yall Posted September 21, 2004 Share Posted September 21, 2004 ... same as the old boss? rj with buffalo: 30 games 27 td's 17 ints 110 sacks 7 lost fumbles drew with buffalo: 34 games 37 td's 28 ints 111 sacks 15 lost fumbles win loss - 14 - 20 (for Drew, don't know RJ's off-hand) I can't say that these are 100% accurate as I'm doing this at work with a calculator, but there are a lot of statistical similarities. Anyone know RJ's win loss record? More importantly, what does this mean? Are they both bad QB's? Has the O-Line been a problem for this long? Are our receivers overrated? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nervous Guy Posted September 21, 2004 Share Posted September 21, 2004 that's it I'm joining SETI. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dib Posted September 21, 2004 Share Posted September 21, 2004 that's it I'm joining SETI. Isnt he that Egyptian guy? What? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark VI Posted September 21, 2004 Share Posted September 21, 2004 More importantly, what does this mean? 39658[/snapback] That you wasted bandwith ? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nervous Guy Posted September 21, 2004 Share Posted September 21, 2004 that's it I'm joining SETI.Isnt he that Egyptian guy? What? 39728[/snapback] that's true...but I am thinking of joining the Search for Extra Terrestrial Intelligence....since there ain't none here! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buckeyebrian Posted September 21, 2004 Share Posted September 21, 2004 that's it I'm joining SETI. 39669[/snapback] Isn't that the abominable snowman? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nervous Guy Posted September 21, 2004 Share Posted September 21, 2004 Isn't that the abominable snowman? 39757[/snapback] YETI Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yall Posted September 21, 2004 Author Share Posted September 21, 2004 That you wasted bandwith ? 39741[/snapback] Is that the best you can do? I mean I understand supporting Bledsoe, but when you see how similar the numbers are, isn't a comparison fair? Like I said before, I can't do too much research here at work, so if you disagree with me, that is fine. But please try and back up your discontent with my post with some numbers, and not some stupid quip about bandwidth. Like, for example, what was RJ's win-loss record as a starter? After all that's what matters most right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuckincincy Posted September 21, 2004 Share Posted September 21, 2004 that's it I'm joining SETI. 39669[/snapback] I'll stick with HAARP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuffalOhio Posted September 21, 2004 Share Posted September 21, 2004 The O-Line has sucked for a long long time. Why do you think Flutie had to scramble around so much? The short run of success we had with him at the helm masked the problems with the line. Mike Williams was supposed to be the answer, but that hasn't panned out too well, has it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
R. Rich Posted September 21, 2004 Share Posted September 21, 2004 Isn't that the abominable snowman? 39757[/snapback] Haha!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typical TBD Guy Posted September 21, 2004 Share Posted September 21, 2004 Is that the best you can do? I mean I understand supporting Bledsoe, but when you see how similar the numbers are, isn't a comparison fair? Like I said before, I can't do too much research here at work, so if you disagree with me, that is fine. But please try and back up your discontent with my post with some numbers, and not some stupid quip about bandwidth. Like, for example, what was RJ's win-loss record as a starter? After all that's what matters most right? 39821[/snapback] The Bledsoe Apologists have become more vituperative than usual, to the point now that they're combating researched facts with semi-witty one-liners. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taterhill Posted September 21, 2004 Share Posted September 21, 2004 ... same as the old boss? rj with buffalo: 30 games 27 td's 17 ints 110 sacks 7 lost fumbles drew with buffalo: 34 games 37 td's 28 ints 111 sacks 15 lost fumbles win loss - 14 - 20 (for Drew, don't know RJ's off-hand) I can't say that these are 100% accurate as I'm doing this at work with a calculator, but there are a lot of statistical similarities. Anyone know RJ's win loss record? More importantly, what does this mean? Are they both bad QB's? Has the O-Line been a problem for this long? Are our receivers overrated? 39658[/snapback] would be great insight, if it was not the 5th time this has been posted.....did you hear we landed on the moon? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nervous Guy Posted September 21, 2004 Share Posted September 21, 2004 The Bledsoe Apologists have become more vituperative than usual, to the point now that they're combating researched facts with semi-witty one-liners. 39884[/snapback] While I am NOT a BA I have not noted more vituperative from them, nor any contumelious, invective, opprobrious, scurrile, scurrilous, or truculent tendencies....but the Bledsoe Bashers have certainly been more obstreperous than usual. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mark VI Posted September 21, 2004 Share Posted September 21, 2004 While I am NOT a BA I have not noted more vituperative from them, nor any contumelious, invective, opprobrious, scurrile, scurrilous, or truculent tendencies....but the Bledsoe Bashers have certainly been more obstreperous than usual. 39898[/snapback] Roget just puked in his coffin. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DC Tom Posted September 21, 2004 Share Posted September 21, 2004 ...scurrile, scurrilous... 39898[/snapback] Brought to you by the Department of Redundancy Department... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nervous Guy Posted September 21, 2004 Share Posted September 21, 2004 Brought to you by the Department of Redundancy Department... 39935[/snapback] how's this for Redundancy :I starred in Brokeback Mountain: :I starred in Brokeback Mountain: ?????? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yall Posted September 21, 2004 Author Share Posted September 21, 2004 While I am NOT a BA I have not noted more vituperative from them, nor any contumelious, invective, opprobrious, scurrile, scurrilous, or truculent tendencies....but the Bledsoe Bashers have certainly been more obstreperous than usual. 39898[/snapback] Wow, someone owns a thesaurus! If the search function was enabled, I'm sure I would have seen that someone has posted this before. I apologize for the redundancy. Also, if the search function was enabled, you would see that I have defended not only Drew, but RJ, back in the day. I just wanted an honest comparison between the last 2 Bills quarterbacks. When I found that the numbers were very similar, I started to wonder about the reasons behind the numbers. However, in typical TDB fashion, an honest inquiry is met with derision. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExWNYer Posted September 21, 2004 Share Posted September 21, 2004 Wow, someone owns a thesaurus! I thought they were all extinct...wasn't he a herbivore? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nervous Guy Posted September 21, 2004 Share Posted September 21, 2004 Wow, someone owns a thesaurus! If the search function was enabled, I'm sure I would have seen that someone has posted this before. I apologize for the redundancy. Also, if the search function was enabled, you would see that I have defended not only Drew, but RJ, back in the day. I just wanted an honest comparison between the last 2 Bills quarterbacks. When I found that the numbers were very similar, I started to wonder about the reasons behind the numbers. However, in typical TDB fashion, an honest inquiry is met with derision. 39968[/snapback] relax yall.... 1. I don't own one...why would I when the online ones are free! 2. That post was directed at the padded helmet fellow, not you...since he used a "big word"...it was high brow humor. 3. DC's redundancy post was directed at me, for including two forms of the same word. 4. I too have defended both, but certainly DB is (was?) head and shoulders above RJ. 5. Why are you surprised and/or disappointed by derision here? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts