BringMetheHeadofLeonLett Posted 10 hours ago Author Posted 10 hours ago On 11/6/2025 at 5:34 AM, 4th&long said: I have a friend that lost her job to Ai. If you ask Ai a question the answers are not always right. How can companies rely on that? If you are running a company and Ai ***** up then what? You get what you deserve. What you get is zero accountability. Companies love confusing who is liable for your grandma getting run over by a Waymo car on Christmas eve. Not a great song, but the shareholders like it. Maybe one of you all is smarter than me- can you set up some debates between the competing AI platforms?
milfandcookies Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 17 hours ago, B-Man said: i mean Thomas Jefferson does seem like an AI generated name
All_Pro_Bills Posted 1 hour ago Posted 1 hour ago (edited) I think the problem with AI isn't technology. It's the absence of any open and rational discussion of the social and economic benefits and consequences and how those are distributed across society. Right now it's a race to deploy and then deal with the consequences later. Because if the investment world and its proponents think 10's of millions of workers are going to sit back and watch their jobs disappear and their life prospects evaporate while fat cat corporations, finaciers & banks, and moguls get richer while the huge majority of people suffer, AI proponents are high on some good drugs. And don't throw some idea out there like poverty level universal income. Because tha won't fly. The problem is the benefits are concentrated with the few and the costs are borne by the many. If these clowns think we have affordability and income inequality now just wait. I'll even say it's not that the technology is going to eliminate workers. It the revolutionary scale, speed, and impact of those job losses which make it impossible to have enough time for workers and businesses to adapt to new jobs and skills. Edited 1 hour ago by All_Pro_Bills 1
Recommended Posts