Sisyphean Bills Posted November 28, 2008 Share Posted November 28, 2008 Scott is always makeing big plays. He can in no way shape or form to much worse than Ellison. I like it. Depth is the only concern. Sure. It's completely impossible. Of course, they might try to run right over his small a55 and have a 300+ lbs. lineman bury him until he's taken off on the back of a golf cart, but what the fug, right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thoner7 Posted November 28, 2008 Share Posted November 28, 2008 Sure. It's completely impossible. Of course, they might try to run right over his small a55 and have a 300+ lbs. lineman bury him until he's taken off on the back of a golf cart, but what the fug, right? Scott: Height: 6-1 Weight: 219 Keith Ellison: Height: 6-0 Weight: 229 10lbs is nothing when you taking on lineman, so dont give me that size crap. Ellison is too small, so replaceing him with someone who is too small is nothing new, not to mention Scott is much stronger at the point of attack (that means he takes on blockers better). Scott does not miss 2/3's of his tackles, is better in coverage, and makes plays behind the line of scrimmage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sisyphean Bills Posted November 29, 2008 Share Posted November 29, 2008 Giving up 50 pounds to a RB like this "small fry" is nothing. Gotcha. (Comparing a normal sized safety to a midget LB isn't so compelling.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Buffaloed in Pa Posted November 29, 2008 Share Posted November 29, 2008 Lehman is like a piece of glass. What a pick-up. Simeon Rice or Old man Lynch would have been better pick-ups. At least they will hit somebody. Not great pick-ups but better than Tin foil Teddy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keepthefaith Posted November 29, 2008 Share Posted November 29, 2008 Scott: Height: 6-1 Weight: 219 Keith Ellison: Height: 6-0 Weight: 229 10lbs is nothing when you taking on lineman, so dont give me that size crap. Ellison is too small, so replaceing him with someone who is too small is nothing new, not to mention Scott is much stronger at the point of attack (that means he takes on blockers better). Scott does not miss 2/3's of his tackles, is better in coverage, and makes plays behind the line of scrimmage. This is all a part of the Jauron master plan. Eventually he wants 11 DBs on defense. In addition to drafting so may DBs, he's moved Wilson from WR to Safety and is now moving DBs in to LB positions. He tried it with Wire last year, but he got away in free agency. Right now tricky Dick is looking for more offensive players to move to DB and plans to fill more LB spots and even D-line spots with DBs. Evidence of this is the weak pass rush that the Bills have and dropping D-lineman into coverage. Just all part of the master plan. You can't give up 31 points to a bad team even when your offense scores 54. Too risky and too stressful. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BillsVet Posted November 29, 2008 Share Posted November 29, 2008 This is all a part of the Jauron master plan. Eventually he wants 11 DBs on defense. In addition to drafting so may DBs, he's moved Wilson from WR to Safety and is now moving DBs in to LB positions. He tried it with Wire last year, but he got away in free agency. Right now tricky Dick is looking for more offensive players to move to DB and plans to fill more LB spots and even D-line spots with DBs. Evidence of this is the weak pass rush that the Bills have and dropping D-lineman into coverage. Just all part of the master plan. You can't give up 31 points to a bad team even when your offense scores 54. Too risky and too stressful. I can't help but remember before the 07 season when according to Peter King, Ralph asked Dick and Marv if they could stop the run. Even RW knew how important it was. We all know they couldn't do it in 06, then followed it up in 07 with another dreadful performance. Buffalo is 20th against the run, and having played SEA, JAC, OAK, STL, ARI (who doesn't have a good ground game) SD, MIA, NE (with a 3rd stringer) that looks even worse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts