San-O Posted May 9, 2005 Author Share Posted May 9, 2005 Your "logic" is getting tiresome. First, you compare salaries for a QB compared to a #4 pick. Yeah, lots of congruency there. Next, you make the comment regarding only one o-linemen drafted in 2005 - which indicates you actually think an O-linemen could actually step right in and have an impact his first year. Brilliant. It's OK to question Donahoe, but at least don't be a friggin idiot when you do it. 331799[/snapback] Sorry I continue to offend you. I realize I am probably over critical, however I really love my Buffalo Bills. Grew up in Hamburg, about 5 minutes away from the Ralph, and believe as probably some others on the board do that we have had a subpar O-line for too long, and believe a good team should be built around the linemen on both sides of the ball. Current management doesn't seem to place a high value on drafting linemen: I am starting to think this is never going to happen. Not a GM, just a fan who wants to see our team moving forward with solid O-line and D-line drafts. Hope I am wrong. GO BILLS! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
todd Posted May 9, 2005 Share Posted May 9, 2005 Current management doesn't seem to place a high value on drafting linemen:I am starting to think this is never going to happen. Not a GM, just a fan who wants to see our team moving forward with solid O-line and D-line drafts. Hope I am wrong. GO BILLS! 332151[/snapback] You ARE wrong, that's the thing! Donahoe and crew have drafted plenty of linemen on both sides of the ball. They've also brought in FAs. I don't know what drafts you are looking at, but a draft lasts 7 rounds, not to mention UDFAs, and you'll see that there have been plenty of linemen brought in. Truth be told, there are plenty of need areas other than OL and DL that require attention. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts