Draconator Posted September 2, 2006 Share Posted September 2, 2006 Considering that there is some fairly good competition for a limited number of spots, would there be an outside possibility that the Bills will only go with 2 QB's, thus allowing another spot to open up somewhere else? (RB, WR, etc.) If so, who goes? Holcomb or Nall? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
/dev/null Posted September 2, 2006 Share Posted September 2, 2006 Holcomb would be cut over Nall But it ain't gonna happen, we're keeping 3 QBs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pirate Angel Posted September 2, 2006 Share Posted September 2, 2006 Considering that there is some fairly good competition for a limited number of spots, would there be an outside possibility that the Bills will only go with 2 QB's, thus allowing another spot to open up somewhere else? (RB, WR, etc.) If so, who goes? Holcomb or Nall? 759611[/snapback] Holcomb has been bad this offseason, he makes our wide recievers useless because he cant throw the ball, Nall can do everything Holcomb can do plus throw the ball downfield, If we want a veteran backup we need one like Trent Dilfer, hes not the best QB in town but he plays smart and doesnt turn the ball over thats what we need. If you cant get a QB who can win games get one who wont lose them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shamrock Posted September 2, 2006 Share Posted September 2, 2006 Considering that there is some fairly good competition for a limited number of spots, would there be an outside possibility that the Bills will only go with 2 QB's, thus allowing another spot to open up somewhere else? (RB, WR, etc.) If so, who goes? Holcomb or Nall? 759611[/snapback] You don't want to be ringing Vinny come December. His retirement village is showing "Rudy" that month and there's no gurantee they'll release Vinny anyhow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts