OCinBuffalo Posted April 20, 2010 Share Posted April 20, 2010 In case you don't know, any time you hear the word "aggressive" in regard to Dan Synder...think stupid. There is a very long list of patently stupid moves, that started out being called "aggressive", by Snyder's asshat bootlickers in the DC media. And, usually these very same media types are involved, willingly or as patsies, in tampering with players on other teams. They do this by "reporting" = creating speculation that a player is unhappy, and then saying that, of course, Snyder will be willing to come in and "help". Synder, etc. has been caught and convicted by the league multiple times. The fun part is, for all of this douchebaggery, the Redskins are still perennial losers/1st round playoff losers, losers in general. We all remember what we said and how we felt about the Albert Hanyesworth deal last year. Approximately one hour ago, the Redskins just traded for a DT from the Rams(which on its face, looks like a good deal for the Skins). Meanwhile Haynesworth has been complaining about his role in the new defense they are running(4-3). Meanwhile, Synder is well, Snyder. Meanwhile, we need a NT, and this guy is a 28 year old, 350 lb monster. Add it all up? What if Snyder decides to "aggressively" let Haynesworth go? Or, what if he thinks he has to trade him? (Even better , there is nobody in the league I would rather trade with than Snyder). Can we get our media types to start talking up a certain Redskins DT feels for his new role, competition, etc.? Can we turn this around on them? I know he makes 100 million/6 years, blah, blah, blah. None of that changes the fact that we need an elite NT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JinVA Posted April 20, 2010 Share Posted April 20, 2010 The skins ran a 4-3 last year and are switching to a 3-4 this season. That's why Haynesworth is upset. Why would he be any happier here? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Malazan Posted April 20, 2010 Share Posted April 20, 2010 The skins ran a 4-3 last year and are switching to a 3-4 this season. That's why Haynesworth is upset. Why would he be any happier here? this...and he has work ethic issues. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hazed and Amuzed Posted April 20, 2010 Share Posted April 20, 2010 The skins ran a 4-3 last year and are switching to a 3-4 this season. That's why Haynesworth is upset. Why would he be any happier here? Exactly Haynesworth doesn't want to play in a 34. Maybe because it exposes him? just a thought. Trading for him IMO wouldn't cost too much because of his disgruntlement and his contract. I'd guess a 4th or 5th. Bringing him here however would be a mistake, We'd just have the same problem that the Skins are having. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tombstone56 Posted April 20, 2010 Share Posted April 20, 2010 SNYDER is showing how stupidly clueless he is in the NFL. years ago he" bought" Dan Wilkinson and Dana Stubbelfield He over paid then too,,the going rate was about 18 million he gave them 26,,the Ted Washington s who was our fa trhat year got bumped near there in his contract ,which got Bruce bitchin,, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ishouldbegm Posted April 20, 2010 Share Posted April 20, 2010 redskins want to make him a nt, he could be a de for us and be happy.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EastRochBillsfan Posted April 20, 2010 Share Posted April 20, 2010 the primodana doesnt want to play nose tackle. one would think that if a player makes a 100 million dollars or whatever the hell he makes, he would do whatever his boss wants him to do. NO FREAKIN WAY do i want this man on our team. pass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EastRochBillsfan Posted April 20, 2010 Share Posted April 20, 2010 redskins want to make him a nt, he could be a de for us and be happy.... this is a good point, but i'm sticking with my comment above. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vincec Posted April 20, 2010 Share Posted April 20, 2010 Exactly Haynesworth doesn't want to play in a 34. Maybe because it exposes him? just a thought. Trading for him IMO wouldn't cost too much because of his disgruntlement and his contract. I'd guess a 4th or 5th. Bringing him here however would be a mistake, We'd just have the same problem that the Skins are having. If the Bills could get Haynesworth for a 4th or 5th round draft pick, they would be idiots not to do it. Something tells me it would take more than that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
apuszczalowski Posted April 21, 2010 Share Posted April 21, 2010 Read the following slowly so it soaks in HE DOES NOT WANT TO PLAY IN A 3-4 DEFENCE WHICH IS WHAT SHANAHAN IS CHANGING THEIR DEFENCE OVER TO. BUFFALO IS SWITCHING TO A 3-4 DEFENCE WHICH IS THE REASON HE WANTS OUT! If he felt he wanted to play DE in a 3-4 defence, he would be switched to that spot in Washington. If he doesn't want to play in a 3-4 defence in Washington, whats the difference playing in Buffalo now? Atleast this is an original idea that has never been brought up before around here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hazed and Amuzed Posted April 21, 2010 Share Posted April 21, 2010 Read the following slowly so it soaks in HE DOES NOT WANT TO PLAY IN A 3-4 DEFENCE WHICH IS WHAT SHANAHAN IS CHANGING THEIR DEFENCE OVER TO. BUFFALO IS SWITCHING TO A 3-4 DEFENCE WHICH IS THE REASON HE WANTS OUT! If he felt he wanted to play DE in a 3-4 defence, he would be switched to that spot in Washington. If he doesn't want to play in a 3-4 defence in Washington, whats the difference playing in Buffalo now? Atleast this is an original idea that has never been brought up before around here Stop being Canadian, wouldya? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts