MrLocke Posted April 26, 2006 Share Posted April 26, 2006 I know Peter Boulware has been a good player in the NFL, but why would anyone think that Wimbley can play after the huge busts Florida State has produced at defensive end? Andre Wadsworth- bust. Reinard Wilson- bust. Jamal Reynolds-bust. Why would Wimbley be any different from Wadsworth Wilson and Reynolds? Bobby Bowden must have some connections to get his guys drafted highly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BUFFALOTONE Posted April 26, 2006 Share Posted April 26, 2006 Because he is good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
socalfan Posted April 26, 2006 Share Posted April 26, 2006 Because they are thinking of playing him as an outside LB in the 3-4 defense. They think he can rush he passer from there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuckincincy Posted April 26, 2006 Share Posted April 26, 2006 I think it's because in the last few years, the so called "tweeners" - lightweight DE's and middleweight LB's, have had a good deal of success in combating the relaxation of rules governing coverage of pass recievers. And a smart club - PGH comes to mind - looks at what they see, and runs the ball down their throat and controls the clock. Those spiffy trendy lightning-quick pass rushers start to step on their tongues and run out of gas as the game progresses. Pretty simple. Lombardi was right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramius Posted April 26, 2006 Share Posted April 26, 2006 Because they are thinking of playing him as an outside LB in the 3-4 defense. They think he can rush he passer from there. 671247[/snapback] exactly. these so-called "tweeners" give a defense flexibility. Can play OLB in a 3-4 and be a pass rusher from there, but since he playd DE, it isnt out of the realm of possibility to line him up at DE a few plays if you swich to a 4-man front for a series/play, etc. It gives the defense flexibility. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramius Posted April 26, 2006 Share Posted April 26, 2006 I know Peter Boulware has been a good player in the NFL, but why would anyone think that Wimbley can play after the huge busts Florida State has produced at defensive end? Andre Wadsworth- bust. Reinard Wilson- bust. Jamal Reynolds-bust. Why would Wimbley be any different from Wadsworth Wilson and Reynolds? Bobby Bowden must have some connections to get his guys drafted highly. 671217[/snapback] Ahhh yes. "he plays the same position at the same school as a previous bust, so he's going to be a bust" logic. Brilliant! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrLocke Posted April 26, 2006 Author Share Posted April 26, 2006 Ahhh yes. "he plays the same position at the same school as a previous bust, so he's going to be a bust" logic. Brilliant! 671277[/snapback] I forgot about Derrick Alexander in the 1995 draft. You don't find this trend to be somewhat scary for FSU defensive ends? Read this article. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave mcbride Posted April 27, 2006 Share Posted April 27, 2006 I forgot about Derrick Alexander in the 1995 draft. You don't find this trend to be somewhat scary for FSU defensive ends? Read this article. 671401[/snapback] wadsworth wasn't a bust. he was injured. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts