Sundancer
-
Posts
1,560 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Profiles
Forums
Events
Posts posted by Sundancer
-
-
12 hours ago, Chef Jim said:
Holding his tongue? What does this mean? Why is he “holding his tongue”?
To not rile China more than he has on Taiwan. I may disagree with it but that's why. China is a danger.
12 hours ago, Chef Jim said:Trump? Why bring up Trump? What does he have to do with this? 🙄
We brought up Biden and DeSantis and their reactions to China's totalitarianism. Trump was president so his reaction matters too. The point is: US presidents need to be more circumspect than state governors.
-
4 hours ago, Big Blitz said:
The leader of the free world
He's a governor. Easy to pipe up when you don't wear the crown.
The current leader of the free world is holding his tongue and was roundly criticized by the right when he speaks out in support of Taiwan.
The last guy said it was great that Xi made himself totalitarian president for life.
-
45 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:
Yet another regurgitation of a falsehood, one of several as you changed your story from post to post.
Captain Apologist caught in another lie:
This was you, "The police spokesman in the link provided said that both men were holding hammers, and that they arrived, one man began bashing the other guy with a hammer" and here is the link.
As I've linked in the actual story, that's never what they said. It's a story you made up and I called you on it then and continue to. When might you admit you were 100% wrong?
Never.
Good look.
45 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:As for party crashing, the first time you darkened my doorstep with your silliness, you responded to a post I sent to @B-Man .
This time, you chimed in on a post directed to
While neither interaction would constitute a party in my mind, the consistent element was you reaching out to me in some strange quest to be validated.
Yeah, you chimed in to accuse me of changing some story. I've asked for a link to said change but you can't provide it. Yet here I am quoting your stupidity and noting your lie with actual evidence.
Your words haunt you two hammer conspiracy believer. If you want to pipe up, expect to get smacked around for being a liar.
BTW, cute that you're calling for Jim and B-Man for help. Can't fight your own battles?
-
13 hours ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:
Sunny D can’t keep track of his own posts, expecting him to follow yours is a big ask.
Two hammers believer guy shows up to a party to comment on credibility. That’s cute.12 hours ago, Chef Jim said:Yeah...it's JUST like that.
So do you think that they WAY overestimated the number of Covid deaths vs those that just died with Covid?
Yes I do.
But not based on your stupid article.
12 hours ago, Chef Jim said:BTW treatments and severity have nothing to do with the today's ratio. It's the number that showed up at ER with Covid or something else and were found to have Covid. Treatment hadn't even started yet.
They do when talking about deaths from Covid, your alleged point.
12 hours ago, Chef Jim said:-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, Chef Jim said:
Try to follow along with my point ok. Of the patients in LA county hospitals for Covid ony 40% were admitted FOR Covid while 60% were admitted WITH Covid. I was wondering aloud if the reports during the peak of Covid deaths had a similar ratio. Had 40% died FROM Covid while 60% died WITH Covid. It had nothing to do with the surge in LA county. Get it??
That makes even less sense given differences in treatments, severity, and prevention at different times during the pandemic.
It's like comparing the deaths from malaria in America in 1810 and now.
-
2 hours ago, Chef Jim said:
Jesus dude. You insinuate my news was bad. So I just linked for you that it was in fact not bad.
It’s flu season. It happens every year. Now it’s Covid. Who cares.
You said:
"They've been talking about the "surge" in Covid hospitalizations in LA county. There is a very interesting footnote. Of those admitted only 40% were admitted because of Covid. The other 60% were admitted for something else but tested positive for Covid. So is it safe to say that the number of deaths FROM Covid vs those WITH Covid could have been a similar ratio? "
You were questioning that there was a surge happening. In fact, there is a surge in terms of severity based on the data from LA County's CMO and your article. Do you not see that or are you just refusing to analyze that data?
-
9 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:
https://abc7.com/amp/covid-la-county-los-angeles-coronavirus/12498119/Health officials have said previously that roughly 40% of virus patients were actually admitted to hospitals for COVID-related issues, while the rest were admitted for other reasons but tested positive at the hospital.
You keep repeating the same thing. It shows a spike from what the LA County CMO previously said. That's not great news.
1 minute ago, Tiberius said:Oh
Nearly 9 in 10 covid deaths are in people 65 or older
Some epidemiologists and demographers predict the trend of older, sicker and poorer people dying at disproportionate rates will continue, raising hard questions about the trade-offs Americans are making in pursuit of normalcy — and at whose expense.
By Ariana Eunjung Cha and Dan Keating
Is this breaking news? Old and multiple comorbidity people (obesity being the most common one we have in fat America) have been disproportionately affected from day one.
-
38 minutes ago, Chef Jim said:
It’s not 40% of all admissions. Just those admitted with Covid. Only 40% of those went to the ER because of Covid. The other 60% were admitted for other reasons and later tested positive.Like I said, "40% FOR Covid is much higher than it has been running and would be quite a spike in Covid severity."
The LA County CMO indicated that fewer than 10% of Covid positive patients had any symptoms in September.
Either that's a big spike in severity you're reporting or the report you relied on is bad.
-
Spellberg is the CMO in LA County. (Post is from a few months ago admittedly.)
-
17 hours ago, Chef Jim said:
They've been talking about the "surge" in Covid hospitalizations in LA county. There is a very interesting footnote. Of those admitted only 40% were admitted because of Covid. The other 60% were admitted for something else but tested positive for Covid. So is it safe to say that the number of deaths FROM Covid vs those WITH Covid could have been a similar ratio?
40% for Covid is much higher than it has been running and would be quite a spike in Covid severity.
I doubt that number is true.
-
"[Xi's] now president for life, president for life. And he's great...he was able to do that. I think it's great. Maybe we'll have to give that a shot someday."
Leadership quote of the day. Given the eloquence, I suspect you can guess the speaker.
The protests are expanding into even Beijing. Good luck to them but don't expect much except Xi to slowly and quietly back off lockdowns.
-
12 minutes ago, Westside said:
Did the founders envisioned men dressed up as a woman prancing around on stage? Did they envision multiple genders you could choose to call yourself? Just curious.
Not related to the second amendment.
Thanks for trying to divert the conversation from the topic at hand. SQUIRREL!
-
Why it’s own thread? The answer is in the other thread. More guns, especially AR style, and less background checking solves everything.
The founders envisioned exactly this with the second amendment.
-
11 hours ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:
I’m sure there is a process to follow if you feel there is a violation in terms of service. I would point you in the right direction but I have never felt the need to do so in spite of disagreements, political differences or the occasional over-the-top insults or hostile posts that might come my way. There are many reasons why—lessons learned in life, basic understanding of human nature, and an absolute belief that the toxicity expressed by others isn’t my burden to carry.
I appreciate the opportunity to participate on the board and the format in which we all can participate. That you’ve chosen to share your opinion on how/why the site owner offers the PPP section reveals a degree of narcissism on your part. Do you really think I care what you think about what SDS thinks? If I had a question, I’d direct it to him.
All I can tell you is that I’ve read your posts, rejected virtually everything you’ve said as untruthful, manipulative, and that you’ve changed your story several times. You post things, and when confronted with what you’ve said, you pretend you didn’t. I most definitely respond with sarcasm, I most definitely mock you, and I acknowledge not knowing if you’re a middle school kid killing time, a run of the mill troll, or if you really have issues tracking what you’ve said and to whom you’ve said it.
You’ll have to ask @B-Man about his employment status. I’m not sure why that crossed your mind, but if I was keeping score it would be the second time you’re addressing what someone else thinks or does in one post. Also, while I’ve never met B personally, word on the street is he said one time “If you love what you do, you’ll never work a day in your life!”. Maybe that’s where your confusion is?
Now, back to the point. I see mods on the main board occasionally step in and suggest “the topic is no longer contributing to the community” and I think we’ve reached that point.
My suggestion is we simply agree that the best outcome for Mr. Pelosi and his family is a full and complete recovery. Not because he’s a kazillionaire, not because his wife is speaker of the house emeritus, but because he was a human being who had his skull fractured by a very disturbed individual wielding a hammer.
Good day, sir.
11 hours ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:I’m sure there is a process to follow if you feel there is a violation in terms of service.
Never said that. You’re making stuff up. Again.
11 hours ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:.
You post things, and when confronted with what you’ve said, you pretend you didn’t.
More made up stuff by you. Link?
11 hours ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:I
My suggestion is we simply agree that the best outcome for Mr. Pelosi and his family is a full and complete recovery. Not because he’s a kazillionaire, not because his wife is speaker of the house emeritus, but because he was a human being who had his skull fractured by a very disturbed individual wielding a hammer.
Not two hammers? You’re sure of that now?
-
1 hour ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:
Now, in addition to your naked man there is a conspiracy gang runnin’ the sane political board?What crap are you making up now?
Stick to your two hammer theories and apologizing for MAGA. You are better at jumping on others’ conspiracies than creating them yourself. @SDSruns TBD and allows this hole to exist because he somehow enjoys what it brings to the overall site. The gang doesn’t run it. They just hang out here and post non-stop. (Seriously, has B-Man ever worked a day in his life?)
-
23 hours ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:
Things are becoming a bit clearer to me as you continue to share thoughts about "nuts", their "naked man" talk, "conspiracies" and this being the "board" versus, I assume, some other place that isn't sane. I think now I can understand why someone like you would feel the need to take a stand against all these...conspiratorial factions...and places....and all these disturbing things said there.
I do want to tell you that The Matrix was a movie, and my name is not Neo. I also want you to know leh-nerd skin-erd is not my real name, and I don't use that to try and trick anyone or imply that I wrote or sang "Free Bird". Just to be crystal clear, in the event it comes up, I have sung along to Free Bird quite often, mostly in the car or at a party. I'm just not the person you hear when it plays on the radio.
Godspeed, son, on fighting this good fight against nuts, real or imagined, here on the sane board, or wherever it is the non-sane board lurks.
Your common moves:- make excuses for MAGA and the conspiracy gang here
- preach from your high horse
- leap to whataboutism when things are ugly for you
- avoid inconvenient facts like you’re doing in this exchange
-
1
-
1
-
-
2 hours ago, bobobonators said:
There is 0.0 percent chance the Thanksgiving schedule is adjusted. The Bills will play Cleveland in January before Turkey Day gets adjusted.
They would have to push out the entire playoffs a week to make that happen. Much better chance Thanksgiving changes.-
1
-
-
I predict Monday or Tuesday vs Cleveland and Sunday or Monday vs Detroit.
-
1
-
-
4 hours ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:
You didn't call out garbage, you created a narrative the didn't exist, took more positions than are detailed the Kama Sutra, and eventually when you ran out of rope you suggested I said something was "fishy" when I said it was "odd". Why did you do that?
What in god's holy hell are you talking about?
Get a grip on reality Neo. You've been in the Matrix too long.
I called out nuts who spun conspiracies out of whole cloth. Naked man. Two hammers. Gay lover.
4 hours ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:You are scoundrel, sir, and as we're about to see below, unwilling to back up that which you claim.
The world is full of small-minded, straight line, and fixed mindset people. I don't know if you're one of them generally, you might be a real hoot at neighborhood game night on a Friday in the suburbs. I do know you show all the signs of having such limitations here, on this part of the board.
I've addressed Donald Trump being charged, found guilty and convicted. I've addressed alternate outcomes based on facts known and unknown. I don't know what the outcome will be, because I know I don't have all the facts. That hardly makes me an apologist, but it most definitely shows the wisdom of recognizing there are several potential outcomes to this as yet unresolved political theater. To close one's mind and completely disregard potential outcomes is the sign of a dullard, and I think that describes you quite well.
Look before you leap, Sunny, and remember that fools rush in.
Seems like in the list of what if Trump did this and what if Trump did that you posted, you keep ignoring the fact that I keep bringing up.
How to be the Apologist King:
Dig hole
Insert head
Fill in hole
And this is the sane Bills politics board!
-
11 minutes ago, BillsFanSD said:
If the team just said "We don't want Tre's first two games to be played five days apart on one of the worst surfaces in the league so we're sitting him two more weeks" I'd be 100% cool with that.
Not cool with the silent treatment.
They don’t have to say anything to you about Tre’s knee or Josh’s elbow. -
26 minutes ago, mrags said:
Not sure what his deal is but I think it’s mental and not physical.
