They really need to keep Edwards from getting killed. I'm with you. I'd rather have a TE like Pettigrew who could help us both in the running and passing game. If we decide not to draft Pettigrew, then I wouldn't be opposed at all in trading a fourth round pick for a player like Scheffler. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
billnutinphoenix Posted March 25, 2009 Share Posted March 25, 2009 If he can start right away and be a factor, I'd pick him in a heartbeat... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts