boyst Posted September 24 Posted September 24 .......so........ Just downplaying that someone was killed for politics? What's the point here? The fact remains liberals are a threat to this country. 1 2
JaCrispy Posted September 24 Author Posted September 24 (edited) 33 minutes ago, boyst said: .......so........ Just downplaying that someone was killed for politics? What's the point here? The fact remains liberals are a threat to this country. I’m not downplaying anything…only going where potential evidence might lead. If it turns out that Kirk wasn’t killed by who we initially thought, it doesn’t mean it still wasn’t a political assassination. Both can still be true. But I’m just keeping an open mind due to the fact that the official narrative and physics are not congruent, based on experts, who have dealt with the type of firearm the suspect allegedly used. We shouldn’t let the emotional gravity of the situation blind us if the evidence takes us in a different direction. We should always seek truth, even if the answer isn’t a pleasant one. 👍 People expected the exit wound to be in the back, because it was thought the shooter was in front of Kirk. However, this theory provides an answer to that mystery, claiming the shot came from behind and that the exit wound was actually the front of the neck. Not saying it is absolute- just that it is an intriguing explaination, reminiscent of “the shooter in the grassy knoll” during the Kennedy assassination. Edited September 24 by JaCrispy
JDHillFan Posted September 24 Posted September 24 44 minutes ago, JaCrispy said: I wish I could give this all of the red X, the thumbs down, the eye roll and the vomit emoji in reaction. 1 1
JaCrispy Posted September 24 Author Posted September 24 (edited) I don’t understand why everyone is getting so upset over this…I certainly didn’t expect this kind of a reaction, especially from people I normally agree with. Just using simple logic, you have to realize there are several holes in the official narrative that just don’t add up (unless officials decide to revise the narrative). We should at least keep an open mind while all research has had time to be done. Edited September 24 by JaCrispy
Royale with Cheese Posted September 24 Posted September 24 2 minutes ago, JaCrispy said: I don’t understand why everyone is getting so upset over this…I certainly didn’t expect this kind of a reaction, especially from people I normally agree with. Just using simple logic, you have to realize there are several holes in the official narrative that just don’t add up (unless officials decide to revise the narrative). We shouldn’t let at least keep an open mind while all research has had time to be done. You assuming every bit of this information is completely accurate. I can go on google and find evidence Elvis is still alive.
JaCrispy Posted September 24 Author Posted September 24 3 minutes ago, Royale with Cheese said: You assuming every bit of this information is completely accurate. I can go on google and find evidence Elvis is still alive. I said it was an interesting theory, that would explain the exit wound. I didn’t say it was absolutely true- Just trying to fill in the gaps of the official narrative with another point of view. The video certainly could be doctored to make it seem like something else could have happened- we don’t know, and I’m not claiming to. I just thought it was an interesting video and would be some good food for thought. As for Elvis, I saw him in a wheel chair at my local ShopRite…so don’t get me started. 😉 1
JFKjr Posted September 24 Posted September 24 It's possible Tyler Robinson was just a patsy. The "Missed Family Robinson." But that still leaves someone else who wanted him gone, which doesn't really change anything. Patsies are a time-honored conspiracy tradition. Wouldn't surprise me if it took more than one person to pull this off. I still wonder about the 'baseball signals' I saw on the video. But he's still gone, regardless. 1
Recommended Posts