SDS Posted January 9, 2010 Share Posted January 9, 2010 In their Jim Mora story on SC - they referred to the Seahawks -8 turnover DIFFERENTIAL. That could be the 1st time I have ever seen that stat referred to in the correct manner by a major media source. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nanker Posted January 9, 2010 Share Posted January 9, 2010 In their Jim Mora story on SC - they referred to the Seahawks -8 turnover DIFFERENTIAL. That could be the 1st time I have ever seen that stat referred to in the correct manner by a major media source. Well, blind squirrel - meets nut! Doesn't happen much though - does it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
silvermike Posted January 9, 2010 Share Posted January 9, 2010 You mean the Seahawks didn't give the ball away -8 times for each opposing fumble or interception? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
turftoe Posted January 9, 2010 Share Posted January 9, 2010 You mean the Seahawks didn't give the ball away -8 times for each opposing fumble or interception? Not quite. For each negative give-away there must be a positive take-away. Simmply add the negative fumbles and interceptions, remembering to subtract the positive take aways. Remember, the key is to remember that when you subtract a negative from a positive, you add a positive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sisyphean Bills Posted January 9, 2010 Share Posted January 9, 2010 It's OK. They're in the -8th percentile. [sic] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hazed and Amuzed Posted January 9, 2010 Share Posted January 9, 2010 In their Jim Mora story on SC - they referred to the Seahawks -8 turnover DIFFERENTIAL. That could be the 1st time I have ever seen that stat referred to in the correct manner by a major media source. Did this really deserve it's own thread? Mods please review this thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts