colin

im surprised we couldn't add the face mask penalty onto the 4th down! isnt' that just an extra penalty?

i was looking for the flag the way this has been going too, but i should punch you in the face for saying it!!

sweet. CORNERS > PETERS!! EAT THAT BILL IN NYC!!

we play way too slow on O. our good plays have been quick hitters.

that was good. we do the hard stuff well, and the easy stuff badly.

teams have no fear of us, and they shouldn't

crap!

nice!

we suck so far. how the hell are we running these obvious bunched up running plays from predictable formations and these slow to develop pass plays? no play action, no quick outs, no rollouts, nothing.

we can't block or tackle

strouds out

its like they know our play before we run it.

so horrible our run and pass blocking is garbage, and peters is a big part of that.

mcgee sprained his knee

peters is the 3rd best tackle on the team right now. i think his great season last year had a lot to do with having a stud LG beside him. we have over rated him as fans, and paying him top dollar would be a sin. he deserves his current contract.

i think edwards could look better, but those last 2 3rd down passes to hardy were balls he could step back and get. he's not playing well.

peters is garbage.

cripes that was terrible

peters is such a fat whore!!

is it the same thing as that tho? making t shirts is very clearly using the trademark, but reporting on it is protected (there is precedent). even if the journalistic merits of a particular publication are slight to say it nicely (tabloids, etc.) they have been found to be protected as free press before. i'm not sure how it would work out, but if it has been battled out in court i'd be interested to see how it went. i'm pretty sure almost all fights with the nfl end with the first letter sent to the fan site or the web server.

this is what i'm talking about. you are conflating my NOT being a cry baby over what some kids on the internet are saying to supporting bad behavior and having a juvenile view of the world. you have no friggen idea of what my view on anything except freedom of speech is. the attitude you are showing, of attacking people who aren't cry babies being offended by the same stuff you are, is celebrating victim hood. don't be such a kitty, suck it up and turn the other cheek.

i'd be all over that in a second! holt and evans, along w parrish, hardy and reed? lynch and jackson in the backfield behind our giant line? that would give us a real shot right there.

my point is moralization saying that things just shouldn't be said is weak and unamerican. trying to stop it from being posted is garbage weak sauce-- just don't frequent sites that you don't like. about the logo thing -- sure they can file legal action, that's not exactly hard to do in this country. the question is will they win? if i have a fan site making constant fun of the pats (for example) and they file legal action against me, will they win in court? i can claim fair usage and that i'm not using their IP, and that i have freedom of speech and am writing satire (celebs can't sue AND WIN against tabloids if the tabloids aren't publishing outright lies).

do they? can i not use an image on a website that i own? i know the nfl has exerted pressure on web server providers and such, but do they have any legal authority to stop a site using team logos?

jesus lv, do you get off on whinging? they get A CHANCE. season ticket holders get first dibbs, these guys get second. they bought multiple game tickets, and you have a problem with them buying game tickets for the play offs? it doesn't matter if you live in buffalo AT ALL. if you live in toronto and buy season tickets, you get a shot at the playoffs. do you really care that much how far the fan in the seat has to travel to support them team?