molson_golden2002

Ergo, murder should be legal?

Don't you know? Every sperm is sacred, every sperm is good. And if one gets wated, God gets quite irate --Monty Python

Ya, they have been checking passengers for box cutters since then. Didn't need to invade Iraq to do that

Ya, and invading Iraq really worked well in ending terrorism. Havn't had any terrorism lately have we? And since we still have crime, I guess the criminal justice system should be considered a failure, let's just get rid of it!

I knew someone would become unhindged if I wrote that, But I do believe the best way--not the only way--to deal with terrorism is by treating it as a crime

Great, she has a lot in common with the founding fathers then

The courts used to fight terrorism. How so un-macho. Yet it worked!

You would think the moron could at least have had the damn safety

And the Protestants, too. National Socialim was basically a state religion, as in a worship of the state. Christianity focused the minds of the people on another world instead of worship of Hitler. Pagenism was seen as truly "German." Christiany was seen as "international," much like socialism and Judaism. The Nazis tolerated the Curches because they had to. But there were conflicts. There was active resistance to the placing of swastikas in churches and the Nazis backed down.

So what, the government doesn't tell doctors how to operate on a patient either. I mean get a grip

Still helps more Americans than a free market approach would, and it won't collaspe

Actually you missed the point blockhead. Paulson isn't in charge of deciding where the money will go? Sounds like he's pretty busy running something.

And this message has been brought to you by a partisan of the right, who believes government is bad, except when it needs to bail out capitalism

Does this me RKFast shouldn't tell me to lay down under a trator tread?

If he has to go to jail for a few years I wonder if he will challange that the NY law is unconstitutional? I wonder how the court would rule. The DC ruling seems to leave open the possibility http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/20...otus-guns_N.htm

I was thinking more along the lines that you don't use a flamethrower to rid your house of termites. Our military was not designed to stop people from hijacking planes, yet many people want to treat the "War on Terrorism" as a new Cold War. RK made the remark about us "laying down our arms" like liberals are surender monkeies or whatever. But, the biggest attack on the nation could have been stopped by people without any weapons at all. If the hijackers were checked for sharp objects there would have been no attack. I don't know--or really want to--what would happen if we had no military. I can't believe anyone would invade us. There might be more problems around the world, but I think we would stay sovereign without many problems. Hell, we might even be safer.

I was messing with him, but what are you getting at?

I like the Eagle's Christmas song Bell will be ringing.....

http://www.qwizx.com/gssfx/usa/tpirhorns.wav

That giant military albatross sure was a big help on 9-11 Did about as much good as praying does

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20081202/ap_on_...MrQb3zUH4ms0NUE Them atheists are at it again!

http://www.sun-sentinel.com/sfl-1202potato...0,5837005.story

As a local sidenote, Robert H. Jackson of Jamestown, NY wrote that opinion for the court

Oh stop!!!!