Homelander Posted July 21 Posted July 21 2 hours ago, Big Blitz said: Stop defending treason. Hypocrites January 6, 2021
B-Man Posted July 21 Posted July 21 NO ONE IS SURPRISED, even the lemmings here who claim it is fake.
Big Blitz Posted July 21 Posted July 21 5 minutes ago, B-Man said: NO ONE IS SURPRISED, even the lemmings here who claim it is fake. Don’t forget about Epstein!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 1
B-Man Posted July 21 Posted July 21 3 hours ago, Big Blitz said: Dam all the threads Homeloser bumps to push down the real news - these things can get lost That is indeed the purpose. .
BillsFanNC Posted July 21 Author Posted July 21 (edited) So here is the latest rationalization by the Democrat/Media Complex: "OK, yes, after Trump was elected in 2016 Obama and his team fabricated a bogus intelligence estimate out of whole cloth for the purpose of making sure Trump was never inaugurated, but that's just politics and none of it was illegal. Move along, nothing to see here." Edited July 21 by BillsFanNC
B-Man Posted July 21 Posted July 21 Explaining Russiagate: Why the December 9th, 2016 Meeting Mattered: It’s not just what the Intelligence Community planned to say about Russian interference, it’s who would have seen the text. MATT TAIBBI In between all this, an important detail is being lost. Democrats are hammering an “apples and oranges” argument, saying documents showing intelligence officials planned a Presidential Daily Briefing on December 9th, 2016 that would say “Foreign adversaries did not use cyberattacks on election infrastructure to alter the US Presidential election outcome” and “We have no evidence of cyber manipulation of election infrastructure intended to alter results” were meaningless. As Himes put it, the fact that “Russians could not use cyber tools to mess with the voting infrastructure, the machines that tally our votes” was “true then, and it is true now.” Two things about this statement, disingenuous in multiple ways: One is a crucial fact left out of Saturday’s Racket article on the DNI releases. Had the intelligence community gone forward with a Presidential Daily Briefing that said Russia had not attacked infrastructure in a way “intended to alter results,” it would have been seen by a key audience: Donald Trump. Presidents-elect are entitled to read Presidential Daily Briefings. During the transition, Trump’s National Security Adviser Michael Flynn was already being read in, and would have seen the planned December 9th text downplaying Russian interference. “I would have seen it,” Flynn says now. “I was reading the PDBs at that point.” Asked yesterday if he thought that might have been a reason for holding the planned draft, Flynn said, “Very likely.” Second, the notion that Russia interfered with actual vote tallies was no fringe conspiracy theory then. It was widely believed by Democratic voters. This was almost certainly a consequence of a two stage process that began with the flood of news stories based on leaks from intelligence sources beginning on December 9th, 2016. These not only alleged Russia interfered to help Donald Trump in an abrupt about-face from pre-election stories, but focused heavily on Russian hacking. Within a week — by December 16th, 2016 — Hillary Clinton was publicly calling the election “unfair, not free, illegitimate,” adding, “Vladimir Putin himself directed the covert cyberattacks against our electoral system, against our democracy, apparently because he has a personal beef against me.” . . . Notwithstanding either the Himes comments (“This is Epstein all over again”) or Trump’s apocalyptic Guy Fawkes-themed Truth Social post, the meeting on December 9th that switched out a tepid PDB for a dramatic narrative about Russian interference to help Trump was hugely meaningful. It positioned Steele Dossier conclusions as mainstream news, set up Trump to be investigated by his own incoming FBI Director, and made sure the incoming administration did not see dissenting intelligence about Russian meddling. https://www.racket.news/p/explaining-russiagate-why-the-december? It was all bull####, and all the key figures knew it was from the beginning. .
B-Man Posted July 21 Posted July 21 WaPo Pulitzer Prize Winning Journo Calls New Russia-gate Document Dump 'Jaw-Dropping' We've been yelling for years that the whole 'Trump-Russia collusion' nonsense was a Deep State setup cooked up by Obama, Hillary, and their intel goons to kneecap a president they couldn't beat fair and square. Now, even a Pulitzer Prize-winning former Washington Post investigative reporter – yeah, from the swamp's favorite rag – is admitting it's 'slam-dunk evidence of a conspiracy.' https://twitchy.com/samj/2025/07/21/even-wapo-pulitzer-prize-winning-jouno-has-to-admit-new-russia-hoax-dump-a-slam-dunk-of-evidence-n2415976
Recommended Posts