Reed83HOF Posted November 21, 2006 Posted November 21, 2006 Very intersting article... How does JP compare I am surprised...
Rubes Posted November 21, 2006 Posted November 21, 2006 Stats are stats....but I was definitely surprised to see Kelly's QB rating in 1988. Thought it would be a whole lot better than 78....
fakeeyed Posted November 21, 2006 Posted November 21, 2006 yea, i just finished reading this before coming into TSW. pretty crazy, and i do like how the author stressed that we are a while off before jp is truly mentioned in the same breath as any of the qbs listed. suprisingly though, the kids numbers are pretty good.
Buffan00 Posted November 21, 2006 Posted November 21, 2006 Lets see how he does against a tough JAX defense! That would surely get noticed in weeks to come!
MartyBall4Buffalo Posted November 21, 2006 Posted November 21, 2006 Thats nice and everything. All I really care about is Wins losses and points. Losman trails the pack there. You can keep qb ratings.
Dan Posted November 21, 2006 Posted November 21, 2006 GuessWhozBack21 said: Thats nice and everything. All I really care about is Wins losses and points. Losman trails the pack there. You can keep qb ratings. 845033[/snapback] But, wins and losses are so much more dependent on the team as a whole. Now, I completely agree its important. But, if a QB is in a position like JP was on Sunday and continually throws ints. Then he's to blame. However, if we punt and the defense doesn't get us the ball back; can you really chalk that up to poor QB play. Yes, wins and losses are the most important stat. However, you can't really use them to judge a single player.
Recommended Posts