LaDairis

George Herbert Walker Bush was a great President who did his best to control spending with a totally Dem controlled Congress and united the world to defend documented UN borders (well, other than the borders Israel violates...) in Desert Storm. As a result, he was trashed with the most vicious media coverage of any major party Prez candidate in modern history in 1992 for not selling out our troops to the Israel lobby. Zionists Larry King and others did an "October Surprise" five days before the election with an intentionally fake Iran-Contra piece as GHWB was closing on Clinton. George W Bush was the worst President in US history, a completely sold out idiot and traitor who spent like nobody since LBJ, socializing senior drugs by lying to Congress about the cost, with predictable economic results. W took a superpower with a surplus and sold out anything and everything he could to the Zionist lobby to get the money and especially the media coverage his pappy did not = our troops, the DOJ, the CIA, the Fed, the Treasury. W made those who hit us "not a priority" and sent way too few after them in Afghan, and then flipped off our allies in Afghan with our troops still deployed there, just as Israel wanted. W then intentionally lied and dumped our heroes in uniform in Iraq, just as Israel wanted. When the US economy collapsed because of W's porkfest, W bailed out the Chosen on Wall Street, just as Israel wanted. Jews in the US were above the law under W, including Madoff and those rabbis in NJ selling Palestinian body parts, just as Israel wanted. Under W, we were not the "United States," rather, we were the "States sold out to the Zionist Lobby." Thank you, President Obama, for deciding not to sell out the DOJ to the Zionist Lobby and instead prosecuting Zionist crooks like Madoff and those war criminal rabbi butchers.

Just the most recent one in 2009. In 2005, Iranians accepted the election results as fair. And it wasn't the Council as much as it was all of Ahmad's cronies he installed who lied to the Council.

You specifically ripped me for claiming GW is a fraud. You said it was not a fraud. Well, you were wrong. Different day, same result...

Indeed, in 2004, you voted for the biggest spending Prez of our time to be re-elected, one who had intentionally not gone after those who hit us on 911 by sending way too small a force to "not a priority" Afghanistan, flipped off our allies in Afghanistan, broke our laws and treaties to board a Gitmo (who wasn't even an AQ) to lie and say "Saddam is training AQ in chem," which Cheney then took to Meet The Press and said "we know Saddam is training AQ in chem." There were two reasons why W didn't want to get "not a priority" OBL. 1. Israel likes AQ, because they fight against Iran 2. W wanted to remind us "I'm a War President" because pappy Bush 41 had done the US national interest in 1991 by uniting 120 countries to kick Saddam out of Kuwait and leave him as a toothless UN problem, which is precisely what Saddam was in 2003, a toothless UN problem who had nothing to do with 911 and had precisely NO US NATIONAL INTEREST. But little W didn't want to lose in 2004 like his pappy did in 92, when Zionist "neocons" in the media blasted Bush 41 for "not finishing (Israel's, not our) the job" in Iraq. Indeed, the same Zionists who supported Bill Clinton with fury in 92 (Dick Morris, George Tenet etc.) were all for W in 2004. We invaded Iraq in 2003 over intentional lies and precisely nothing in our national interest so that Treasonous Sub Human Invalid Bible Thumping Socialist George W Bush would get tons of cash and favorable media coverage from the pro gay, pro abortion, pro socialism Israel lobby that supported Clinton in 92, nothing more. Every lie used to dump our heroes in uniform in Iraq was intentional, and most of the 120 allies we had in 1991 saw right through those lies, because it was obvious to anyone with a third grade understanding of the Middle East that smoking drinking Saddam and Islamic Lifestyle Osama could not possibly be pals. Everyone still defending W is either a Zionist Traitor or a sold out sub human invalid too dumb to have a clue, too lazy to get a clue, and too much of a hateful treasonous lowlife to care.

Actually, it was a 4 (out of 28, or way less than random guessing for 28). Intelligence matters for QB, OL, and the guys calling the signals on D. A corner can be dumb as mud, but if he can understand "go cover Reggie Wayne," and he is good enough to do that, you don't care about dumb, you just care about whether dumb means getting in trouble, and Tracy is just dumb, not a trouble-maker (like Hardy, who is dumb and in trouble a lot).

The CMU OL wasn't very good this year at all. In the bowl game vs. Troy, CMU lost the "pro prospect" battle by a wide margin, especially the Troy DL vs. CMU OL issue, where Troy has two pro prospects at DE and a junior DT, Eugene Kinlaw, who will be no lower than a Third Rounder next year. They got heat on Dan all game. The only reason CMU beat Troy was Dan. Dan's receivers were all body catchers, so Dan had to put the ball in the breadbasket for a completion. Dan doesn't have a really strong arm and will float anything more than 25-30 yards in the air, but he is by far the most developed, best reader of defenses in this Draft. He has a very neat quick compact overhead motion, gets rid of the ball quickly, and is lethally accurate with short passes. With this OL, Dan is about the best rookie option, but Dan will negate some of Evans' talents deep. The Brady comp is not correct. Dan's game is closer to Brees than Brady. And when Brady faced a ferocious Giant pass rush, he wasn't very HOFish either... Do yourself a favor and fix the OL first before you waste another high pick on yet another kid QB who will just be mauled behind your pathetic OL.

Our "US media" calls him a "conservative," but Daniel Pipes is yet another Zionist Traitor (the true definition of "Neocon"). He was pulling for Ahmadinejad to win... http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&cli...mp;aqi=&oq= In other words, he would rather have radicals in power in Iran, because that makes it more likely some traitor like W or John Sellout McCaipac would use the US military to wipe out Israel's main enemy Iran, Pipes' real goal as an "American Conservative."

Must have been "lucky" then... LOL!! Thanks for the fact documentation.

Porter had a man assignment on Reggie Wayne for most of the game. You would only notice that if the announcers pointed it out to you, but it was there on the screen in front of you. Porter was the MVP. Without Porter, the Saints have to double Wayne, and the Colts put up 40...

The Shah was a Shia version of Saddam. We were wrong to support him and the terrible Saddam-esque things he did. After the "revolution" and the Iran-Iraq war of the 1980s, Iran moderated and really had done nothing for more than a decade come 911. The election of Rafsanjani signaled that the radicals were marginalized... until W's treason, which "verified" what the radicals like Ahmad were saying, that the US is owned by Israel, that the US lies and wants to destroy Iran regardless (even if Iran helps the US off those behind 911). As lousy a Prez as Jimmy was, the fall of the Shah was not something he could have prevented. That was brewing for decades. And as lousy a Prez as Jimmy was, he was not a traitor like W, and W actually outspent Carter too.

Nice to know someone is honest here...

DC Tom is trying to weasel-wordsmith his way out of the truth that he both believed The FRAUD and pushed it here. The FRAUD was always a FRAUD, an OBVIOUS ONE at that. Nobody worth a salt in science was ever fooled by it.

On 911, there was an ongoing war in Afghanistan between The Taliban (including Al Qaeda) and The Northern Alliance, a collection of Taliban opponents armed and funded by Iran, then under the leadership of Rafsanjani, an Iranian "moderate" in his third term. Hence, the "enemy of our enemy" on 911 was Iran. There is a great piece here http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?articleId=11539 on what happened within W's Administration on the issue of Iran. Some select quotes... "Almost from the beginning of Bush's presidency, two groups in the administration were waging an intense struggle over Iran, while the U.S. government went month after month without an official policy. Those officials who wanted to try diplomacy had a champion in Undersecretary of State Richard Armitage, a close confidante of Secretary of State Colin Powell." "Within weeks (after 911), Iran, Syria, Libya, and Sudan all approached the United States through various channels to offer their help in the fight against al-Qaeda. "The Iranians said we don't like al-Qaeda any better than you, and we have assets in Afghanistan that could be useful," Leverett recalls." ... because... "The Iranians, who had been working for years with the main anti-Taliban coalition, the Northern Alliance" "It was the beginning of a period of extraordinary strategic cooperation between Iran and the United States. As America began preparing for the military operation in Afghanistan, Deputy Assistant Secretary of State for Near Eastern Affairs Ryan Crocker held a series of secret meetings with Iranian officials in Geneva. In those meetings, Iran offered search-and-rescue help, humanitarian assistance, and even advice on which targets to bomb in Afghanistan, according to one former administration official." So, the reality was, immediately post 911, that Iran, under then moderate Rafsanjani, was actually totally cooperating with us to nail Taliban/AQ in Afghan. We had a working relation with Iran under a moderate and rational leader to get Taliban. THEN WHAT HAPPENED??? "The inclusion of Iran in the "axis of evil" was at first opposed by then-National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice and her deputy, Stephen J. Hadley, because, as Hadley told journalist Bob Woodward, Iran, unlike Iraq or North Korea, had a "complicated political structure with a democratically elected president." But Bush had already made up his mind; regime change was the goal." Ummm, at the time of the "Axis of Evil," W has deployed our forces to Afghan to fight with Northern Alliance against Taliban/AQ. The Axis comment was an intentional flip off of Northern Alliance. In other words, if a Prez deploys US troops to theatre X to fight with ally A against enemy B, it would be 100% pure treason to intentionally flip off ally A while our troops are still deployed next to ally A, but that is precisely what W did with "axis of evil." Needless to say, our "working relationship" with the Rafsanjani government quickly evaporated with W's treasonous flip off. Why did W do that, flip off our allies in Afghanistan? "But it was Douglas Feith, the abrasive and aggressively pro-Israel undersecretary of defense for policy, who was responsible for developing the details of the policy. Feith had two staff members, Larry Franklin and Harold Rhode, who spoke Farsi, and a third, William Luti, whom one former U.S. official recalls being "downright irrational" on anything having to do with Iran" In other words, there was one and precisely one and only one reason for W to flip off Iran at the time - to SUKK UP to ISRAEL. So, instead of being allies against those who actually hit us on 911, Iran quickly realizes that W is 100% owned by Zionist money and media coverage, doesn't want those (not a priority) AQs behind 911 dead, but rather wants to pursue a war on all of Israel's enemies who had nothing to do with 911, and responds accordingly... "Reflecting the mood in Tehran, in May 2002, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei denounced the idea of negotiations with the United States as useless" Indeed, Iran had helped us in Afghan, and the next thing the Iranians discover is that they are "evil" according to w. "In a masterstroke, Rumsfeld and Cheney had shut down the only diplomatic avenue available for communicating with Iran and convinced Bush that Iran was on the same side as al-Qaeda." ... despite being actually at war with Al Qaeda on 911... Then we got ever more lies to get the US to use the US military to wipe out all of Israel's enemies who had nothing to do with 911 while those who did were publicly "not a priority" according to W, because the "priority" was always to SUKK UP TO ISRAEL for W, get that cash and favorable media coverage that sunk his pappy's 92 campaign with the Zionist BS that the US had not "finished the job" in Desert Storm. Lie after lie after intentional lie is used to justify invading Iraq, which has a 60% Shia population that views Shia Iran as an ally. A few months after the noWMD Iraqi military gets crushed, Iraqi Sunnis start blowing up Iraqi Shia mosques, something that gets endless media coverage in Iran. The Iraqi Shias tell the Iranian media (correctly) that the US won't arm them (the Shias) to stop these Sunni attacks. Hence, the Iranian media tells the Iranian people that the US wants this to happen, Shia mosques being blown up, because the US is "in charge" and won't do anything to stop it. Alas, being called "evil" and watching their like minded mosques blowing up across a border, the Iranian people in 2005 elect Ahmadinejad over Rafsanjani in a "runoff" (a very close election). There is precisely no way that Ahmadinejad wins in 2005 if W just does the US national interest and stays focused on wiping out Taliban/AQ with Iran's help. There is precisely no way that Ahmadinejad wins in 2005 if W stays out of Iraq. Ahmadinejad is 100% the creation of W's treason, and we should never forget that, especially over the next few weeks...

While a living breathing validation of the hypothesis of a inverse correlation between football and intelligence, healthy Tracy Porter is the third best CB in the NFL behind Revis and Jon Joseph. Bad pick in Round 2, right?? LOL!!! In two games, Tracy Porter essentially ended the game by picking off Favre and Manning, P. Nevermind those were the NFC Champ and the SB... Rings Tracy Porter 1 incredibly stupid Bills fans 0

Notice that nobody has attempted a serious defense of W, nobody claims Northern Alliance was not funded and armed by Iran (which it was), nobody is claiming that Iran under Rafsanjani wasn't helping us in Afghan before W flipped them off (because they were), nobody is claiming W didn't pork out and spend like a drunk sailor, complete with lying to socialize senior drugs, because he did. Nobody is claiming W didn't send way too few to Afghan for "not a priority" Osama Bin Laden, because the initial W deployment to Afghan was 12k or barely enough to take and hold Kabul and Khandahar. When Cheney went on Meet the Press and told us "we know Iraq is training Al Qaeda in chem weapons," nobody in our "US media" bothered to point out the following: 1. Osama lives "the Islamic Lifestyle," and the AQ manual states that "Islamic" leaders who don't live the lifestyle should be "overthrown." Saddam drank and smoked. If Saddam smoked in front of Osama, Osama would hack off his fingers. Osama and Saddam wanted each other DEAD. If Al Qaeda had existed in Iraq, they would have done the world a favor by offing Saddam and his kids, and Saddam knew that. 2. Chem is not a good weapon for Al Qaeda, which is why they don't use it. In fact, chem isn't a good weapon at all, which is why Saddam stopped his program before the Gulf War. Chem requires those expensive suits, expensive storage facilities (and air superiority, less those facilities get hit), is big and bulky, and only useful when your enemy is pinned in a valley (which is exactly the two situations Saddam used it) because the gas "sinks." Cheney and Zionist Traitor George Tenet broke our laws and treaties to "waterboard" one Gitmo, not even an AQ, to say "Saddam is training AQ in chem." THAT was Cheney's "evidence." TREASON...

Perhaps I would have been "somebody" two years ago had W not purged 7 Federal prosecutors for failing to follow W's doctrine that Madoff, the Rabbis in NJ selling Palestinian body parts, and the rest of the Zionists in the US were above the law. Hint: Madoff's indictment was Dec 12, 2008, or about three weeks into the DOJ transition. The only thing that kept Madoff from being indicted 2001-2008 was W and his non-stop appeasement of Zionists who hated his daddy.

No, much earlier. Try 15th century Romania... where the same thing was happening there: the "nobles" were selling out the people to fight and die for a foreign entity in exchange for money and political power, and then someone named Vlad tried to stop it. W and the THUMPERS are no different than the "nobles" of Romania in the 15th century, and they deserve the same fate Vlad gave the nobles...

What do you think should happen to documented traitors and those actively cheering treason against the US and the individual who harmed the US more than anyone in history??? A: a CHOSEN BAILOUT from Dual Citizen lifelong Dem Fed Chair CHOOSE'EM Ben Bernanke

The documentation of treason against the US is only funny to those who hate the US, like those pushing The FRAUD of Global non-Warming. If you cannot refute it, first try to get the poster banned, and then just shout him down... Every word of that is 100% true. Rafsanjani won three straight elections, and only lost in 2005 in a run-off because of "Axis of Evil" and endless Iranian media coverage of Iraqi Sunnis blowing up Shia mosques, all 100% the doing of W. Once W was gone, the Iranian people voted out Ahmadinejad, but it was too late, as he and his nutjobs have taken over.

This from a self-proclaimed "science expert" who assured us that Al Gore is 100% right about "Global" "warming."

