Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

When you politicize and weaponize intelligence agencies and law enforcement to go after your political opponents, that is textbook conspiracy against rights.

 

That's exactly what President Biden, President Obama and Hillary Clinton all did back in 2016 to President Trump.

 

The statute of limitations for federal felonies is generally five years.

But for conspiracies, the statute of limitations does not start running until the conspiracy ends.

 

You have to disavow the conspiracy.

 

Not only have they not disavowed the conspiracy, it's ongoing, and they continue to lie and cover it up.

Thanks for having me on, @glennbeck.

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Agree 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted

 

 

With the Obama-led Intelligence Report on Russia Imploding, the Dems Will Likely Flock to This Narrative

Matt Vespa 

 

117e13c2-e870-4f46-8fa4-eaa7a19bf290-105

 

The Russia collusion hoax has been exposed.

 

It was always an open secret, but now we have the documents, thanks to Tulsi Gabbard releasing troves of files, all of which bear the fingerprints of the usual suspects.  

 

Some, such as former CIA Director John Brennan and fired FBI Director James Comey, are already being investigated. James Clapper and Barack Obama should be next, for knowingly politicizing and weaponizing the intelligence to hamstring Donald Trump. The intelligence community was adamant that Moscow couldn’t interfere in our elections. Then, Obama ordered Clapper to draft a new intelligence report, which used the Steele Dossier as its foundation. That document, a Clinton campaign-funded opposition research project, is at the heart of this operation. Even Clapper didn’t believe it, but reportedly silenced any analyst who raised objections. 

 

That report is now obliterated like the Iranian nuclear facility at Fordow. So, Democrats are likely going to rush to the “bipartisan” Senate Intelligence Committee’s report, which is much more friendly to liberal narratives about the Russian collusion hoax. It likely won’t hold. As RealClearInvestigations’ Paul Sperry noted, the report’s main witness, Lisa Monaco, was an Obama acolyte who was part of the infamous December 9, 2016, meeting, where Barack ordered the intelligence community to draft the new intelligence assessment. He gave the deep state the green light to go after a duly elected president. A campaign of media leaks was also part of the strategy—Monaco reportedly played a key role.

 

It’s all infected, kids. The entire hoax is being exposed and will continue to be. More document dumps are expected; more whistleblowers are likely to come forward. 

 

https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2025/07/21/the-dems-likely-counterpoint-on-russian-collusion-hoax-isnt-going-to-hold-up-well-n2660667

 

 

  • Like (+1) 1
  • Thank you (+1) 1
Posted


 

 

 


 

POS

 


CIA plant from day 1

 

 

I need someone to find the NBC News feed of Obama’s 2004 DNC speech.  
 

At the end of it - Tim Russert excitedly cheers “wow!  He could be President!”

 

 

That happened.  They groomed him from day 1 to destroy this country. 
 

Who is the “they?”  That should be obvious by now.   


 

Hint:  It ain’t China

  • Like (+1) 1
Posted

Must watch. Again, not for the useful idiots.

 

Megyn has been skeptical about nailing the Obama regime on the Russia hoax previously. 

 

Not anymore.

 

 

  • Thank you (+1) 2
Posted

🚨 BREAKING: DNI Tulsi Gabbard just released declassified files showing the Obama Intelligence Community *DID NOT* have any proof that Russian President Vladimir Putin wanted to help elect Trump in 2016, but published intelligence suggesting otherwise - AT THE REQUEST OF OBAMA.

Holy SMOKES. It was all one huge lie, like we knew - now it's being proven.

This report has never been released to the public, per Fox.

The ICA was reportedly "rushed" out, 2 weeks before Trump got sworn in.

CIA Director John Brennan: "ordered the post-election publication of 15 reports containing previously collected but unpublished intelligence, three of which were substandard—containing information that was unclear, of uncertain origin, potentially biased, or implausible—and those became foundational sources for the ICA judgements that Putin preferred Trump over Clinton."

It's ALL COMING OUT.

Thank you, @TulsiGabbard.

  • Angry 1
Posted

Crickets from useful idiot leftists still?

 

I'm shocked!

 

Declassified records via

@DNIGabbard

make the case that the 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment was “ordered by" and "subject to unusual directives" from President Obama •Draft "not properly coordinated" with IC components, purposefully deviated from professional standards •To ensure publication "without significant challenges" to its conclusion

×
×
  • Create New...