JStranger76 Posted October 31, 2004 Share Posted October 31, 2004 I wonder if he will continue to get some reps at LG. I am happy that the coaches are at least trying new things. He may not be the long term answer, but with more experience you never know. In another post I said it is going to be very difficult to upgrade this line so I am all for trying out some experiments here ande there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fake-Fat Sunny Posted October 31, 2004 Share Posted October 31, 2004 The next thing is he is made an eligibler receiver and catches a TD pass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PromoTheRobot Posted October 31, 2004 Share Posted October 31, 2004 I wonder if he will continue to get some reps at LG. I am happy that the coaches are at least trying new things. He may not be the long term answer, but with more experience you never know. In another post I said it is going to be very difficult to upgrade this line so I am all for trying out some experiments here ande there. 93476[/snapback] How about Sam Adams on the goaline for the last TD? Movin' some meat! PTR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JStranger76 Posted October 31, 2004 Author Share Posted October 31, 2004 Whatever it takes man! A nice example of the new coaches not being bullheaded about their system. The coaching is better, it just doesn't show it in the teams record. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JAMIEBUF12 Posted October 31, 2004 Share Posted October 31, 2004 i was very pleasantly surprised to see justin in at offensive guard,also to see sam adams lining up at tight end!this seemed like the marv levy days where they would design plays for the personal at hand.what a concept!can you imagine greg williams doing stuff like this go bills! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rico Posted October 31, 2004 Share Posted October 31, 2004 I thought Bannan looked pretty good pulling on the run... with all the players ahead of him at DT, I say he should be converted permanently. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JAMIEBUF12 Posted October 31, 2004 Share Posted October 31, 2004 Whatever it takes man! A nice example of the new coaches not being bullheaded about their system. The coaching is better, it just doesn't show it in the teams record. 93490[/snapback] actually it does ,remember this is a rookie head coach,i bet mularky and the record gets better as the year goes on.as mularky sees how players respond to pressure and as mike gains expierience so go the bills! go bills Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JStranger76 Posted October 31, 2004 Author Share Posted October 31, 2004 Agreed Rico. We should probably extend Edwards and convert Bannan full time. Edwards is a good 3rd down DT in obvious passing situations. I thought he was making strides in this area last year before he tore his rotator cup. I don't think it's only that he is playing for a contract. He was already making strides before his injury. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wraith Posted November 1, 2004 Share Posted November 1, 2004 Agreed Rico. We should probably extend Edwards and convert Bannan full time. Edwards is a good 3rd down DT in obvious passing situations. I thought he was making strides in this area last year before he tore his rotator cup. I don't think it's only that he is playing for a contract. He was already making strides before his injury. 93619[/snapback] Edwards' contract has already been extended. Happened a few weeks back, before his elevated play of late. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JStranger76 Posted November 1, 2004 Author Share Posted November 1, 2004 Really? I didn't know that. If true that is good news. Where did you read it. I must have been drunk or something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JStranger76 Posted November 1, 2004 Author Share Posted November 1, 2004 Anyone have any details of Edwards contract extension? Years and $$$$???????? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fixxxer Posted November 1, 2004 Share Posted November 1, 2004 Anyone have any details of Edwards contract extension? Years and $$$$???????? 93680[/snapback] http://www.billsdaily.com/frontoffice/#contracts Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JStranger76 Posted November 1, 2004 Author Share Posted November 1, 2004 Yeah I checked that too but that is only his tender offer for THIS year. I guess Wraith just misunderstood it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JStranger76 Posted November 1, 2004 Author Share Posted November 1, 2004 I've checked Bills Daily, BB.com, and BillsZone and can't find anything on a Edwards contract extension, only his tender offer for only this year that he signed. Help me out Wraith, I gots ta know for sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
spidey Posted November 1, 2004 Share Posted November 1, 2004 I thought Bannan looked pretty good pulling on the run...with all the players ahead of him at DT, I say he should be converted permanently. 93562[/snapback] One other thing they ran well with him in and it was always him pulling and running to the right. They willl have to telegraph it less if its going to become a successful thing. At first we thought ref was nuts on false start penalty number 97 but than saw him trotting off the field. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted November 1, 2004 Share Posted November 1, 2004 Bellichick does this QUITE often for the Pats. W/ Seymour, T. Johnson, Bruschi, Klecko.... It's using simple leverage and big bodies. DTs/LBs are used to pushing forward so why not use that to your advantage on offense? Can also work to confuse the other team. Keep mixing it up, guys! (Altho the best substitution would be JP for Drew starting in the Rams game....). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts