if thats the way it would have been put I would have agreed with it but he's argument was that he was young and nothing to do with the system he was in
Palmer won and played well in big games, say what you want about the talent around him but he raised his game against better competition and didnt build up his rep by beating Army and Navy. I thought Palmer was less of a given then most people thought and he has proved me wrong, he is one of the best QBs in the game and throws one of the best balls in the NFL which I dont think people put enough empasis on especially for QBs that will play in cold weather cities
I'll take a strong armed QB that won in college over one with all the stats but couldnt win big games anyday