Joe Ferguson forever Posted September 25 Author Posted September 25 (edited) 4 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: Literally none of those books is banned. Each and every one can be purchased at will. I will ask again - are you engaging in fallacy or just lying outright? Either way, you are an absolute jackass. They are banned in schools. Not enough for you? Edited September 25 by Joe Ferguson forever 1
JDHillFan Posted September 25 Posted September 25 Just now, Joe Ferguson forever said: They are banned in schools. Not enough for you? The books can be purchased readily. Get back to me if there’s ever a real “book ban”. You are truly a buffoon. At least this thread got you the attention you crave. 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted September 25 Author Posted September 25 7 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: The books can be purchased readily. Get back to me if there’s ever a real “book ban”. You are truly a buffoon. At least this thread got you the attention you crave. Banned in schools. If non vaxed personnel were only banned in a few hospitals, would they not still be banned? 1
JDHillFan Posted September 25 Posted September 25 (edited) 7 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: Banned in schools. If non vaxed personnel were only banned in a few hospitals, would they not still be banned? Everyone understands what someone of your sort is trying to get at when they start pearl clutching about book bans. FYI - there are none. Anyone that claims otherwise is engaged in fallacy/lying. A specialty of yours. You have successfully turned your navel-gazing thread into mere word games. Really nice work. “thank heavens they decided to remove the book about anal from the elementary school library” -normal people “THEY’RE BANNING BOOKS” - you and roundy Edited September 25 by JDHillFan 1 1 1
Pokebball Posted September 25 Posted September 25 2 hours ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: Why would you consider him an authority on scientific research and then appeal to his authority? See how this works? He clearly identified his source. He didn't present himself as any sort of expert.
Joe Ferguson forever Posted September 25 Author Posted September 25 (edited) 15 minutes ago, Pokebball said: He clearly identified his source. He didn't present himself as any sort of expert. So why would you use him to further your argument? By definition, you used appeal to authority fallacy. Edited September 25 by Joe Ferguson forever 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted September 25 Author Posted September 25 27 minutes ago, JDHillFan said: Everyone understands what someone of your sort is trying to get at when they start pearl clutching about book bans. FYI - there are none. Anyone that claims otherwise is engaged in fallacy/lying. A specialty of yours. You have successfully turned your navel-gazing thread into mere word games. Really nice work. “thank heavens they decided to remove the book about anal from the elementary school library” -normal people “THEY’RE BANNING BOOKS” - you and roundy I’m not the one trying to redefine “banned”. 1
BillsFanNC Posted September 25 Posted September 25 They're banning books!!!! Meanwhile....a book from a SCHOOL LIBRARY...that no sane parent wants on the shelf for their kid to peruse. 1 1
Pokebball Posted September 25 Posted September 25 18 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: So why would you use him to further your argument? By definition, you used appeal to authority fallacy. because he clearly identified his source? 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted September 25 Author Posted September 25 1 minute ago, Pokebball said: because he clearly identified his source? He is the source. Why not directly link to his primary source. I couldn’t bring myself to listen to a libertarian, Fox News economist. 1
Pokebball Posted September 25 Posted September 25 45 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: He is the source. Why not directly link to his primary source. I couldn’t bring myself to listen to a libertarian, Fox News economist. you really should give it a listen so you don't respond in ignorance 2
Joe Ferguson forever Posted September 25 Author Posted September 25 11 minutes ago, Pokebball said: you really should give it a listen so you don't respond in ignorance He doesn’t give any specific citations up to the point I had to stop. Why not original link on a statistician or author of a paper on replication theory? Save everyone time and put you in a better light. 1
Pokebball Posted September 25 Posted September 25 Just now, Joe Ferguson forever said: He doesn’t give any specific citations up to the point I had to stop. Why not original link on a statistician or author of a paper on replication theory? Save everyone time and put you in a better light. your choice 1 1
BillsFanNC Posted September 25 Posted September 25 Truth: None of the following want to touch the above truth come hell or high water: Finding, Roundy, Quack, Tibstain, The King, 4th&schlong et al.
Joe Ferguson forever Posted September 25 Author Posted September 25 4 minutes ago, BillsFanNC said: Truth: None of the following want to touch the above truth come hell or high water: Finding, Roundy, Quack, Tibstain, The King, 4th&schlong et al. Isn’t polymarket a betting site? isn’t this discussed in a thread where it’s relevant? 1
JDHillFan Posted September 25 Posted September 25 17 minutes ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: Isn’t polymarket a betting site? isn’t this discussed in a thread where it’s relevant? By deflecting to “what’s polymarket” over a story you know to be true (even if you don’t want to acknowledge the truth because who knows if truth exists) what are you engaging in? It’s not a lie or fallacy but it seems inherently dishonest and disingenuous. Why did you choose that path? 1
BillsFanNC Posted September 25 Posted September 25 (edited) Quack doing the attack the messenger two step in the face of truth in his own truth thread? Edited September 25 by BillsFanNC 1 1
JDHillFan Posted September 25 Posted September 25 Let’s check in with the creator of “does truth exist”: On 3/6/2023 at 3:15 PM, Joe Ferguson forever said: I've seen it 100's of times. I don't believe he has any cognitive impairment. His speech has been abnormal his entire life. by all accounts, it has actually improved. gait and facial expressions abnormalities are more suggestive of Parkinsons but I don't see those characteristic changes either and he has no tremor. On 4/12/2025 at 10:35 AM, Joe Ferguson forever said: What makes you think I saw many demented ("senile" isn't an accepted clinical term) patients? Biden's infirmity was purposefully hidden. Sigh 1
Joe Ferguson forever Posted September 26 Author Posted September 26 2 hours ago, JDHillFan said: Let’s check in with the creator of “does truth exist”: Sigh “What makes you think” was a question to “doc” but thanks for reminding me where I proved his fraud. He thought I was a neurologist. I’m not. But I have seen demented patients 100s of times your stalking is slightly unsettling. After criticizing the topic, you post in it insufferably 1
Recommended Posts