And there you have it. No rights for Americans at all. No free speech. No telling the truth. Just send our troops to fight and die for a Greater Israel and then shovel our money into Zionist pocked on Wall Street after porking out for a decade. This above traitor supported 1. W's massive porkfest, completely with lying to Congress about the cost of Socializing senior drugs 2. intentional lies to dump our troops in Iraq for nothing in US national interest 3. making those who hit us on 911 "not a priority" Yes, indeed, traitor, you deserve to be burned alive in public.

"Unfortunately, he is strict to his Christian beliefs, and America seems to hate Christians these days." No, Americans just hate pseudo "Christian" traitors like W who dedicate their public lives to selling out our troops to raise cash and get favorable media coverage from the Zionist lobby. The US, under mostly GOP rule (in the House especially), prospered under the fiscal conservatism of Newt Gingrich, with a booming economy and a SURPLUS in the 1990s thanks to SIX STRAIGHT YEARS of NO FEDERAL SPENDING INCREASES. Then the pseudo THUMPERS couped Newt and the pork fest was on, led by Tom Delay, Frist, Fat Hastert, and the rest of the pseudo Christian traitors. Ten years later, the difference between what the US Federal government spent in 1998 and what it spent in 2008 was more than the 1.4 trillion deficit W's big spending Bible Thumping Socialist porkfest left us. Then there is the problem of the bigoted invalid traitors who call themselves "conservative Christians" supporting selling out our troops over intentional lies and precisely nothing in our national interest in Iraq while making those who hit us on 911 "not a priority," all to appease the pro gay, pro abortion, pro socialism Zionist lobby, which was cheering on 911 for Al Qaeda and Taliban in their ongoing war at the time with Iranian backed and funded Northern Alliance in Afghan, because Israel hates Iran. Iran, the enemy of our enemy on 911, was offering to help us off AQ under then Prez Rafsanjani, an Ahmadinejad opponent. When W flipped off Iran with "Axis of Evil," he flipped off our allies in Afghan, and he put Ahmadinejad in power in Iran. A Prez deploys troops to area A to fight with ally B against enemy C, and then the Prez, with our troops still there, intentionally flips off ally B = THAT is what W did in Afghan to appease the Zionist Lobby = TREASON. But W wasn't through selling out the US to Israel. Israel wanted the US to invade and occupy Iraq, which is why the same Zionist lobby hated Bush 41 so much, and W wanted money and favorable media coverage. Lie after lie after intentional lie was used to justify Iraq. Then W sold out The FED The TREASURY The DOJ The CIA also to the Zionist Lobby by installing 100% career pro gay pro abortion Dem Zionists to each. Finally, when the US economy collapsed because of the Bible Thumping Socialist PORKFEST 98-08, W took our money and handed it once again to Zionists on Wall Street. I have no problem with authentic Christians. I have a big problem with traitors, liars, big spending "Republican" sellouts, and those who think the US exists to serve Israel (as long as they get money and favorable media coverage to sell the US out to Israel). In fact, I would support a concentration camp for the total extermination of anyone and everyone still defending W while claiming something other than total hatred of the US. Anyone and everyone still supporting W hates the US completely, because nobody in our history ever did more harm to the US than W, and that is what such traitors celebrate when they defend W.

Thank you, Mr. Belichick...

Trent is a good ORT prospect. He won't fall past Round 2. He is one of the few true ORT prospects in the Draft, given that he spent most of his college career there. In truth, Duke and Loadholt were the two "weaknesses" on the Onor Ul OL last year. Texas beat OU because Loadholt couldn't block Orakpo at all. Beluga is a whale... http://images.google.com/images?client=fir...ved=0CBAQsAQwAA Brian Bulaga is an OLT prospect from Iowa. Jason Smith was the best athlete of the group last year. Yes, he struggled with NFL schemes, but his upside is considerable. Expect him to be better this year if his concussion issue is fixed. He absolutely mauled Orakpo, shut him down completely. Charles Brown and Rodger Saffold - hope they are available when the Bills have picks ready to spend on them.

Good thing the test did not ask how you spell CINCINNATI