Joe Miner Posted December 19, 2016 Share Posted December 19, 2016 I win. http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/12/18/washington-post-virgin-mary-offends-rape-victims-by-her-purity/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boyst Posted December 19, 2016 Share Posted December 19, 2016 (edited) I win. http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/12/18/washington-post-virgin-mary-offends-rape-victims-by-her-purity/ about the author... Everhart. Derived from Eberhard/Eberhardt. German background dating back to 1200 as earliest traced, the family has been associated with western European influence and began its roots in the US as early as Columbus, when family was aboard some of his first ships. This chick has privilege up the ass. Edited December 19, 2016 by Boyst62 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
4merper4mer Posted December 19, 2016 Author Share Posted December 19, 2016 I like a lot of the supplementary ideas, but I'm beginning to think that we're all making a mistake in how we're looking at this. We're using logic, albeit stupid logic, in pointing out the supposed social transgressions we're attributing to ships throughout western history. What we need is to be completely inane and hissy-fit level stupid with this, so let's go full Gator: The use of the word "ship" as a suffix in everyday parlance. Words like relationship, friendship, internship, worship, etc. The use of "ship" as a suffix imparts white colonial male domination over everyone else, and should be replaced instead with something completely neutral and inoffensive. Any ideas? I like it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts