Billsfed1 Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago One thing i’ve been thinking about, probably since week 4 is what sort of strain may be placed upon the opposing coaching staff on a weekly basis with the roster. Josh Allen, James Cook, O-Line. That’s the only constant…virtually everything else is subject to change week to week. Obviously you wish there were zero injuries, but perhaps if there’s any sort of silver lining in having 100 guys on your team…it’s you never know who’s up, who’s down and i’d imagine that can be challenging when you’re trying to drill down to the individual level to see what sort of tendencies guys might have, when there’s little to no tape on some of them. In the same way the offense is varied, i think the roster gymnastics also makes things somewhat hard to predict. Quote
FitzShowUsYourTitz Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago (edited) Well it would be a lot more challenging if we had a #1 and #2 WR. But somehow I kinda see your point. Sry not sry Edited 1 hour ago by FitzShowUsYourTitz Quote
PonyBoy Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago I really like the everybody eats mentality even if we had a true #1. Someone posted earlier, "I wouldn't mind if we had a receiver that ate a little more than the others". 2 Quote
ganesh Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago The fault with this team is that it has not been able to unearth a true #1 or #2 WR. Even a Shakir has not been developed to improve the vertical game. I see Shakir catching 1-2 yard passes and then trying to run up the field. Not a 1 or 2 Coleman looked like the game changer in the game against Baltimore. Alas, that was a mirage the only guy who has consistently moved the ball downfield is Kincaid and he is missing too many games this season Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.