Stick with your statement before the “but” and you make sense.
You have no idea. None.
-
55 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:
This is gibberish, much like the nonsensical conspiracy post you spun on the Pelosi reporting.
Erm. I spun a conspiracy about Pelosi?
No. I called out all the garbage being posted here as conspiracy hype.
55 minutes ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:Trump created his own mess by taking/keeping data he should not have.
The DOJ is not his friend, the democrat majority is not an ally, and by allegedly taking material that he should not have. As a result, he should have assumed that at some point, armed agents in tactical gear would raid his home and seize property contained therein.
When the DOJ decided to raid his home, they sent a large squad of officers in tactical gear, they reportedly instructed people at the home to shut off security cameras. They allegedly took material covered by the subpoena, and a substantial amount of material they should not have seized. That data is reported to have included tax records and a trove of attorney-client material.
There have been multiple leaks attributed to people involved in the investigation about what may/may not have been there. Some of these reports are in conflict.
The DOJ took the time to photograph files and documents purported to contain material that was confidential+ and released it to the media.
The DOJ, upon seizing documents that they should not have seized (allegedly), claimed to the court that the need for an independent party to look at the material and protect the interests of all parties would jeopardize national security and besides, they could sort through the material and be trusted to do the right thing.
If Donald Trump was trading in top secret and confidential information, he should be charged, convicted and jailed in accordance with the laws of the land that are applicable.
If his actions were not nefarious, and a matter of what he may/may not have been able to declassify, and it turns out the DOJ was acting in a partisan political fashion, those that authorized the raid and seizure should be held accountable.
If, when applying current law and standards to the situation he violated a law that is a law, but one of those laws that isn’t really acted upon, like one that is law-ish or law-like but not really law-law, it should be handled as such.
Now, tell me where we disagree, tell me how I’m apologizing for the actions of DJT, and try to use words in sequence that make sense.
And what about the part where he represented more than once that he had turned over all the top secret information? Ya know, the actual act that prompted the raid? You left out a wee little piece of this, didn't you Apologist King?
-
On 11/5/2022 at 11:03 AM, BillsFanNC said:
More questions. I'm sure all will be answered in the select committees report even if the FBI can't get to the bottom of it.
And geofence warrants? I thought geofencing technology was something made up by a grifter documentarian?
All so confusing.
You and B-Man conspiracy-ing it up! Don't you have a whole 'nother board full of conspiracy obsessed Bills fans run by an election denier to play on?
-
1
-
-
17 hours ago, leh-nerd skin-erd said:
That's the narrative, but there have been no charges filed, no testimony given, no questioning of witnesses in a court room setting. It remains to be seen if the laws governing this sort of alleged behavior are those a reasonable prosecutor would pursue, and/or whether or not a reasonable prosecutor is making the determination.
What we do have is a cascade of anonymous DOJ sources, some apparently in conflict with others, as is par for the course when the the government squeezes an individual.
As I indicated---it was an unforced error on his part, it didn't need to happen, and there was no need to expose his throat to a wolf he surely knows is lurking nearby. Do you think we're in disagreement here?
That changes nothing with respect to Hillary Clinton, which was part of the post I replied to.
You are the Apologist King.
13 hours ago, Doc said:What Hilly did was far worse. She deleted e-mails after being told not to do so and it doesn't strain credulity to believe she did it for nefarious reasons. But we'll never know what those emails contained because they're gone. Trump OTOH took material he allegedly shouldn't have taken and the government reclaimed it. If the reason to indict him is just that and there's no intent, much less use of the material for personal gain, it's a pretty lame charge. But by all means, indict him and get him out of DeSantis' way.
Well, he also lied and said he returned everything, when he didn't. And he said they were declassified, when they weren't. So although you're eager to find Hillary's intent, perhaps don't be so quick to ignore Trump's.
BTW, I think in both cases, their intent was to cover up their f$%#-ups, not to sell things to foreign powers.
17 hours ago, Demongyz said:Did Hillary just delete all the emails or did she return them?
Hi there. That's whataboutism.
Protests Breaking Out Across China
in Politics, Polls, and Pundits
Posted
I'm not totally convinced he's running though he may but they can say crazy ***** too. Inauguration day is when things get real.