Jump to content

Political Violence. Where do you stand?  

65 members have voted

  1. 1. Were those who engaged in violence at the US Capitol on J6 wrong?

  2. 2. Are those who are engaging in ongoing violence against Tesla dealerships, charging stations and vehicles wrong?

  3. 3. Was the assassination of Charlie Kirk wrong?

    • Yes
    • No
      0
    • It depends
      0


Recommended Posts

Posted
1 minute ago, Homelander said:

 

You can wave the white flag anytime - you’re already losing to reality.

 


 

Inevitable 

 


God wins.  You already lost.  Eternity for you isn’t going to be pleasant.  

  • Agree 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:


 

Inevitable 

 


God wins.  You already lost.  Eternity for you isn’t going to be pleasant.  

 

Wow, I was worried about real-world consequences, but clearly eternal doom is the bigger issue - lmao.

 

Just know - if there’s a God, your hate-filled, Bible-hiding ass is the one I’d worry about. 

Posted

“Have a family raise your kids leave a legacy.”

 

-Charlie Kirk

 

 

 

 

”***t post and troll all day about Trump on a message board.”

 

—Homeloser.  

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Big Blitz said:

“Have a family raise your kids leave a legacy.”

 

-Charlie Kirk

 

 

 

 

”***t post and troll all day about Trump on a message board.”

 

—Homeloser.  

 

Vintage Charlie

 

 

Posted

As Homeloser tries to suppress down Mrs. Kirk’s beautiful speech - I want to acknowledge the sane true liberals

 


 

Cenk gets it.  
 

 

Homeloser heading straight to hell.

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Homelander said:

 

 

Charlie Kirk - just... as @Big Blitz would say - "beautiful"

 

 

 

Like @BillsFanNC said - we are NOT the same.

 

 


 

Yep.  Because they kept the motive completely quiet to blame conservatives. 
 

Keep going.  You’re on an island.  
 

Childless.  Nothing.  Nobody.  Resorts to this predictable display this evening.  Even got a Signal Chat bump!  

 

 

Straight to he** 


 

Yeeeeeeep.  
 

Which, Homeloser is absolutely not.  
 

 

 

Posted
12 minutes ago, Big Blitz said:

 

Yep.  Because they kept the motive completely quiet to blame conservatives. 

 

Hoax.

 

Even Grok says you're full of *****.

 

No, the claim that authorities "kept the motive completely quiet to blame conservatives" in the attack on Paul Pelosi is false. The motive behind the October 28, 2022, assault by David DePape was publicly disclosed shortly after his arrest, based on his own statements to police, his online activity, and subsequent court proceedings. It was explicitly tied to far-right conspiracy theories, which are commonly associated with conservative extremism, but there was no suppression of information by officials to fabricate blame. Instead, the rapid public revelation of DePape's far-right views led to immediate backlash from some conservatives, who then promoted disinformation to deflect responsibility.

 

 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Homelander said:

 

Hoax.

 

Even Grok says you're full of *****.

 

No, the claim that authorities "kept the motive completely quiet to blame conservatives" in the attack on Paul Pelosi is false. The motive behind the October 28, 2022, assault by David DePape was publicly disclosed shortly after his arrest, based on his own statements to police, his online activity, and subsequent court proceedings. It was explicitly tied to far-right conspiracy theories, which are commonly associated with conservative extremism, but there was no suppression of information by officials to fabricate blame. Instead, the rapid public revelation of DePape's far-right views led to immediate backlash from some conservatives, who then promoted disinformation to deflect responsibility.

 

 


 

Grok omg

 

 

 


“For us, revealing that evidence through the media is just not what we think is appropriate,” the Democrat DA told CNNLOL last week. “We want to make sure that this individual is held accountable for these egregious acts. For us, we’re going to make sure that we limit the evidence as much as possible in order to get that done.”
 

 

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/1392633/san-francisco-da-shoots-down-public-interest-in-releasing-bodycam-footage-from-pelosi-attack/
 


Local law enforcement were covering it up. 
 

Period.  
 

And even if not true that’s what Kirk was referencing.  You scum bag.  

 

Posted
1 minute ago, Big Blitz said:


 

Grok omg

 

 

 


“For us, revealing that evidence through the media is just not what we think is appropriate,” the Democrat DA told CNNLOL last week. “We want to make sure that this individual is held accountable for these egregious acts. For us, we’re going to make sure that we limit the evidence as much as possible in order to get that done.”
 

 

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/1392633/san-francisco-da-shoots-down-public-interest-in-releasing-bodycam-footage-from-pelosi-attack/
 


Local law enforcement were covering it up. 
 

Period.  
 

And even if not true that’s what Kirk was referencing.  You scum bag.  

 

 

@Big Blitz, consumed by nonstop hate, clings to his zealotry to defend a man who told his followers to bail out someone now serving 30 years for beating an elderly person. You couldn’t make this up if you tried.

 

 

 

Posted
On 3/20/2025 at 12:23 PM, BillsFanNC said:

You either condemn ALL political violence without parsing and hand waving or you can't/won't. 

 

Never forget

 

 

Posted

Never forget.

 

On 3/20/2025 at 12:23 PM, BillsFanNC said:

You either condemn ALL political violence without parsing and hand waving or you can't/won't. 

 

 

 

×
×
  • Create New...