muppy Posted 6 hours ago Posted 6 hours ago 1 hour ago, B-Man said: you REFUSE to even say a word about why Trump coddled Maxwell. none of MAGA faithful are willing to speculate . why? because it STINKS It HURTS his credibility.mIt just does ***CRICKETS************ pathetic maga. BRAVO COWARDS 1
JFKjr Posted 5 hours ago Posted 5 hours ago 26 minutes ago, muppy said: you REFUSE to even say a word about why Trump coddled Maxwell. none of MAGA faithful are willing to speculate . why? because it STINKS It HURTS his credibility.mIt just does ***CRICKETS************ pathetic maga. BRAVO COWARDS Maybe Trump has bigger fish to fry. Are we even sure Epstein is dead? You seem really attached to this issue. Any particular reason why? And where was that interest when the Really Sharp Guy could've given us all this information? 1
B-Man Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 2 hours ago, muppy said: you REFUSE to even say a word about why Trump coddled Maxwell. none of MAGA faithful are willing to speculate . There is your answer Mup. verb 1.form a theory or conjecture about a subject without firm evidence. No thanks. .
JDHillFan Posted 3 hours ago Posted 3 hours ago 2 hours ago, muppy said: you REFUSE to even say a word about why Trump coddled Maxwell. none of MAGA faithful are willing to speculate . why? because it STINKS It HURTS his credibility.mIt just does ***CRICKETS************ pathetic maga. BRAVO COWARDS To you, anyone TO your right is MAGA faithful. That’s WHY you are NOT to be TAKEN seriously. I am to the RIGHT of you but am NOT what DIMWITTED people like you, Redhawk, and Nedboi reflexively CALL maga. The move to a different PRISON smells fishy. There is certainly MORE to the story. Using HAPHAZARD all caps is tiring AND tiresome.
Joe Ferguson forever Posted 2 hours ago Posted 2 hours ago (edited) 34 minutes ago, B-Man said: There is your answer Mup. verb 1.form a theory or conjecture about a subject without firm evidence. No thanks. . You maga thugs make stretching conclusions on flimsy evidence when it supports your narrative but you can't connect the dots here. Read what this Fox report had to say including the opinion of a former palm beach county state attorney. You don't find it at all suspicious that she was moved a week after being interviewed by Todd Blanche when she tried to exonerate trump? Be honest for once. https://www.foxnews.com/us/jeffrey-epstein-accomplice-ghislaine-maxwell-moved-new-prison-amid-fight-over-answers-immunity "The decision on whether someone gets moved to a better facility is generally made by the Bureau of Prisons, and there's a procedure to follow," Aronberg said. "It's hard to imagine that the lengthy interview that Maxwell had with the number two official at the Department of Justice had nothing to do with the transfer. It almost certainly did." The meeting came just days after the House Oversight Committee issued a subpoena asking Maxwell to testify in front of lawmakers regarding Epstein’s crimes. Maxwell’s legal team has since asserted she would consider testifying if granted immunity – a demand the panel swiftly rejected. Edited 2 hours ago by Joe Ferguson forever 1
muppy Posted 33 minutes ago Posted 33 minutes ago 2 hours ago, B-Man said: There is your answer Mup. verb 1.form a theory or conjecture about a subject without firm evidence. No thanks. . what's that sound? ***crickets*** a big NOTHING I rest my case. IT STINKS to High Heaven and You know it 2 hours ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: You maga thugs make stretching conclusions on flimsy evidence when it supports your narrative but you can't connect the dots here. Read what this Fox report had to say including the opinion of a former palm beach county state attorney. You don't find it at all suspicious that she was moved a week after being interviewed by Todd Blanche when she tried to exonerate trump? Be honest for once. https://www.foxnews.com/us/jeffrey-epstein-accomplice-ghislaine-maxwell-moved-new-prison-amid-fight-over-answers-immunity "The decision on whether someone gets moved to a better facility is generally made by the Bureau of Prisons, and there's a procedure to follow," Aronberg said. "It's hard to imagine that the lengthy interview that Maxwell had with the number two official at the Department of Justice had nothing to do with the transfer. It almost certainly did." The meeting came just days after the House Oversight Committee issued a subpoena asking Maxwell to testify in front of lawmakers regarding Epstein’s crimes. Maxwell’s legal team has since asserted she would consider testifying if granted immunity – a demand the panel swiftly rejected. Bingo
JDHillFan Posted 22 minutes ago Posted 22 minutes ago 2 hours ago, Joe Ferguson forever said: You maga thugs make stretching conclusions on flimsy evidence when it supports your narrative but you can't connect the dots here. You pretended Biden was fine. The most obvious dots we have seen in our lifetime went unconnected for you. Embarrassing.
Recommended Posts