Omar Little

Notice the two coaches you cited worked for a pair of the '90s most incompetent organizations. The Bills are one of the league's most incompetent franchises now, so I guess it wouldn't be too surprising if Gailey got a another year. It also won't be surprising when he fails as miserably as Shula and McGinnes did when they were inexplicably awarded extra opportunities. If some fans want Gailey to stay for continuity's sake, they'll get their continuity in the form of more failure.

Let's post Danny Wuerffel's college stats while we're at it. Tebow = nice guy, bad QB.

Here's a rare instance where I defend Chan Gailey: 31 other NFL head coaches don't want Naaman Roosevelt either.

So Gilmore will be the best CB in the league and Glenn will become a legendary, Canton-bound tackle? I like both of those guys so far, but you're going overboard with those projections.

Spiller is the only "wow" selection so far, but Nix's handpicked genius of a coach hasn't used him properly; ergo, to some extent, his talents have gone to waste.

Add CB and SS to the "huge need" pile, but I certainly agree with your point that Nix has done an absolutely awful job. It's funny to see Bills fans talk about how he and Gailey deserve another year. These are the same people who couldn't get rid of Jauron fast enough during his tenure. As bad as Jauron was - and he was certainly putrid - Nix and Gailey are a whole new level of horrible. The results speak for themselves, as do the amount of holes on the roster and inability to beat anyone but the dregs of the NFL. This is Year 3 of the amazing "rebuild," and this is not a good team right now; moreover, it doesn't appear on the path to being one anytime soon. Progress is nonexistent. But by all means, give these guys more time! Ridiculous.

Call me what you want. I'm right. Sorry I'm not cheerleading for a garbage franchise. Deal with it.

Can't believe I got sucked into a debate with an obvious troll. Well played - you got me.

Plenty of first-year head coaches have overseen progression in the teams they took over. Go back in the annals and find a 15-31 coach having a good fourth year. Again, it doesn't happen. You know why? Because no team is stupid enough to give someone who's that woefully ineffective a fourth year. I know Buddy Nix is an imbecile, but I just hope he's not dumb enough to think like you when it's time to make a coaching decision at season's end.

Nope. Not if an upgrade is brought in, and finding an upgrade over Chan Gailey wouldn't exactly be difficult. Then again, you probably think the 49ers made a mistake in eschewing continuity when they fired moronic Mike Singletary and hired Jim Harbaugh. If a coach has proven himself as ineffective, you make a change and hope you make the right choice with your next hire. That's that. But keep on apologizing for 15-31 Gailey, whose teams are still consistently getting run off the field three years into his tenure. Go back in the annals of NFL history and find a coach with a worse record who was retained after three years. It just doesn't happen.

If you can't see the idiocy in front of you on a weekly basis, that's your problem. Continuity is useless when it's obvious that the people in charge aren't good enough. Three years and no tangible progress. Make it four if the ever-important continuity wins out, because you'll be watching another awful, direction-less team. If you get your wish, a harsh lesson will be taught. Enjoy it.

Fans like you deserve the miserable results the Bills provide because you condone their actions and accept their stupidity.

Weird time to write that article. I could see doing it in early November when Nix gave Gailey a resounding vote of confidence, but things have gotten even worse since then and the coach has been a huge factor in that. Gailey is finished. You didn't just sort of compare Gailey to Belichick, did you? Hahaha.

It's either "Finale" by Tom Hedden or the longer version, "75 Seasons Suite," also by Hedden.

The idea that Washington might trade RG3 because of Cousins could be the funniest thing I've ever read on this board.

So? I wasn't just talking about rushing attempts. I was referring to putting the ball in their lone superstar's hands any way possible. Spiller has only gotten 20-plus touches once out of 13 games this year, which is completely unacceptable. He has one of the highest yards-per-carry totals ever, yet he's averaging just 11 carries a game. Fred Jackson is averaging the same amount of carries per game despite being a shell of his old self; he's not even in Spiller's stratosphere at this point. Then again, few are. Gailey is too dumb to realize it.

It's no accident that the Bills are 5-22 when Fitzpatrick throws 30-plus times. The less the ball is in his hands and the more it's in Spiller's, the better. Spiller has racked up at least 15 yards on 44% of his touches this year. Giving him the ball 20-25 times per game should be a no-brainer. Alas, the Bills have a moron for a head coach.

Amen. This guy gets it.

He most certainly hasn't. Bills fans need to stop accepting garbage.

The first time? What have you been watching for three years?

He's such an idiot. I can't wait until a year from now when the Bills are searching for their next GM. Whoever it is will probably be bad, but not this bad. So there's that.

Don't look now, but Fitzpatrick still sucks.

Hey, he signed up for an NFL job knowing that ugliness spews from fans. If it's too tough for him, he can retire now and leave the money on the table. Will he? No. Because he can handle it. He's not an 8-year-old.

Do I get a $60 million contract to walk that mile? If so, gladly.

Hahaha. He makes millions to play a kids' game and you're angry at people for criticizing his pathetic play and detesting the fact that they're forced to watch him QB their team? Get real.